T
Teflon93
Guest
I call Methodists “Methodists” despite disavowing their methods.
I call Baptists “Baptists” despite disagreeing with their baptismal rites and their lack of valid orders to perform the same.
I call Pentecostals “Pentecostals” despite the fact that they weren’t even around on Pentecost and engage in practices alien to the Early Church.
I call Episcopalians “Episcopalians” despite the fact that their bishops lack valid holy orders.
I call Orthodox “Orthodox” despite the fact that their orthodoxy is different than mine and errant IMO since 1054.
I call Presbyterians “Presbyterians” despite the fact that they lack valid orders to fulfill any such Church office.
I call Jehovah’s Witnesses “Jehovah’s Witnesses” despite my belief that they do not truly see God, having no Eucharist.
I call Lutherans “Lutherans” despite my belief that today’s Lutherans do not (thankfully) hew to the (Edited) doctrines of the heresiarch.
I call each by the name they indicate they are to be called, whether Word-of-Faither, Anabaptist, or Reformed Jew, when I know what that name is. It doesn’t mean I concede the tenets of their theology, doctrine, or dogma to be correct; it certainly doesn’t mean I acknowledge their spiritual authority.
So why is it that certain non-Catholics insist on using the “Roman Catholic” label despite being told:
I call Baptists “Baptists” despite disagreeing with their baptismal rites and their lack of valid orders to perform the same.
I call Pentecostals “Pentecostals” despite the fact that they weren’t even around on Pentecost and engage in practices alien to the Early Church.
I call Episcopalians “Episcopalians” despite the fact that their bishops lack valid holy orders.
I call Orthodox “Orthodox” despite the fact that their orthodoxy is different than mine and errant IMO since 1054.
I call Presbyterians “Presbyterians” despite the fact that they lack valid orders to fulfill any such Church office.
I call Jehovah’s Witnesses “Jehovah’s Witnesses” despite my belief that they do not truly see God, having no Eucharist.
I call Lutherans “Lutherans” despite my belief that today’s Lutherans do not (thankfully) hew to the (Edited) doctrines of the heresiarch.
I call each by the name they indicate they are to be called, whether Word-of-Faither, Anabaptist, or Reformed Jew, when I know what that name is. It doesn’t mean I concede the tenets of their theology, doctrine, or dogma to be correct; it certainly doesn’t mean I acknowledge their spiritual authority.
So why is it that certain non-Catholics insist on using the “Roman Catholic” label despite being told:
- It is inaccurate, since Eastern Rite Catholics are in communion with Rome and not Roman Catholics
- It is used often as a slur, part of the “Catholics are pagans” myth of old
- Some Catholics have objected to the use of “Roman Catholic”