S
starrs0
Guest
Why did Vatican II happen what was going on in the Church in the years before the council that John XXIII felt it was necessary to convene it?
awalt said:1) The Council produced 16 documents some of which are described as the greatest expressions of Catholic social teaching in church history.
- Increased participation by the laity distinguishes Catholic life after the Second Vatican Council. Bible study groups, Marriage Encounter, social action organizations, and the charismatic renewal movement are all fruits of the Council.
- Since Pope John XXIII spoke of “opening the windows of the Church” great and gradual changes have occurred.
The problem is you are asking the wrong question. Pope John XXIII was concerned about a number of issues, both within and without the Chruch. Those inside the Church included the dwindling number of people attending Mass in Europe (they were about 20 years ahead of the United States with regard to this problem) and the problem arising in Holland with regard to catechesis and a “liberalization” of the Church. Those events outside the Church included the development of a “world village” as a result of television, increasing secularization, and a rising sense (provided by the bishops in ther ad limina visits) that the Church was no longer speaking to the people. She had become simply another source of “noise” as people began to do what they wanted.Ok I get all that but that still doesn’t answer my question why did all these things happen what was going on in the Church to provok this kind of reform? I need specifics.
That is a question that has never really been answered. There are many theories, mostly conspiratorial in nature, that address the issue. Archbishop Bugnini comes to mind and the whole freemason debate. My own personal opinion is that the Holy Father felt the time was ripe for the Church to move into the future, to boldy go where no man has gone before as it were. After all, he was, at least in theory, a transitional Pope and maybe wanted to be sure he left a legacy. Most people can’t name more than a couple of the Popes, and even fewer can tell you what they did. Not so in his case. So maybe he found a way to make his mark so to speak. Who knows?Ok I get all that but that still doesn’t answer my question why did all these things happen what was going on in the Church to provok this kind of reform? I need specifics.
Boy and they got it didn’t they.
- I guess they needed a higher participation of the laity, considering that Post V2, our number in priestly and religious vocations has plummeted in frightening numbers.