C
Cat_Herder
Guest
Because you are required to call her blessed before everyone. That includes God.Why should I pray the HM?
Because you are required to call her blessed before everyone. That includes God.Why should I pray the HM?
That, Gary, is the most important thing you’ve said in this thread. :extrahappy:Yet through Gods interevention with Anne this is without doubt possible.
Fair enough.She did not have to be sinless and I don’t see how her being sinless would be fitting either.
Nope, Gary. Not even close to what I’ve been saying. :nope:I “think” I may have misunderstood what PR was talking about with Mary. I assume he’s referring to Mary remaining sinless through life is not required.
GOOD POINT:thumbsup:Fair enough.
It makes one wonder, though, why God gave such explicit instructions for the materials to be used in the building of the Ark of the Covenant in the OT.
Any old piece of wood would have been fine for the Divine Presence, eh?
Calling her blessed in front of the Lord does not require me to say a prayer directed towards her (addressing her).Because you are required to call her blessed before everyone. That includes God.
Your prayer is directed by her, and the other saints, whether you like it or not. That’s just how heaven works…Calling her blessed in front of the Lord does not require me to say a prayer directed towards her (addressing her).
I make it a point not to comment on Revelation. At all. I will however take this offer and turn it into one that I can answer to:Your prayer is directed by her, and the other saints, whether you like it or not. That’s just how heaven works…
No, Paul does not say that. Let’s go through your cites one by one.All believers are saints.
“Called to be” =/= “are”“To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.” Romans 1:7
This tends to support the Catholic view that sanctification is seldom completed on earth. If Paul was completely sanctified he wouldn’t have made this statement.“Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ;” Ephesians 3:8
Again, the saints are in the process of being perfected.“And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:” Ephesians 4:11-12
You are missing the tie between “believer” and “saint,” aka salvation by faith alone–which is not in the Bible.The people Paul calls saints are all believers in Jesus Christ.
Yes, there are saints on earth. But this is a red herring. The saints being referred to in Revelation are both the ones on earth who supplied the prayers/incense (the Church Militant), and the elders performing service and worship to the Lord (the Church Triumphant)."Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem."Acts 9:13
“And it came to pass, as Peter passed throughout all quarters, he came down also to the saints which dwelt at Lydda.” Acts 9:32
“And he gave her his hand, and lifted her up, and when he had called the saints and widows, presented her alive.” Acts 9:41
“Which thing I also did in Jerusalem: and many of the saints did I shut up in prison, having received authority from the chief priests; and when they were put to death, I gave my voice against them.” Acts 26:10
I have given you numerous sources in which the believers are mentioned as saints. My point is that the saints prayers are going up to God. Our prayers being heard by Him.YYes, there are saints on earth. But this is a red herring. The saints being referred to in Revelation are both the ones on earth who supplied the prayers/incense (the Church Militant), and the elders performing service and worship to the Lord (the Church Triumphant).
The Bible does not say that only believers are saints or even that people are saints only because they are believers. Both are conclusions that do not follow from your premise.I have given you numerous sources in which the believers are mentioned as saints.
Through human beings in heaven.My point is that the saints prayers are going up to God.
Amen.Our prayers being heard by Him.
In contrast, I've come to believe, after years of questioning, reading, inquiry and the like, that Christianity was badly tainted by paganism early in its history. Once it moved beyond the Holy Land it picked up various strains from the Greco-Roman world, especially the Roman Empire. including an emphasis upon a virgin goddess, central in important faiths at that time around the Mediterrean Sea - Greece, Roman, Egypt, etc.
This resulted in the rise of the cult of the Virgin Mary, growing quite powerful by about 200-250 AD. Lots of traditions gradually invaded Christianity that would have shocked Jesus (in my view). Monotheism became compromised with the Mary cult, which elevated her far above anything suggested in the Bible. All sorts of doctrines amd folklore re Mary became central to the faith. We have no scriptural reference to her parents, for example - Anne and Joachim, according to legends that gradually became dogma.
The real issue here is authority. Devout Catholics accept whatever their church says, and I understand that. There are moments when that can seem attractive, as it doesn't compel me to evaluate, reason or question but be a loyal member of the tribe and simply believe and defend whatever the church teaches. Say whatever you will (normally such people as me are accused of egotism in one form or another), I find too much in Catholicism that seems pagan and primitive and out of sync with modern and rational thinking.
This bothers me. But what also troubles me is that there is so much good in Catholicism today, especially in its concern for the poor, its educational and medical facilities serving all, and other laudable efforts and projects. It saddens me that I find myself unable to accept the mythology that crept into and corrupted Catholicism. Frankly, I find that many of my Catholic or ex-Catholic friends feel similarly. Some continue to attend mass faithfully because of family or friends or cultural ties or a particular priest whom they like. Others have become cafeteria Catholics may who show up Christmas and Easter. Others have become liberal Protestants, which I fully understand. Some have become sola scriptura Protestants, which I don't understand - trading one absolute authority for another. Many have simply decided that what they regard as an ancient religion has become more-or-less irrelevant and spend Sunday mornings involved with family, in recreation or watching all those informative programs on TV.
But God bless everybody. Christianity has such a checkered history - sadly - and so often has betrayed Jesus while proclaiming his name and claiming to follow him. Let's work together to make religion a bridge instead of a barrier. I am ready and eager to respect those who are traditional in their views, including Catholics, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox and others. I am respectful, as well, of moderate Islam, and of honest Hindus and Buddhists, etc. The arrogance and even bitterness that sometimes pervades threads here on CAF needs to be tempered by a spirit of reconciliation and mutual respect, greater understanding, and a desire to mirror the love commanded and exhibited by Christ.
Perhaps we'll 'see you' on another thread? Meanwhile, Godspeed.
You’re on to something. The Jews had ablution, blood sacrifice, the Bread of the Presence, a priesthood, etc.I’m saying adieu to this thread as it seems pointless to keep making the same point.
As may be obvious by now, though I have a mixed Catholic/Protestant heritage, I am bending toward a liberal "big tent’ view of Christianity. In brief, this means that my focus continues to be on Christ and his basic teachings, but over the years I have been increasingly skeptical of what seem to me to be ‘pagan influences’ within Christianity. The CC often presents itself as continuing and fulfilling, as it were, the essentials of Judaism, adding, of course, the messiahship of Jesus.
By your logic Isaiah was a cultist of this virgin.Code:In contrast, I've come to believe, after years of questioning, reading, inquiry and the like, that Christianity was badly tainted by paganism early in its history. Once it moved beyond the Holy Land it picked up various strains from the Greco-Roman world, especially the Roman Empire. including an emphasis upon a virgin goddess, central in important faiths at that time around the Mediterrean Sea - Greece, Roman, Egypt, etc.
The Holy Spirit said all generations will call her blessed. By the way, if the church was compromised so soon, then is Jesus a liar?Code:This resulted in the rise of the cult of the Virgin Mary, growing quite powerful by about 200-250 AD.
We have no scriptural reference to the end of the Temple rituals either. Did you go up to Jerusalem for the pasch this year?Lots of traditions gradually invaded Christianity that would have shocked Jesus (in my view). Monotheism became compromised with the Mary cult, which elevated her far above anything suggested in the Bible. All sorts of doctrines amd folklore re Mary became central to the faith. We have no scriptural reference to her parents, for example - Anne and Joachim, according to legends that gradually became dogma.
You are completely omitting the existence of converts who study the Bible and the evidence and come to the conclusion that the Church is what she claims to be.The real issue here is authority. Devout Catholics accept whatever their church says, and I understand that.
We invented science, you know.I find too much in Catholicism that seems pagan and primitive and out of sync with modern and rational thinking.
Nicely done and from the heart:thumbsup: I also spent time on that side of the river and heard enough anti Catholic sentiment to cause me to wonder about Catholic theology. A lot of study brought me where I should be…thankfully.If I may politely interject into this debate.
In the modern world, when somebody dies, its as if they cease to exist. They are spoken of in the past tense, they were alive once, but now they are dead, gone, they cease to exist. We print their obituaries in the newspaper, show old pictures or film of them and talk about OUR memories.
In the ancient world, and in many parts of the world today, this is unknown. To the Hebrews, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were just not some names in history, they were part of a Covenant that transcended time itself.
God called Himself the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. He is the God of the Living, not of the dead. Hebrew ancestors were NEVER spoken of as some forgotten point of history, but as a LIVING part of the Covenant.
In the early church, this thinking never changed.
When a Christian died in the Early Church, they ‘fell asleep’. They were never spoken of as just ‘dead’.
I lost my father in 1984, my mother in 1999. If I were still across the Tiber I would feel helpless in communicating anything to my parents. How much I miss them, how much I love them, how I wish I could speak to them again.
As an evangelical there was no hope in that, they were ‘cut off’ and probably in Hell since they died Catholic (this was made very clear to me by many a preacher). I am so glad those dark days are over.
Those who have gone on before us are more alive than ever! We have the hope of the resurrection, so our EXPECTATION is that we will see them again. The Church is more than we can physically see.
The Blessed Mother is our ‘connection’ to our loved ones who have gone on before us. I know when I pray the Hail Mary for my parents it will be recieved. When I ask her to send a message to my parents, or my grandparents, I know they recieved it because of our Blessed Mother.
I truly feel sorry for those who do not have this comfort. Because I know what it was like not to have it. And then have it restored to me. A weight had been lifted from my shoulders. I felt at peace for the first time in many years.
You can argue the theology until you grow hoarse or your fingers bleed from typing.
Until you see for yourself the love God gave us through the Blessed Mother, you’ll never understand.
But I pray someday you do.
[BIBLEDRB]2 Thessalonians 2:14[/BIBLEDRB]If everything is to be based off of the bible,
[BIBLEDRB]Jos 5:13-16[/BIBLEDRB]Christ alone should be venerated.
Please read your Bible.I’ve seen several catholic priest say that Mary is only venerated and not worship but the truth of the matter is, veneration is actually worship. A lot of stuff atrivuted to Mary by the catholic church has no scriptural backing which confuses a lot.
[BIBLEDRB]Revelation 5:8[/BIBLEDRB]My inlaws spend all night listening to tape that says countless time “Mary pray for us”.
She’s right.My mother inlaw actually said that Mary is the second eve as Jesus is the second Adam.
[BIBLEDRB]1 Corinthians 1:23[/BIBLEDRB]Mary receives veneration but Christ receieves persecution. He’s always seen on the cross looking wounded and pained while Mary looks happy and graceful.
Not the footnotes that cite the Bible.I’ve read cathcism and I know what am saying.
[BIBLEDRB]John 19:26-27[/BIBLEDRB]I worship in holy family but never converted or partake ib ant tradition. Mary has been given all the titles that Isis/semiremis was known with.in my opinion, if Christ was still alive, Catholics won’t recognize him as our saviour because he never venerated Mary or placed her above anyone of his disciples.
[BIBLEDRB]Exodus 20:12[/BIBLEDRB]He actually denied her several times knowing that s day shall come when his glory will be transfered to her.
[BIBLEDRB]Revelation 12:1-6[/BIBLEDRB]I can site a lot . Mary wad no angel or almighty being but a mere mortal and a sinful one too who actually asked fir salvation fron the lord.
She did not. The children are of another Mary.The Mary of the bible actually had children and lived a happy family life with Joseph but catholics Mary remained s virgin toll death just like semiremis.
Well if your point is that the Blessed Mother didn’t need be sinless in order for Christ to be sinless. What is, isn’t, could be, would have and should have is sort of contrary to what is. And if this isn’t the thinking, then enlighten us on your thoughts/beliefs. Because I fail to grasp what “your” thinking is?Mary HAD to be sinless in order for a sinless God
Agee’dNicely done and from the heart:thumbsup