Why sola scriptura is flawed

[JMJ_coder]

Divine Revelation comes to us via three ways - Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition, and the Magisterium. Without all three it all fails. Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition together form the Deposit of Faith, either one is incomplete without the other. The Magisterium is need as an authentic and authoritative interpreter of that Deposit of Faith. If one is missing, the other two fail. They are intimately reliant upon each other.

Thus, sola scriptura, divorcing itself from two of the three, completely fails and it’s not even Scripture anymore. Without the fullness of the Deposit of Faith and the authentic and authoritative interpreter of the Magisterium, it fails. That is way sola scriptura and private interpretation are lies created by the original liar, the murderer from the beginning and master deceiver, Satan.

 

[TriuneUnity]

Divine Revelation comes to us via three ways - Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition, and the Magisterium. Without all three it all fails. Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition together form the Deposit of Faith, either one is incomplete without the other. The Magisterium is need as an authentic and authoritative interpreter of that Deposit of Faith. If one is missing, the other two fail. They are intimately reliant upon each other.

Thus, sola scriptura, divorcing itself from two of the three, completely fails and it’s not even Scripture anymore. Without the fullness of the Deposit of Faith and the authentic and authoritative interpreter of the Magisterium, it fails. That is way sola scriptura and private interpretation are lies created by the original liar, the murderer from the beginning and master deceiver, Satan.

:yawn:

 

[cath2lic4ever]

Divine Revelation comes to us via three ways - Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition, and the Magisterium. Without all three it all fails. Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition together form the Deposit of Faith, either one is incomplete without the other. The Magisterium is need as an authentic and authoritative interpreter of that Deposit of Faith. If one is missing, the other two fail. They are intimately reliant upon each other.

Thus, sola scriptura, divorcing itself from two of the three, completely fails and it’s not even Scripture anymore. Without the fullness of the Deposit of Faith and the authentic and authoritative interpreter of the Magisterium, it fails. That is way sola scriptura and private interpretation are lies created by the original liar, the murderer from the beginning and master deceiver, Satan.

True…JMJ_coder you rock (just like st. peter). GOD bless & prayers to all!

 

[love4mary]

What amazes me concerning Sola Scriptura is, after reading most all of what St. Paul wrote, it can still be believed.

St. Paul wrote (most of his letters anyway) to ESTABLISHED churches, correcting them in their faith when they went off a bit.

Before you say that there were many letters/writings of the Apostles floating around at that time that they could have learned from, ask your self this…Were all the letters/writings the same ones we now have in the bible? There were many writings being passed around like the Gospel of Thomas. In fact, hundreds of writings were around, but they were Not inspired writings.

For me, the “Bible Alone” is like being thirsty and getting Half a glass of water, it satisfies my thirst, but just barely. Within the Catholic Church, we have Sacred Scripture (our entire Mass can be found there btw) Sacred Tradition and the Magisteriam(sp) which is the teaching authority of Gods words to us. That is a FULL cup of water which Totally quenches my thirst.

Gladly have a FULL glass then a Half any time.

As an aside to this, it was through reading the bible that I came to understand more fully the truths of the Catholic Church.