F
Faith1960
Guest
I think I might go to confession tonight and ask my priest.Are you still thinking of prayer as a magical imperative? That it somehow prods God into action in some way? Against His will?
I think I might go to confession tonight and ask my priest.Are you still thinking of prayer as a magical imperative? That it somehow prods God into action in some way? Against His will?
This really isn’t the forum where I respond, but there is a faith based answer that has been hinted at.Anyone?
Yeah. I think they wanted to find a way to break the rules. To prove faith. And that would be trying to trick God into revealing His action. A way of fooling Him into falling in line with their expectations. Or not falling in. Or whatever.I surely don’t think doctors set out to “fool” God.
To be able to do what? Prescribe God like a medicine? Give Him out as a dosage? Take one of these pills and fifty-two Hail Mary’s?They wanted to observe these findings so that it could help others with healing in the future.
Yep. All the same thing in common too. Test God. See if He’ll come to class. But He won’t. Because that’s not what He’s after. He doesn’t need outside help in this. He doesn’t need white coats to prove His existence to Him.There have been many, many tests on this topic. They usually end with results similar to if people had not prayed. Some people get better, some don’t, some get worse; same as answered prayers…some get answered, some don’t–but the same findings are found if a person has a lucky charm or does positive thinking, etc, etc.
From what I understand, one of the tests that showed some did worse when prayed about…this happened when the person was* told* they were being prayed about, and doctors assumed it put them under “pressure” to do well.
If people were not told they were being prayed about, they rarely got worse.
.
Let’s see. You said no one was trying to fool God. But here you are trying to fool me into agreeing with you that you can judge God like that. That you can stand up to the unimaginable and unconfined unknown. And then just imagine He is confined to the known. That He has to dance to a certain tune. A tune you’re already set to play.That’s pretty unfair and unreasonable of God!
He doesn’t want anyone to test Him…and yet, he can test Abraham by asking him to kill his only child?
And soooo many other tests.
It don’t sound right.
.
Wow. You really tailed me on this. Took me each time. Followed me and pounced! I like that. I like the feeling of the wind in my hair. As I run just ahead of you. Tag me again. It’s fun.I think…by Jesus/God’s rules.
*
Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you*
–Matt 7:7
–Luke 11:9
–John 14:13
–Mark 11:24
(and more…)
.
Are you a Christian?I disagree.
Because if prayer showed to help people heal…it still wouldn’t prove faith. There could be a number of things happening.
Oy vay…don’t you want to *encourage *people to pray?
If someone is sick, do you pray for them or ask others to pray for them in hopes it will help? Do you suggest to people to pray to help themselves?
If a study showed that prayer helps people, it would encourage many more to start praying or to pray more.
That’s no different than someone saying, “I encourage you to pray”.
I’m sure this God would be happy if more people got into prayer, and he wouldn’t mind if their inspiration was a study they read about in the Life section of the NYPost.
LOL! I’m sure this all-mighty God is tough enough to handle a few little humans in white coats.
And I’m sure he can see the more positive motives and possible end results to a study like this than you are focusing on…and knows that for many people, it’s not about winning or testing or proving anything…*it’s about learning and helping others.
*
God’s way more positive than you give him credit for.
I have a feeling that if these tests showed that prayer had a significant effect, you’d be crooning a different tune.
.
Well I didn’t see that coming!I disagree.
Yeah. It might. But you and I know what the headlines would read. Just like His non-response could be a number of things happening. But you’re not thinking of any of those. You’re not on to any of those other things. You’re on one track with this. Just like the world would be if the proof was in. Written up in a peer-review.Because if prayer showed to help people heal…it still wouldn’t prove faith. There could be a number of things happening.
That’s a funny thing to say. Because you’re not really confused. And you already know the answer. :tsktsk: <–Sorry. I always wanted to use that guy. I’ve usually worried it’d be used on me first though.Oy vay…don’t you want to *encourage *people to pray?
I know why you’re saying this. I mean I do. But there’s a different point to think on here. Jesus said it was faith of a certain size that did stuff. Not prayer. Sure prayer can be an expression of faith. But prayer said with no heart is dead. So what you’re saying in all this is just the opposite of what would help. Because the test is on faith.If someone is sick, do you pray for them or ask others to pray for them in hopes it will help? Do you suggest to people to pray to help themselves?
If a study showed that prayer helps people, it would encourage many more to start praying or to pray more.
I don’t know about that. I mean why doesn’t God take out an ad Himself it that’s how He wanted it done?That’s no different than someone saying, “I encourage you to pray”.
I’m sure this God would be happy if more people got into prayer, and he wouldn’t mind if their inspiration was a study they read about in the Life section of the NYPost.
And He did. He handled them just fine.LOL! I’m sure this all-mighty God is tough enough to handle a few little humans in white coats.
Wow. You sure know a lot about God. You sure have a good idea of what He wants. So why don’t you do that then? Why don’t you do what He wants?And I’m sure he can see the more positive motives and possible end results to a study like this than you are focusing on…and knows that for many people, it’s not about winning or testing or proving anything…*it’s about learning and helping others.
*
God’s way more positive than you give him credit for.
I have a feeling that if these tests showed that prayer had a significant effect, you’d be crooning a different tune.
.
I’m not talking to everyone. Just you. (Would it be overdone to use the finger waving guy again?So…the doctors are trying to fool God and I’m trying to fool you…and now I’m judging God?
I don’t grok your logic at all.
Not everyone is trying to fool or test or judge others. Just an FYI.
.
Jesus didn’t send you as a messenger to me. He’s probably the one who trapped you in that steam room though. Are you sure you don’t want me to call someone about that? Maybe get you some air? Or something?No entrapment here; I’m just the messenger.
Them’s Jesus’ words.
.
Could we stop the sniping you two, and get back on topic? Anyone else like to add their two cents?I’m not talking to everyone. Just you. (Would it be overdone to use the finger waving guy again?)
Jesus didn’t send you as a messenger to me. He’s probably the one who trapped you in that steam room though. Are you sure you don’t want me to call someone about that? Maybe get you some air? Or something?
Peace DG.
-Trident
Is that the answer? I spoke to my priest last night for a short while, went to confession and brought this up, but there was a semi-long line for confession so I didn’t want to hold the line up. I emailed him and am still waiting back to hear from him.This really isn’t the forum where I respond, but there is a faith based answer that has been hinted at.
As it is written,
“Thou shall not put the lord your God to the test.”
It is very difficult to study God without falling into the trap of testing him. No one is so remote from God, so unconcerned with the outcome of such a study, double blind or not, as to be immune to the vice of “testing” God in such a circumstance.
Even an atheist, someone supposedly ill concerned entirely, would confound the results because they are de facto, testing. God remains real despite the outcomes and the people used to obtain them both.
I don’t know if it is THE answer. But it was mine. We’ll have to wait and hear from your priest when he responds. In the meantime, you might consider or not, “studying” God in your own prayers – I wouldn’t because for me it seems disrespectful to study or test God in any way. Better to study yourself, self study is a good way to learn what God wants for you. Hopefully a person would know to not set ultimatums with God – “If this happens, then I’ll do this or that, or then I’ll know this or that is true, etc.” We grow out of that habit as children.Is that the answer? I spoke to my priest last night for a short while, went to confession and brought this up, but there was a semi-long line for confession so I didn’t want to hold the line up. I emailed him and am still waiting back to hear from him.
Sorry Faith. I didn’t mean to get carried away. I was just in sort of a good mood and was having a bit of fun. I’ll back out of this. I hope you get your answer.Could we stop the sniping you two, and get back on topic? Anyone else like to add their two cents?
You don’t need to back out of the thread.Sorry Faith. I didn’t mean to get carried away. I was just in sort of a good mood and was having a bit of fun. I’ll back out of this. I hope you get your answer.
Peace.
-Trident
Anyone think that that’s the answer?I don’t know if it is THE answer. But it was mine. We’ll have to wait and hear from your priest when he responds. In the meantime, you might consider or not, “studying” God in your own prayers – I wouldn’t because for me it seems disrespectful to study or test God in any way. Better to study yourself, self study is a good way to learn what God wants for you. Hopefully a person would know to not set ultimatums with God – “If this happens, then I’ll do this or that, or then I’ll know this or that is true, etc.” We grow out of that habit as children.
Consider these words from Fr. Laurence Freeman, OSB:Anyone think that that’s the answer?
Yes, except the part from the CCC. Can you dumb it down for me, please?Consider these words from Fr. Laurence Freeman, OSB:
“Prayer is not informing God of our needs or asking God to change his mind. We are not setting up our will in opposition to God’s will or telling God what he should be doing. Such egocentric prayer fosters many forms of neurotic religious behavior, such as praying for victory over others or the fulfilling of our fantasies and egotistical desires.”
Now consider the words of the Catechism, #2734-2735:
“Filial trust is tested - it proves itself - in tribulation. The principal difficulty concerns the prayer of petition, for oneself or for others in intercession. Some even stop praying because they think their petition is not heard. Here two questions should be asked: Why do we think our petition has not been heard? How is our prayer heard, how is it efficacious? In the first place, we ought not be astonished by this fact: when we praise God or give him thanks for his benefits in general, we are not particularly concerned whether or not our prayer is acceptable to him. On the other hand, we demand to see the results of our petitions. What is the image of God that motivates our prayer: an instrument to be used? or the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ?” (emphasis mine)
Intercessory prayer is an important part of the Christian life. We depend on God for everything, and we turn to him in time of need. This is good, but there is also more to prayer than just getting what we want, however good and noble we think our desires might be. Using the “results” of intercessory prayer in a test as some sort of proof of God’s care or existence misses the whole point of prayer. Does any of this make sense to you?
It makes sense enough.Consider these words from Fr. Laurence Freeman, OSB:
“Prayer is not informing God of our needs or asking God to change his mind. We are not setting up our will in opposition to God’s will or telling God what he should be doing. Such egocentric prayer fosters many forms of neurotic religious behavior, such as praying for victory over others or the fulfilling of our fantasies and egotistical desires.”
Now consider the words of the Catechism, #2734-2735:
“Filial trust is tested - it proves itself - in tribulation. The principal difficulty concerns the prayer of petition, for oneself or for others in intercession. Some even stop praying because they think their petition is not heard. Here two questions should be asked: Why do we think our petition has not been heard? How is our prayer heard, how is it efficacious? In the first place, we ought not be astonished by this fact: when we praise God or give him thanks for his benefits in general, we are not particularly concerned whether or not our prayer is acceptable to him. On the other hand, we demand to see the results of our petitions. What is the image of God that motivates our prayer: an instrument to be used? or the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ?” (emphasis mine)
Intercessory prayer is an important part of the Christian life. We depend on God for everything, and we turn to him in time of need. This is good, but there is also more to prayer than just getting what we want, however good and noble we think our desires might be. Using the “results” of intercessory prayer in a test as some sort of proof of God’s care or existence misses the whole point of prayer. Does any of this make sense to you?
Ok, I get it now, but still…if God hears our prayers, shouldn’t the number of those who got well or done well be higher after all that praying going on? I mean, in addition to the intercessors in the study, Aprox. 96% of the patients were being prayed for by others.Yes, except the part from the CCC. Can you dumb it down for me, please?
Should they get better with all that praying? Not necessarily. God hears and answers our prayer in his own way, knowing what is best for us, in ways we cannot always see. As I said before, maybe all of those prayers actually prepared the heart patient for a holy death. Isn’t being received into Heaven ultimately more important than a few more years on earth?Ok, I get it now, but still…if God hears our prayers, shouldn’t the number of those who got well or done well be higher after all that praying going on? I mean, in addition to the intercessors in the study, Aprox. 96% of the patients were being prayed for by others.
Why didn’t more get better? It seems to me the outcome would’ve been the same whether they were prayed for or not. No?
Most of the patients prayed for didn’t die, they just didn’t get any better than those who weren’t prayed for.Should they get better with all that praying? Not necessarily. God hears and answers our prayer in his own way, knowing what is best for us, in ways we cannot always see. As I said before, maybe all of those prayers actually prepared the heart patient for a holy death. Isn’t being received into Heaven ultimately more important than a few more years on earth?
When we pray intercessory prayers, we should always make our request with the provision that it be in accord with God’s Will. God knows what is best for us, and that is what the Catechism meant by filial trust - complete trust, like a child. We have to trust that God will provide what we most truly need, even if it means not surviving a medical procedure. The fact that a heart patient lives or dies with or without prayer does not really prove anything about God. I would say the premise of that test was flawed from the start.
This should not discourage us from praying for ourselves and others, however. Our Lord and the Church instructs us to pray and to ask for what we need, even though God already knows, and no prayer is ever wasted.