Why would a Pagan be Pro-Life?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jlw
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jlw

Guest
Why would a Pagan be Pro-Life?

By Sonya L Volkhardt

Chances are good this site surprised you in some way; there aren’t many prolife pagan websites out there. In fact, I typed “pagan AND prolife” into a search engine recently and found two. One of them was a broken link. So I think it’s fair to say, you probably haven’t seen all that many websites like this one. I hope it was a pleasant sort of surprise, at finding others who think like you do - if so, please, please see the link about submitting your own writing! (go here - pretty please!)

Of course, being realistic rather than indulging my fantasies of receiving piles and piles of prolife pagan essays, it’s more likely you’re either a pagan prochoicer or a Christian prolifer, looking at this site going “Huh? Why on earth would a pagan be prolife?”

Well, why wouldn’t a pagan be prolife?

There are reasons, of course, good and practical reasons. The first that pops to mind is the political climate here in the US; our social politics are still very much defined in Biblical and anti-Biblical terms.

A pagan is going to have a pretty hard time finding a candidate who supports genuine religious freedom and equality and also opposes abortion; for the most part, prolife politicians identify strongly with the so-called ‘religious right’. A pagan who sees nature as sacred and considers preserving the environment a top priority may have difficulty finding someone to vote for who wants to save both wetlands and unborn babies. Generally speaking, prolife politicians are fiscal conservatives, and fiscal conservatives tend not to be too big on anything that might inhibit businesses - like environmental standards. Good luck to you finding a prolifer to elect who considers human sexuality a natural and sacred thing, and supports comprehensive sex ed, while opposing abortion. And don’t hold your breath waiting for a member of our electorate to support gay rights and prenatal rights simultaneously.

The groups with political clout who are supportive of paganism and pagan causes - feminists who love the idea of goddess worship, environmentalists, civil rights groups - tend to be supportive of abortion rights. Abortion is part and parcel of the progressive ideology today; those who oppose abortion are deemed de facto enemies, whether they’re also feminist or ecologically minded or supportive of civil rights or not. Anyone who won’t jump on the pro-choice bandwagon is automatically tossed aside as a presumed Bible-thumper, or at the very least, an anti-woman control freak.

And then there’s the prolife movement itself; it’s not exactly welcoming of diversity. The director of the March for Life had a gay prolife group arrested last year for displaying a banner with the words “gay” and “lesbian” on it. Many mainstream prolife groups still use the term “pagan” as perjurative - “our pagan culture encourages abortion”, or something similar. A fair number of mainstream prolifers would be astonished by the idea that prolife pagans even exist.

Essentially, it’s easier to just go with the pro-choice flow than to alienate your allies, try to force alliances with your enemies, or attempt to find the rare group or candidate you can support without sacrificing a slice of your conscience.

And pagans are no less susceptible to the usual temptations of abortion than anyone else. We experience unplanned pregnancies, we go through times of financial difficulty where a new child might just break us, we cringe at the hard cases of rape or fetal disability along with everyone else.

So why should a pagan be prolife?

Because all of the aforementioned ought to be irrelevant, if we are serious in our beliefs.

While there are many, many pagan paths, the vast majority hold nature, and the natural order, and life itself to be sacred. We teach personal responsibility, not because we’ll be tossed into hell for disobedience, but because we see that there will be real-world, practical consequences if we don’t live carefully, thoughtfully, and respectfully on the Earth and amoung our fellow human beings. Many of us worship Goddesses, and hold fertility and sexuality to be sacred. We see all things interconnected and hold in reverence the cycles of the seasons, of light and dark, growth and death and rebirth. Some of us follow the Wiccan Rede, which tells us to “harm hone”. We’re given the admonition that whatever you do in this world, it will come back to you three-fold.

How, then, can we possibly justify abortion?
 
(continued…)

Abortion takes a human life; this is not a matter of ideology or dogma, but simple scientific fact. It causes irreparable harm to one who is entirely innocent and helpless, one of the greatest injuries one person can possibly inflict on another. It denies the gift of fertility and treats pregnancy as a disease and a weakness in women, rather than a strength and blessing. It says women themselves are weak, unable to cope with financial difficulty, unwilling to sacrifice for their children, victims of their society and their biology. Rather that respecting pregnancy as part of the cycle of human existance and the natural continuation of human sexuality, abortion reduces gestation to the level of a sexual hangover, an unwelcome side-effect, “getting caught”. It treats life as disposable, not inherently sacred and possessed of its own immeasurable value, but inherently useless and worth preserving only if someone wants it. Rather than acknowledging that every living thing, from the smallest and simplest to the greatest and most complex, has a unique and irreplaceable role in the natural balance of our world, it says that those who cannot fend for themselves can be tossed aside without consequence.

If we’re going to be honest with ourselves, we should admit we know the ideology behind abortion is at best disrespectful of women’s bodies and fertility, scornful of nature, immature in its view of responsibility. The best you can say of abortion rights, really, is that they allow free will - but the powerful always have the freedom to exercise their will, by virtue of their power. There is no question that in a pregnancy, the mother is the powerful one, with a natural responsibility to nuture and protect the dependent fetus. Why should the government ignore the natural bond and responsibility of mother to child, and instead proclaim that the mother may kill her child because of its dependency? If the government exists only to assert the so-called rights of the powerful, why do we need government at all?

We ought to encourage the government to see the fetus in the same way we would like the government to see religious minorities, or endangered species - as valuable and vulnerable and in need of protection. Because at its worst, the mentality behind legal abortion is no more or less than the same simple bigotry which is responsible for everything from the pillaging of our environment to the harrassment of minority religions - the simple inability to recognize a life unlike your own as actually being a real and valuable life.

Yes, standing up for the rights of the unborn can be quite inconvenient for us. It can even be frightening to be faced with the bigotry that, unfortunately, pervades the prolife movement. It can be frustrating to lack leaders who will support all our causes, who will see the unifying thread of respect for life and responsibility. It can be hurtful to be rejected and misunderstood even by friends, to be the odd one out even amoung the outcasts. Being prolife can leave us politically homeless, rejected and ridiculed.

But then, so can being pagan.

geocities.com/sonyaelflady/nrmain.htm
 
Interesting…the wican stuff and the comments about the “lack of diversity” within the pro-life ranks irked me, but beyond that, it is a window into how we can argue with the secular pro-abort who has NO understanding of Christ and respect for God’s hand in creation.
 
I have hope that one day this writer will stand before our Lord and ask “Lord, when did I see you helpless and defend you?” And He may reply “As often as you have done it for one of the least of these, you have done it for me.”
 
I am not surprised at all I feel that alot of people who dealve into paganism,witch craft ect. really are rebelling against what they see is hypocrisy from people.They see the system do not like it and go to an offshoot of society in rebellion.
 
40.png
Lisa4Catholics:
I am not surprised at all I feel that alot of people who dealve into paganism,witch craft ect. really are rebelling against what they see is hypocrisy from people.They see the system do not like it and go to an offshoot of society in rebellion.
And yet, the writer rebels against the curent culture to defend life…A rebel with [at least one decent] cause!
 
My favorite:
If we’re going to be honest with ourselves, we should admit we know the ideology behind abortion is at best disrespectful of women’s bodies and fertility, scornful of nature, immature in its view of responsibility. The best you can say of abortion rights, really, is that they allow free will - but the powerful always have the freedom to exercise their will, by virtue of their power. There is no question that in a pregnancy, the mother is the powerful one, with a natural responsibility to nuture and protect the dependent fetus. Why should the government ignore the natural bond and responsibility of mother to child, and instead proclaim that the mother may kill her child because of its dependency? If the government exists only to assert the so-called rights of the powerful, why do we need government at all?
 
40.png
jlw:
And yet, the writer rebels against the curent culture to defend life…A rebel with [at least one decent] cause!
People see the destructive nature and reality in this and sadly there are far too many silent people who should be speaking up.I see hope in these movements and the light of God in their misinformed hearts.We need to give them a supportive word about it and they will know they are not alone.God Bless
 
Five years ago I was a prolife pagan myself - and here I am now. Perhaps the writer of this article will follow the same path. 🙂
 
40.png
BlindSheep:
Five years ago I was a prolife pagan myself - and here I am now. Perhaps the writer of this article will follow the same path. 🙂
Exactly:D I see divine providence there:)
 
Well really, there is in fact a non-Christian or non-religious argument for prolife. It’s the taking of a human life, and most people already believe that one must not kill an innocent human being. Then it’s just a matter of acknowledging the humanity of the baby in utero. That’s what they won’t give way on, and they don’t want to look either. I mean, just visualizing what takes place in an abortion should tell a person that something ain’t right with it.

As I have said elsewhere, TV med shows show all sorts of grisly operations (most recently a series of surgeries to help a boy whose face was nearly destroyed by a huge tumor) but they do NOT show abortions. Hmmm, why? Because it might totally gross everyone out? And just why would it gross everyone out?

In a way I think we cop out when we fall back on the religious argument with the non-religious. It should be our motivation but not our sole argument. Even with one’s own kids, if you make the religious argument then all they have to do is say fine, I don’t believe all that any more, and so they’re off the hook psychically. Similarly, the nonbelievers dismiss us as fundie kooks.
 
caroljm36: In a way I think we cop out when we fall back on the religious argument with the non-religious. It should be our motivation but not our sole argument. Even with one’s own kids, if you make the religious argument then all they have to do is say fine, I don’t believe all that any more, and so they’re off the hook psychically. Similarly, the nonbelievers dismiss us as fundie kooks.
Great post Carol! I have been saying this for a long time. You have to speak THEIR language!! Beat them at their OWN game.
 
40.png
caroljm36:
As I have said elsewhere, TV med shows show all sorts of grisly operations (most recently a series of surgeries to help a boy whose face was nearly destroyed by a huge tumor) but they do NOT show abortions. Hmmm, why? Because it might totally gross everyone out? And just why would it gross everyone out? .
I was listening to Fr Frank Pavone’s program last night. His guest who runs something called Life Dynamics said that the abortion industry is VERY careful never to have an abortion video get out. Apparently one was done and fearing it would get into the hands of prolife folks all copies were destroyed. However they did get an audio tape of one of the late term abortion specialists describing the procedure. The tape is just chilling as the man describes how he grabs the child’s foot, pulls him through the birth canal until he has acces to the head, then he calmly discusses putting the sharp instrument through the baby’s brain. They said it’s like listening to Dr Josef Mengele.
40.png
caroljm36:
In a way I think we cop out when we fall back on the religious argument with the non-religious. It should be our motivation but not our sole argument. Even with one’s own kids, if you make the religious argument then all they have to do is say fine, I don’t believe all that any more, and so they’re off the hook psychically. Similarly, the nonbelievers dismiss us as fundie kooks.
Absolutely and I try very hard not to rely on Biblical passages or religious teachings when dealing with a secular proabort. Most of them are very liberal, very into human rights. The objective is to prove through science (not difficult) that the baby IS HUMAN and then it becomes a human rights issue. That some secular proaborts refuse to acknowledge this truth is frustrating but you can change minds with the right approach.

Lisa N
 
40.png
Maranatha:
Because the Holy Spirit works even within the most hardened of hearts.
:yup:
I loved the article and agree with it fully. I’ve seen many Christians say that choosing a Pagan path is an excuse to engage in promiscuous sex, take drugs, have abortions, etc…but if these people are actually practising the religions they claim to be, that is all wrong. An article like this points that out - at least on the abortion matter.
…but is a comment like this necessary? I certainly do not consider my heart to be hardened, and a comment like that could easily be made about Christians or people of any other religion.
 
40.png
BlessedBe13:
I loved the article and agree with it fully. I’ve seen many Christians say that choosing a Pagan path is an excuse to engage in promiscuous sex, take drugs, have abortions, etc…but if these people are actually practising the religions they claim to be, that is all wrong. An article like this points that out - at least on the abortion matter.
…but is a comment like this necessary? I certainly do not consider my heart to be hardened, and a comment like that could easily be made about Christians or people of any other religion.
It’s a teaching of the Catholic Church. All good comes from God. If you are not Christian but want to do good it’s because the Holy Spirit is working in you. If you follow these inclinations you may still get to Heaven even though you are not Christian.
 
40.png
caroljm36:
As I have said elsewhere, TV med shows show all sorts of grisly operations (most recently a series of surgeries to help a boy whose face was nearly destroyed by a huge tumor) but they do NOT show abortions. Hmmm, why? Because it might totally gross everyone out? And just why would it gross everyone out?
I totally agree with this and have asked the same question to quite a few folks. Did you see the ruckus about a year ago when a station in the UK was going to show an abortion on TV. I can’t remember the end result. I think they did show it, but it caused huge turmoil.
 
More ignorance and it sickens me.

First, I dont know of anybody who is ‘pro-abort’…Nobody wants to kill these unconceived children. Its not like we are evil people who want to kill unborn babies for fun. Its pro-choice.

The choice to stop the birth of a baby whose life will most likley be poor.

STop being so naive…The reason we dont see sites affiliated witht he key word “pagan” is who calls themselves pagan? Many of my atheist friends will argue on ends for pro-life. They have websites up of their own, and yet they dont label it “pagan pro life” merely Pro Life…

The entire essay ignores the fact, another theist mistake
 
40.png
OkeyDokei:
First, I dont know of anybody who is ‘pro-abort’…Nobody wants to kill these unconceived children. Its not like we are evil people who want to kill unborn babies for fun. Its pro-choice.

The choice to stop the birth of a baby whose life will most likley be poor.
What would you call a person who advocated legalized rape, saying “I don’t like rape, but I believe every man should have the right to choose”? What about someone who said “I don’t own slaves myself, but support the right of others to choose whether to own slaves”? Are these people “pro-choice” or are they pro-rape and pro-slavery? You may wish to use the euphamism “pro-choice” but don’t expect us to play along.
Incidentally, have you ever asked yourself why pro-aborts like yourself feel the need to hide behind a euphamism?
STop being so naive…The reason we dont see sites affiliated witht he key word “pagan” is who calls themselves pagan? Many of my atheist friends will argue on ends for pro-life. They have websites up of their own, and yet they dont label it “pagan pro life” merely Pro Life…
The entire essay ignores the fact, another theist mistake
You may not be aware that there is a religious movement which
refers to itself as “paganism” or “neo-paganism” based on ancient beliefs and rituals of various pre-Christian cultures. It includes the different traditions of Wicca , Santaria and similar practices. It is this the OP was referring to, not to atheism or non-Christians in general.
Enjoy your visit to Catholic Answers Forum, and if you have any questions, just ask! 🙂
 
40.png
BlindSheep:
What would you call a person who advocated legalized rape, saying “I don’t like rape, but I believe every man should have the right to choose”? What about someone who said “I don’t own slaves myself, but support the right of others to choose whether to own slaves”? Are these people “pro-choice” or are they pro-rape and pro-slavery? You may wish to use the euphamism “pro-choice” but don’t expect us to play along.
Incidentally, have you ever asked yourself why pro-aborts like yourself feel the need to hide behind a euphamism?

You may not be aware that there is a religious movement which
refers to itself as “paganism” or “neo-paganism” based on ancient beliefs and rituals of various pre-Christian cultures. It includes the different traditions of Wicca , Santaria and similar practices. It is this the OP was referring to, not to atheism or non-Christians in general.
Enjoy your visit to Catholic Answers Forum, and if you have any questions, just ask! 🙂
First, Both your metaphors are flawed, they harm a pre existing person, not a person who is going to exist.

SEcondly, that still doesnt matter, whatever paganism i was reffering to, still, one wouldnt title it “pagan pro choice”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top