Why the Book of Nephi?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spirithound
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Spirithound

Guest
As I understand the history of the LDS Church, Joseph Smith started translating the Book of Lehi, but those pages were lost, and God told him he couldn’t translate that book anymore, but to do the Book of Nephi, which was a different account of the same events.
This punishment seems a little weak to me. Why did God only allow JSmith to translate a different account of the same events?
 
Why do you think they call it the Book for Morons?
My friend, that’s a little harsh. I’m no fan of Mormonism, but it doesn’t seem productive or Christlike to ridicule them. We certainly don’t like it when Catholics are treated in a similar fashion.

Paul
 
Smith did not retranslate the material that Harris had lost because he said that if he did, evil men would alter the manuscript in an effort to discredit him. Smith said that instead, he had been divinely ordered to replace the lost material with Nephi’s account of the same events.[29] When he got to the end of the book, Smith was told that God had foreseen the loss of the early manuscript and had prepared the same history in an abridged format that emphasized religious history, the “Small Plates of Nephi.”[30] Smith transcribed these records, and they appeared as the first part of the book. When published in 1830, the Book of Mormon contained a statement about the lost 116 pages, as well as the Testimony of Three Witnesses and the Testimony of Eight Witnesses, who claimed to have seen and handled the Golden Plates.

Smith was afraid that if he translated the “golden plates” again and the lost manuscript turned up then he would be proven a faker. Now if God really translated the plates using Smith and his “seer stone” the manuscripts would be identical. Of course such is not the case as it was a fraud all along. How convient that “God” would put in the book of Mormon a notice about the missing papers to save Joseph Smiths behind. The LDS actually believe this but to us of a sane and rational mind we can see right through the hoax.
 
Why do you think they call it the Book for Morons?
Wow, even I thought that was harsh… and I’m the one who refers to LDS as the “Broken Branch of the Christmas Tree.” :ehh:

Ironically Yours, Blade and Blood
 
At first I thought that said “Book of Moroni”…
That particular punishment seems a little passive-aggressive: “No, you can’t read that book. But here’s one just like it.”
My God seems to either strike someone dead, or forgive them. Or something involving a large fish…

Any real LDSs want to enlighten?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top