Why so many Protestant denominations

  • Thread starter Thread starter pete_29
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
DebChris;:
I have not seen a church identifying itself as Messianic Jew.
You probably have, and simply not recognized it as such. The key to telling which group a Jewish House of Worship is affiliated with, as by how it is named. (The rule sets are for Hebrew, are very precise, but extremely complicated.)

xan

jonathon
 
Why so many Protestant denominations.

Well why so many Catholic denominations.
  1. Conservative
  2. Liberal
  3. Eastern Rite
  4. Traditional (sspx)
  5. Charismatic Renewal
  6. Folkloric
Also I never understood why the Catholic religion has the following:

Jesuits - Franciscans - Dominicans - Carmelites - etc… Didn’t these all start because of these Priests wanting to have it their way ? Also the Franciscans started per St Francis who never became a Priest… God Bless…:confused:
 
Also I never understood why the Catholic religion has the following:

Jesuits - Franciscans - Dominicans - Carmelites - etc… Didn’t these all start because of these Priests wanting to have it their way ? Also the Franciscans started per St Francis who never became a Priest… God Bless…:confused:
There are several ways to serve God through The Church.

These groups began because a man or woman led an outstandingly good life and set a great example of Christianity. They contributed something to The Body of Christ that others felt they wanted to emulate. The name of the group doesn’t mean that those members in any way worship or deify the person, but the name symbolizes the theology of the person, the lifestyle. Most are 2nd Orders of a religious vocation (1st Order being a Priest, 3rd being a layperson, etc…).

Each group had a calling at their particular time.

I’ve worked a lot with Franciscans. They work with the poor and manage homes for unwed teenage mothers, etc… They are very holy men.

Matter of fact, I spent the Easter Vigil with Father Groeschel and Father Apostoli. I felt as if I was looking at walking Saints. When these men come into a room you could feel their holiness.

I kid you not, I felt that I was looking at an Apostle when I spoke to these men.

It just so happened that Father Groeschel didn’t have a candle for the beginning of The Service. I gave him mine. When they brought his, they gave his to me.

So this holy man that I’ve been waiting for years to meet, who literally was the biggest secular influence to my reversion back to my Christian faith was holding my light and I was holding his light during the ceremony.

It was the best Easter I had ever had.

Sorry…TMI, I know, 😊 but I just wanted to share that.

🙂
 
Also I never understood why the Catholic religion has the following:

Jesuits - Franciscans - Dominicans - Carmelites - etc… Didn’t these all start because of these Priests wanting to have it their way ? Also the Franciscans started per St Francis who never became a Priest… God Bless…:confused:
Catholics don’t have denominations (groups with differing beliefs), but rites (groups with same beliefs.
 
Also I never understood why the Catholic religion has the following:

Jesuits - Franciscans - Dominicans - Carmelites - etc… Didn’t these all start because of these Priests wanting to have it their way ? Also the Franciscans started per St Francis who never became a Priest… God Bless…:confused:
No, just the opposite - they were started because of priests and religious men and women wanting to grow in holiness, service, and obedience to Christ and His Church. They are diverse forms of spirituality and service within the one Church. All of them are in full communion with and in total obedience to the Pope, and to the Magisterium of the Catholic Church - there is nothing egotistical or rebellious about any of them.
 
That may be subjective. You may have had a bias. If you do not attend a service with the expectation of being fed spiritually, you probably won’t be fed.

Just to show the difference, when I attended my first Protestant service, the message was alive. My spirit was fed with fresh revelation. Even though some of you believe it was only an emotional experience, it has lasted for 6 years.

When I went back to the Catholic Mass, the Mass seemed like the same show, over and over. The message didn’t grow, only the homily changed. And my priest didn’t have many life experiences to share, learn or teach from.

So, just wanted to give a different perspective.
the Mass is not about how good the homily is. unfortunately that is the essence of the protestant service and the success of the church relies on this alone, as well as the music and if the person “fits in” with the people like a highschool clique. this is another reason why there are 33,000 and not one.

the Mass is about participating in the Sacrifice on Calvary. He offers Himself to us everyday, because we need Him everyday. leaving because of the homily, the music, or the people is like leaving a banquet because you didn’t like the door greeter. if those elements are bunk, the Sacrifice remains the same, now and forever. that is another reason why the Church is 2,000 years old and will remain for all time.

========

forgive my speculation but it seems like you may sense the need for one, universal church, but because you are comfortable where you are at, you ignore what God is telling us because you don’t want to leave your comfort zone. you may not want to jeopardize your family by taking a risk.

fortunately God is infinitely merciful and can reach around such things. if you want to be like the Apostles and disciples who actually followed Jesus around, that group is the Catholic Church. if you want to be in a far away group that isn’t getting all that Jesus teaches, but that Jesus allowed and said, “Let them”, then continue.
 
lies, damn lies, and statistics.

I have been watching people throw around ridiculous numbers on the number of protestant denominations for too long, Catholics use it because it has been used by respected Catholic Apologists, and because it is a discussion starter( kind of like breaking the ice with a hand grenade).:bigyikes:

The number is ridiculous number, and Protestants, for all your talk about thinking for yourselves, using your own reasoning and God given brains,-how could you let pass what you knew in your gut was just not right? . 😊

That number,** 33,000 Protestant denominations** comes from a single source…who either doesn’t understand the concept of Church, Denomination or communion; whose research/ record keeping is more anecdotal, eccentric collector / hobbyist than a scientist; . Whatever his story, he is really annoying the heck out of me.

Source:
David B. Barrett: World Christian Encyclopedia : a comparative survey of churches and religions in the modern world
He is the single source of the 33,000 number; you will not find another independent source which duplicates his numbers;
The reason they are so out of whack is because he either never knew, or decided to r
edefined the word “denomination”,to fit his style of research.

Unfortunately the mainstream media who are ignorant about all things Christian, and wouldn’t know Holy Oil from snake oil, keep using his numbers like they were gospel truth-this includes Encyclopedia Britannica, World Almanac, innumerable journalists, and not a few Catholic Apologists (who really should know better).

HERE’S THE SECRET TO THE 33,000 Protestant denominations.
He redefined the word denomination (I’m being kind, there’s another word for what he’s done, and if it was in field that depended on his research to make life and death decisions, the man would be in prison).

A denomination is defined in this Encyclopedia as an organized aggregate of worship centers or congregations of similar ecclesiastical tradition within a specific country; i.e. as an organized Christian church or tradition or religious group or community of believers, within a specific country, whose component congregations and members are called by the same denominational name in different areas, regarding themselves as one autonomous Christian church distinct from other denominations, churches and traditions. As defined here, world Christianity consists of 6 major ecclesiastico-cultural blocs, divided into 300 major ecclesiastical traditions, composed of over 33,000 distinct denominations in 238 countries, these denominations themselves being composed of over 3,400,000 worship centers, churches or congregations.”
(Barrett et al, volume 1, page 16, Table 1-5.)

So the 7 groups making up the Anglican “ecclesiastico-cultural mega-blocs”(btw, not to shabby for not bad in it’s 500 year history) are not 7 denominations;
Each individual country gets it’s own count; even if the Churches are part of a single body in communion, theologically and organizationally. If there is one in Australia and one in Bolivia, (kind of like there are Catholic Churches in many countries , each is counted separately.
So instead of 7 Anglican-type communions, there are 168.

AND THE ROMAN CATHOLICS GET THE SAME TREATMENT; if you bother to check, you would find out that you are not a the “One Holy Catholic Church” but , according to his way of accounting, the Roman Catholic Church consists of 236 denominations in the world’s 238 countries. And that number doesn’t even take into account the schismatic/dissenting groups mentioned in previous posts.

Are you beginning to see how this Math is going?
Here’s the long and short of it-

The 33,000 are subdivided into “6 major ecclesiastico-cultural mega-blocs”, and ordering them by denomination size we have the figures for the year 2000:
Code:
* Independents (about 22000)
* Protestants (about 9000)
* "Marginals" (about 1600)
* Orthodox (781)-most of which are in communion with each other
* Roman Catholics (242)
* Anglicans (168)
So the 33,000 number is from the total of these 6 mega-blocs:

22000 + 9000 + 1600 + 781 + 242 + 168 = 33,000+

From a Review by from Richard N. Ostling, Associated Press, 19 May 2001:

… Barrett has doggedly visited most of the lands in person, collecting raw material, including national census figures and United Nations data, and recruiting the 444 specialists who feed him material. Among them: Vatican missions librarian Willi Henkel and editor J. Gordon Melton of the Encyclopedia of American Religions. Barrett’s encyclopedia sought to count each human being in each religion and religious subcategory in each country as of 1900, 1970, 1990, 1995 and 2000, with projections to 2025.
 
lies, damn lies, and statistics.

I have been watching people throw around ridiculous numbers on the number of protestant denominations for too long, Catholics use it because it has been used by respected Catholic Apologists, and because it is a discussion starter( kind of like breaking the ice with a hand grenade).:bigyikes:

The number is ridiculous number, and Protestants, for all your talk about thinking for yourselves, using your own reasoning and God given brains,-how could you let pass what you knew in your gut was just not right? . 😊

That number,** 33,000 Protestant denominations** comes from a single source…who either doesn’t understand the concept of Church, Denomination or communion; whose research/ record keeping is more anecdotal, eccentric collector / hobbyist than a scientist; . Whatever his story, he is really annoying the heck out of me.

Source:

He is the single source of the 33,000 number; you will not find another independent source which duplicates his numbers;
The reason they are so out of whack is because he either never knew, or decided to r
edefined the word “denomination”,to fit his style of research.

Unfortunately the mainstream media who are ignorant about all things Christian, and wouldn’t know Holy Oil from snake oil, keep using his numbers like they were gospel truth-this includes Encyclopedia Britannica, World Almanac, innumerable journalists, and not a few Catholic Apologists (who really should know better).

HERE’S THE SECRET TO THE 33,000 Protestant denominations.
He redefined the word denomination (I’m being kind, there’s another word for what he’s done, and if it was in field that depended on his research to make life and death decisions, the man would be in prison).

A denomination is defined in this Encyclopedia as an organized aggregate of worship centers or congregations of similar ecclesiastical tradition within a specific country; i.e. as an organized Christian church or tradition or religious group or community of believers, within a specific country, whose component congregations and members are called by the same denominational name in different areas, regarding themselves as one autonomous Christian church distinct from other denominations, churches and traditions. As defined here, world Christianity consists of 6 major ecclesiastico-cultural blocs, divided into 300 major ecclesiastical traditions, composed of over 33,000 distinct denominations in 238 countries, these denominations themselves being composed of over 3,400,000 worship centers, churches or congregations.”
(Barrett et al, volume 1, page 16, Table 1-5.)

So the 7 groups making up the Anglican “ecclesiastico-cultural mega-blocs”(btw, not to shabby for not bad in it’s 500 year history) are not 7 denominations;
Each individual country gets it’s own count; even if the Churches are part of a single body in communion, theologically and organizationally. If there is one in Australia and one in Bolivia, (kind of like there are Catholic Churches in many countries , each is counted separately.
So instead of 7 Anglican-type communions, there are 168.

AND THE ROMAN CATHOLICS GET THE SAME TREATMENT; if you bother to check, you would find out that you are not a the “One Holy Catholic Church” but , according to his way of accounting, the Roman Catholic Church consists of 236 denominations in the world’s 238 countries. And that number doesn’t even take into account the schismatic/dissenting groups mentioned in previous posts.

Are you beginning to see how this Math is going?
Here’s the long and short of it-

The 33,000 are subdivided into “6 major ecclesiastico-cultural mega-blocs”, and ordering them by denomination size we have the figures for the year 2000:
Code:
* Independents (about 22000)
* Protestants (about 9000)
* "Marginals" (about 1600)
* Orthodox (781)-most of which are in communion with each other
* Roman Catholics (242)
* Anglicans (168)
So the 33,000 number is from the total of these 6 mega-blocs:

22000 + 9000 + 1600 + 781 + 242 + 168 = 33,000+

From a Review by from Richard N. Ostling, Associated Press, 19 May 2001:

… Barrett has doggedly visited most of the lands in person, collecting raw material, including national census figures and United Nations data, and recruiting the 444 specialists who feed him material. Among them: Vatican missions librarian Willi Henkel and editor J. Gordon Melton of the Encyclopedia of American Religions. Barrett’s encyclopedia sought to count each human being in each religion and religious subcategory in each country as of 1900, 1970, 1990, 1995 and 2000, with projections to 2025.
Is he a Protestant or a Catholic or what?
 
So, what we need to do, then, is divide the 33,000 by 238, and then subtract one (for the Catholic Church) to get the number of non-Catholic ecclesial organizations that are in the world.

If we do that, we actually get 137 non-Catholic Christian organizations. That actually sounds way more plausible, to me. 🙂
 
So, what we need to do, then, is divide the 33,000 by 238, and then subtract one (for the Catholic Church) to get the number of non-Catholic ecclesial organizations that are in the world.

If we do that, we actually get 137 non-Catholic Christian organizations. That actually sounds way more plausible, to me. 🙂
I would say the number to divide is 9000. The reason is that the largest group of “churches” are the independents. Generally they are congregations that view church structure as being focused on the local church and not a larger denomination. They are basically units of one congregation. They don’t necessarily have differences of doctrine.
 
I would say the number to divide is 9000. The reason is that the largest group of “churches” are the independents. Generally they are congregations that view church structure as being focused on the local church and not a larger denomination. They are basically units of one congregation. They don’t necessarily have differences of doctrine.
So, then we get 38 Protestant denominations - plus 22,000 “independents,” plus 1600 “marginals” (I’m assuming this refers to non-Trinitarians groups that self-identify as “Christian”) - and then we have 5 Orthodox groups, 7 Anglican groups, and 1 Roman Catholic Church.

This total comes out to 23,650, in this case.

PS: edit - these figures don’t account for schismatic “catholic” groups, though. There are at least six of these that I know of - and there are probably more than that.
 
Gentlemen,

What’s 10,000 adherents between a religion!

LMCBO!

See that?

In order for you to even get a number,
you had to divide, divided, divide.

Don’t sound like “one, holy, catholic and apostolic…” to me.

LOL!
 
Gentlemen,

What’s 10,000 adherents between a religion!

LMCBO!

See that?

In order for you to even get a number,
you had to divide, divided, divide.

Don’t sound like “one, holy, catholic and apostolic…” to me.

LOL!
You’re so funny!! 😛
 
estesbob;3151580:
2ndGen;3151545:
I’ll challenge you in the same spirit I was challenged:

Do you genuflect and make the sign of the cross to get that reaction? Cause if you do, “you have already received your reward.” 🙂
I do it becuase I have made the sign of the cross before praying my whole life. But then thats a tradtion and when one is making up things as they go along traditoins dont count for much.
 
I wanted to come back to this question, especially as several other posts referred to Messianic Jews as a denomination. Generally speaking, a denomination will build churches that identify themselves; for example, Methodist, Nazarene, Assembly of God, etc. I have not seen a church identifying itself as Messianic Jew.
You probably haven’t seen any messianic synagogues (not churches), because most are rather low-profile. Many exist throughout the United States and the world (not just around New York), though I don’t know exactly how many exist. Some congregations do share bldg. space with churches, but many do not. My experience with Messianic Jews is that they are an incredibly diverse group. In other words, there’s no such thing as a “stereotypical Messianic Jew” - though many ppl have assumed they know/understand them because they’ve met a few.
 
Bear fruit that befits repentance, and do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father’; for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham"

I find the arrogance and presumption here very sad.
Why worry about any inaccuracies or slander against the Protestant faith, they are so far off the mark, how could it possibly make any difference if we were a little off with some facts.
Whenever someone corrects something I had misunderstood or misquoted, I just say thank you.

I am concerned at your lack of concern.
And as to wondering why no one is posting over on the thread that wonders why we can’t all get along

It should be a wake up call to how people feel they have been treated here, and it only seems to be getting worse,

You probably don’t even know the large number of wise and holy voices that have been silenced or have just left over the last 2 months. And it is a great loss to you, whether you know it or not.

The arrogance and presumption of the Jews played a major role in the Jews not only recognizing and listening to John, and from recognizing Christ as the Son of God, or if they did, preferred to not let Him rock their comfortable unsinkable boat.

Not much of a stretch to hear these words echo back :
We have the guarantee of the infallibility of the See of Peter, and the promise of never falling into error. Let the Gates of Hell do their worst, they will not prevail…but as John said, essentially, you cannot presume on the Mercy of God, now that you’ve got His Promises, He has to honor them, so you don’t have a care in the world, not like us poor non-catholics…but in the spirit of John’s words: God is able from these stones to raise up adherents to the Roman Catholics Faith.

(I get the feeling you think Protestants and/or Orthodox are as dense, stupid and immovable as rocks)
 
They are not actually Jews, themselves - they are Gentiles who follow the Jewish liturgical year and Jewish dietary laws, etc., in aid of worshipping Jesus. They have also put out quite a bit of literature.
I am not even sure how to reply to the above :banghead:

It is simply … well, … one of the most utterly misinformed things I’ve ever read.😦
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top