PS,
How true!!!
:bowdown2::bowdown2::bowdown::bowdown:Who said so? That is your opinion that you have a right to. I know plenty who disagree.
CAIS is a physical syndrome with objective diagnostic criteria.
This is a great analogy. It points to an attitude that pervades this forum. Definitely one to think about.
SP,
and lets not forget that you can add this to the syndrome as well…
CAIS is not Gender Dysphoria according to the DSM IV…
and
It is possible that the propaganda machine for the Homosexual has hijacked this disorder to substantiate their propaganda but it does not bear out in reality…
Coptic,
Certainly I’m not the only one seeing a conflict here?
Kolbe,
Homosexual propaganda is based on no fact, no science and it is necessary to start providing evidence of lack of evidence…loud and clear
That makes sense enough.
Okay, you actually made me laugh out loud there.
That sounds SO much like an argument I’ve made to you over and over and over, with regards to the word homosexual. You’re so right, it is like language!Kolbe,That makes sense enough.
Okay, you actually made me laugh out loud there.
We actually agree on something!!! Someone call the authorities!!!
Happy Easter, Coptic.
She is agery that many disagree with her and that there is such a issue. I her ideal world people are from a cookie cutter, and can’t be theur real selves!
SP,She is agery that many disagree with her and that there is such a issue. I her ideal world people are from a cookie cutter, and can’t be theur real selves!
Gender issues asside you and I are from different bakeries from most people. believe me! You are more articulate than most people I know and I considered by most who know me personally to be very eccentric in many ways. You and I are not from a cookie cutter.
SP,Gender issues asside you and I are from different bakeries from most people. believe me! You are more articulate than most people I know and I considered by most who know me personally to be very eccentric in many ways. You and I are not from a cookie cutter.
Thats just an opinion. I’m a better pewrson for society if Im not a depressed not functioning male , but as a well adjusted( to the sight of the eye) conttent female. One has to make sure theyr’e well before helping othders. Case in point. Theres a young lady who has cerebral pulsy who I give much help to for transportation as well as help in other ways. If I were in bed depressed I’d not be much help to her. Her family is major dysfunctional and wont help her get to anything like church of her mothly meeting with a preist. If I were forced to live as a male I’m be home depressed or maybe deceased of my own doing.
SP,Thats just an opinion. I’m a better pewrson for society if Im not a depressed not functioning male , but as a well adjusted( to the sight of the eye) conttent female. One has to make sure theyr’e well before helping othders. Case in point. Theres a young lady who has cerebral pulsy who I give much help to for transportation as well as help in other ways. If I were in bed depressed I’d not be much help to her. Her family is major dysfunctional and wont help her get to anything like church of her mothly meeting with a preist. If I were forced to live as a male I’m be home depressed or maybe deceased of my own doing.
Catholics don’t fear suffering, even if it means that in our depression we are less useful, because that is how we are created…
Being usefull is a part of the works required along with faith to get into heaven. As for suffering I do plenty of that all gender issues aside. Ived passed 40+ kidneystones in my life, I know what both physical and non physical pain is. Anyway if there were a cure for the stones I;d bet you would approve of it. Look in Elizabeth502’s posts on these tg threads you should be able to find a post with a :secret Vatican document" on transsexuality that DOES approve of some sex change surgeries. So after reading that document one can’t surely say that the way Im living is sinful.
SP,
Kolbe,
I reject the DSM IV and DSM V, in fact I reject the entire notion of Gender Dysphoria…however to maintain a conversation, you have to enter the paradigm of the relevance of the discussion.
Why “transgender” is a lie…
Well first of all the DSM IV and V are Homossexual agenda driven
Believing that someone can wish anything that makes them other than what they are created for is nonsense…
To discuss anything you have to discuss it on the terms that those that believe that this is relevant has to be discussed in their terms…it is like language…
In order to discuss Protestant thought you have to know Protestant thought, understand Calvin, Luther, the history of the Bible…and even though I can discuss the beliefs, I don’t accept them and question them…as we know when discussing Sola Scriptura…
I can fold my hands and say…you are wrong, end of story…however if I know the paradigm and show the weakness of the paradigm then that causes someone to think…
Aquinas knew the opposition better than the opposition…and that is how he caused the opposition to abandon their faulty thinking…
I know the DSM as well as anyone. I know the paradigm of the 12 step religion of AA as well as anyone. That is how I am able to disagree and show the weakness of the paradigm…
You can’t convince anyone of anything unless you know what they know as well or better than they do or they remain unconvinced…
Do you know a better way?
It is my hope that others see the fallacy in thinking and start resisting and for that reason I posted…
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=769113
**The Reformation for Secular Homosexual thinking **
Homosexual propaganda is based on no fact, no science and it is necessary to start providing evidence of lack of evidence…loud and clear