Why Worship God?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cruxis117
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Cruxis117

Guest
This is a question I’ve been asked on Facebook. I’ve discussed and debated on this topic, however I’m hoping that someone else has good arguments which support the fact that we should worship God.

One comment which basically elaborates on the position of the opponent I am debating:
Well Cruxis, whether or not Einstein gave us life (this is the analogy that we are like ants and Einstein is God), Einstein would not blame an ant for biting him. Especially knowing that ants bite and are stupid. What I was getting at was not whether an ant could succeed in killing a man, but rather whether it would be justified in trying, even if the attempt was futile.

And your analogy with the wife (that the wife is killing us with bug spray and that Einstein saved us, I don’t mean this as a sexist remark, but just an analogy to make a point) is getting a bit too far fetched. I see no evidence that god, if he exists, is protecting humans from anything. Check out the 4000 children dying from starvation every hour and see if you disagree. This is not to mention cancer, aids, murder, rape, natural disasters. No, god doesn’t seem to be concerned with our protection one bit.
 
We only worship God in spirit and truth as we come to* know* Him. To know God is to know of His supremer “value”-to know His goodness and most importantly to know His love.
 
Here’s how I would argue it. The goal of life is to be happy, come out on top, etc. Life on Earth will not give us this goal (at least not for an extended time and definitely not for eternity). If God rules everything and can give us this joy, then our best hope is to follow and worship him. So, we are like animals compared to God. So, we can either be complacent happy dogs and let God be kind to us, or we can be rabbid creatures which God will throw out into the unknown where we will not find happiness because he is not going to endure our rebellion against him forever. Besides it is stupid to rebel against God. It would be like a baby going against the army. It will also not leave us happy, better off, justified, etc.

And anyways God deserves our worship. He keeps us in existence. He created us, he allows us to wake up every day. We have all sinned and all deserve death, the fact that He allows our existence to carry on is the greatest form of mercy. But, if your friend wants to rebel against God, he needs to at least no that he won’t find peace in the next life.
 
This is a question I’ve been asked on Facebook. I’ve discussed and debated on this topic, however I’m hoping that someone else has good arguments which support the fact that we should worship God.
Please define “worship” as you mean it in this discussion.
 
Here’s how I would argue it. The goal of life is to be happy, come out on top, etc. Life on Earth will not give us this goal (at least not for an extended time and definitely not for eternity). If God rules everything and can give us this joy, then our best hope is to follow and worship him. So, we are like animals compared to God. So, we can either be complacent happy dogs and let God be kind to us, or we can be rabbid creatures which God will throw out into the unknown where we will not find happiness because he is not going to endure our rebellion against him forever. Besides it is stupid to rebel against God. It would be like a baby going against the army. It will also not leave us happy, better off, justified, etc.

And anyways God deserves our worship. He keeps us in existence. He created us, he allows us to wake up every day. We have all sinned and all deserve death, the fact that He allows our existence to carry on is the greatest form of mercy. But, if your friend wants to rebel against God, he needs to at least no that he won’t find peace in the next life.
I wonder if this response to the OP is given as an argument his/her opponent would understand, or if it is what you actually believe. That is because it seems unusual to me to say that the goal of life is “to be happy, come out on top,” especially for a Catholic. I thought the goal of life is to make others happy by caring for them, alleviating their suffering, and loving them. Not that our personal goal should be suffering; but on the other hand, suffering for a noble cause is not something to be avoided necessarily. Isn’t that part of the Catholic perspective? I agree more with your second paragraph, except for your final statement that the OP’s friend won’t find peace in the next life if they rebel against G-d. This too seems to be opposed to what Catholicism teaches by judging others without sufficient knowledge. Is this statement also for the benefit of the person who is arguing against the proposition that it is essential to worship G-d; in other words, so that they will understand what you’re saying. Nonetheless, arguing in favor of a position which is not consistent with Catholic teaching doesn’t seem to be the best way to do it.
 
I wonder if this response to the OP is given as an argument his/her opponent would understand, or if it is what you actually believe. That is because it seems unusual to me to say that the goal of life is “to be happy, come out on top,” especially for a Catholic. I thought the goal of life is to make others happy by caring for them, alleviating their suffering, and loving them. Not that our personal goal should be suffering; but on the other hand, suffering for a noble cause is not something to be avoided necessarily. Isn’t that part of the Catholic perspective? I agree more with your second paragraph, except for your final statement that the OP’s friend won’t find peace in the next life if they rebel against G-d. This too seems to be opposed to what Catholicism teaches by judging others without sufficient knowledge. Is this statement also for the benefit of the person who is arguing against the proposition that it is essential to worship G-d; in other words, so that they will understand what you’re saying. Nonetheless, arguing in favor of a position which is not consistent with Catholic teaching doesn’t seem to be the best way to do it.
Yes, I was trying to adapt pascal’s wager to the situation and make it appeal to an atheist’s senses. I don’t believe we are trying to simply play a game and beat out God.

And my last paragraph is perfectly in line with Catholicism. If you sin and work against God your whole life, then you can’t expect to go to Heaven. If you openly oppose God and say He isn’t worthy of worship, then you will not become one with God in Heaven. If you refuse to repent and ask for God’s forgiveness, how can you accept his mercy and enter into Heaven. God let’s us choose where our souls end up through our decisions to worship and repent and to not rebel. God will give this man what he wants. If he chooses to rebel, he wants eternal seperation from God (which is Hell) and God will give it to him.
 
I wonder if this response to the OP is given as an argument his/her opponent would understand, or if it is what you actually believe. That is because it seems unusual to me to say that the goal of life is “to be happy, come out on top,” especially for a Catholic. I thought the goal of life is to make others happy by caring for them, alleviating their suffering, and loving them. Not that our personal goal should be suffering; but on the other hand, suffering for a noble cause is not something to be avoided necessarily. Isn’t that part of the Catholic perspective? I agree more with your second paragraph, except for your final statement that the OP’s friend won’t find peace in the next life if they rebel against G-d. This too seems to be opposed to what Catholicism teaches by judging others without sufficient knowledge. Is this statement also for the benefit of the person who is arguing against the proposition that it is essential to worship G-d; in other words, so that they will understand what you’re saying. Nonetheless, arguing in favor of a position which is not consistent with Catholic teaching doesn’t seem to be the best way to do it.
I think Heuchler was stating, correct me if I am wrong Heuchler, the “argument from desire”, in reducible terms. That nothing truly satisfies our lives in this world, but the desire to fulfill that need and to feel happy and satisfied does exist. In a sense, Heuchler is right that our goal is to fully realize our happiness, the way to go about that is to do His will. “You arouse us so that praising you may bring us joy, because you have made us and drawn us to Yourself, and our heart is unquiet until it rests in You” (St. Augustine). As a Catholic to a Jew, we can both fully agree that His will for us is “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with thy whole heart, and with thy whole soul, and with thy whole strength” (Deut 6:5).

Cruxis, if your asking me as a philosopher I will reply, we should worship Him to actualize our true potential and to complete our essence and only through Him, in Him, and with Him can that be accomplished in Heaven. As theologian I will quote you Scriptures like Rev 14:7 why one should worship God. But personally we should worship God because it is the highest expression of love. And I want to give that to the One who created me because He loved me enough to create me despite the sins I would commit before coming to know Him.
 
I see no evidence that god, if he exists, is protecting humans from anything. Check out the 4000 children dying from starvation every hour and see if you disagree. This is not to mention cancer, aids, murder, rape, natural disasters. No, god doesn’t seem to be concerned with our protection one bit.
It seems like some people expect God to be some type of babysitter, making sure people don’t misbehave, and smite murderers and rapists on the spot (I bet they’d complain about that too though); and rain down free food to all when in reality there already is enough food for everyone, and it is only us humans to blame for the corruption of the world.
This person does not see evidence because s/he is looking at only the negative and not the countless miracles that do happen. Oh but those can’t be “proven” either. 🤷
 
This is a question I’ve been asked on Facebook. I’ve discussed and debated on this topic, however I’m hoping that someone else has good arguments which support the fact that we should worship God.

One comment which basically elaborates on the position of the opponent I am debating:
…I see no evidence that god, if he exists, is protecting humans from anything. Check out the 4000 children dying from starvation every hour and see if you disagree. This is not to mention cancer, aids, murder, rape, natural disasters. No, god doesn’t seem to be concerned with our protection one bit.
It’s past time for bed, but I have a couple of thoughts. (I hope it comes out coherently!)
  1. Often I find that when people get involved in debates they neglect to identify their underlying assumptions. I see from the quote you provided that the unbeliever only considers the physical world. Has he/she been made aware that you are talking about the spiritual world and eternity?
    I say this because
  2. God (“if He exists”) is protecting us against eternal damnation. Eternal damnation is far, far worse than any of the physical evils that are described in the bit I’ve quoted above.
From the little I know of this discussion it sounds like an uphill battle in that you both have completly opposite world views. If your opponent can not understand that God sends things our way or allows them to happen for the good of our immortal souls, then there is a real problem right from the root of the debate.

If it helps at all I recommend Trustful Surrender to Divine Providence for your own edification. An atheist cannot relate to this, but it may help you better understand the Catholic POV and possibly lead you towards another line of reasoning.

Basically we worship God because He made us, He died for us, He knows every hair on our heads, He knows all and is all loving.
With His infinite Love and Knowledge he makes sure that what He sends us or what He allows to happen to us via someone’s sinfulness IS FOR THE GOOD OF OUR IMMORTAL SOUL. We may not be able to see this during our life here on earth as we do not see the whole picture. We are not here to be happy. We have to trust God in ALL situations.

I’m rambling. Goodnight.:sleep:
 
We worship God as an expression of our love for Him. We do not do it because we will get punished for not doing so. Those who think that way have trivialized the faith to the extent that all they see of the faith is rules and laws. We worship because we are at that state that we express our belief in Him, our gratitude for our existence, and express our love by valuing the love that He has shown us.

We worship God not because God needs to be worshiped. God loves us and wants us to partake in His life. Our worshiping is a foretaste of that life of perfect communion with God. We worship not for the sake of God but for our own sake, that we may be with God.
 
We worship God as an expression of our love for Him. We do not do it because we will get punished for not doing so. Those who think that way have trivialized the faith to the extent that all they see of the faith is rules and laws. We worship because we are at that state that we express our belief in Him, our gratitude for our existence, and express our love by valuing the love that He has shown us.

We worship God not because God needs to be worshiped. God loves us and wants us to partake in His life. Our worshiping is a foretaste of that life of perfect communion with God. We worship not for the sake of God but for our own sake, that we may be with God.
Precisely. Neither the fear of punishment nor the anticipation of reward should motivate our worship of G-d. It is done out of deep appreciation, communion, and love.
 
I wonder if this response to the OP is given as an argument his/her opponent would understand, or if it is what you actually believe. That is because it seems unusual to me to say that the goal of life is “to be happy, come out on top,” especially for a Catholic. I thought the goal of life is to make others happy by caring for them, alleviating their suffering, and loving them. Not that our personal goal should be suffering; but on the other hand, suffering for a noble cause is not something to be avoided necessarily. Isn’t that part of the Catholic perspective? I agree more with your second paragraph, except for your final statement that the OP’s friend won’t find peace in the next life if they rebel against G-d. This too seems to be opposed to what Catholicism teaches by judging others without sufficient knowledge. Is this statement also for the benefit of the person who is arguing against the proposition that it is essential to worship G-d; in other words, so that they will understand what you’re saying. Nonetheless, arguing in favor of a position which is not consistent with Catholic teaching doesn’t seem to be the best way to do it.
I think one main goal of life has to be happiness-it’s really an almost unconscious, automatic pursuit or drive. The question for us is how do we achieve it? As for Catholicism, the Catechism teaches that this desire is good-that it’s placed in man by God. There are many such references in the Catechism. The Sermon on the Mount also concerns this very matter and the Beatific Vision is said to produce ineffable happiness in man. I’d even venture to say that God must be happy by nature, and would have to wonder what good it would do for us to go around helping others if we didn’t ultimately end up happier-more well-off in some such manner, in the end.

To put it simply, I think happiness is part of mans integrity-and Gods’ desire for humans. We make ourselves miserable to one degree or another-but that was never meant to be true homeostasis for us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top