It is interesting to read on this forum when catholics get offended .when Christians Protestant recognized . the difference.
- Catholics need a priest for confession
- Taught the real presence
3 pray to Mary and others
Non catholics don’t need these beliefs to have a relationship with God or Jesus.
This difference seems to create a rift .
Catholic bashing because praying to Mary
Or confessing to a priest.
Yes there are things that seem weird in every religious system?
You seem to misunderstanding a couple of things.
#1 - Non-Catholics do need those things, they just don’t realize it. From a Catholic perspective, what you’re saying is like a person saying they don’t need water because they don’t believe in dehydration. It doesn’t matter what they believe, if they don’t drink they’ll die.
#2 - The Catholic Church’s belief in these things isn’t what creates the rift. The rift was created back in the 1,500’s when a scrupulous monk thought he knew better than the collective theologians of 1500 years of Catholic thought, study, and practice.
While, strictly speaking, it’s true you can have a relationship with God without these things, it is an incomplete relationship, lacking in much of what Christ desires for it. Take confessing to a priest, for example. Jesus gave us that as a gift, not to impose on us, but to free us. When a Catholic hears those words from a priest, “I absolve you of your sins…” they
are forgiven. It is not a subjective feeling, it’s not a hope, it’s not a belief. It’s a concrete reality born of the nature of the sacrament. In Protestantism, you can believe you’re forgiven all you want (and I sincerely hope that you are,) but there are no assurances. You won’t actually
know until you come face to face with God. If, for some reason, you weren’t forgiven when you thought you were, it’s too late at that point.
The same is true of all of these other things you find confusing / off-putting. They are gifts of Christ to His Church to help us on our path to salvation.
As for
why they’re different, it’s because some people thought they knew better, and started removing books more than a millennium after the canon of scripture had been settled. (The official list of Biblical Canon was determined in 313a.d., and remained constant in the western world until the 1500’s, with the second or third edition of the King Jame’s Bible. It wasn’t Catholic Bibles that changed, as many people like to purport. We have more than enough evidence of that.)