Hmm, the thread has strayed a little from the original topic, great though the discussion is.
Seems LW was originally asking as much about men being called to the priesthood as men (and women) being called to the religious life. I can’t speak much to the religious life, so I leave that to our more knowledgeable Brother JR.
In terms of the priesthood, though, one short but compelling answer is that there are currently not anywhere near enough priests to provide the sacraments (Eucharist, confession, last rites) to those who are in need of them. I’ve seen this in my parents’ relatively remote parish where, far too frequently, there is no priest available to say Sunday Mass and parishioners must have a lay-led Sunday liturgy instead.
Indeed there is a thread on the fora at the moment about a poor housebound soul whose priest refuses to visit to hear his or her confession - ever - citing lack of time to do so as the reason, and for the same reason rarely visits the local hospital to provide last rites to those who need them.
That, certainly, is a deplorable side-effect of the drop in vocations, and one which must be remedied.
There is a definite shortage of priests and it’s going to get more serious. What is happening now is that religious orders are doing two things: 1) Some are refusing to ordain as many men as we did in the past, because we don’t need so many priests for our communities and 2) many religious orders of men are pulling out of parishes, because our founders did not intend for us to be in parishes. We’re closing parishes or leaving them open with no staff. It’s up to the bishop to decide what he want us to do. I’m referring to the parishes. He can’t tell religious men what to do with their lives. He certainly cannot order religious superiors to ordain more men or to stay in the parishes. He can’t suppress the religious in hid diocese. That’s a grave sin.
If you watch EWTN, I believe that only one of the priests who is on EWTN is a parish priest. None of the others are parish priests. They all belong to religiuos orders and their superiors will not assign them to parishes. Fr. Corapi has never been in a parish. Fr. Benedict G. has never been in a parish and neither have the Franciscans of the Renewal. The Franciscans of the Eternal Word have never been in a parish and have no plans to ever be in parish work. Plus they ordain very few men, only enough for their friars and for the nuns. Fr. Mitch has never been in a parish. Fr. Brian Mullady has never been there. Msgr. Streackland (sp?) has never been in onw. I believe that the only one who is a parish priest is the former Anglican, whose name I can’t recall.
All of the religious are part of the new “no parish” religious. I call them “no parish religious” because the younger generaion of religious wants to live religious life. Those who ask for ordination really enjoy going to a chapel or parish to say a Sunday mass or hear confessions and leave. They want to be back in their religious houses.
This means that we have to find secular men who want to remain secular men so that we can ordain them to the priesthood. The parish is properly the ministry of the secular priest.
The good news is that there are some dioceses that have no shortage of secular priests. But these are not large dioceses. They don’t cover large areas. I know that Arlington, VA has three to five priests in every parish. Arlington Diocese is very small, but very rich in vocations. Boston has two to three secular priests in every parish. But it’s not an extensive diocese. It has a large population, not a large geographical area. Because of Cardinal Sean, at least five branches of the Franciscan order have volunteered to take on parisshes in that diocese. But I’m not so sure that they’ll stay when he retires. They are really very attached to him. They went there because he is very much loved by the friars, the same for Denver. Archbishop Chaput is a friar and the friars are willing to do anything to suppor their brother. This is als true in Australia. Cardinal Pell has a strong following of Dominicans who are very attached to him, because it’s his order.
We can’t count on religious men taking over parishes or staying in them. There is also the problem of what to do with the Middle Class and higher. Many of us are not allowed to serve the Middle Class or higher. We did it for a long time as a favor to the bishops. These communities began as very poor communities that made a lot of progress, which is good. We want people to move ahead.
For exmaple, some communities have it in their rule that when the Catholics reach the Middle Class, the religious must move out and they must hand those people over to the secular clergy. When there is not secular clergy, then there is a problem. We have to promote vocations to the secular diaconate and secular priesthood.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF
