B
BlindSheep
Guest
First of all, that was not the point of the metaphor - it was not about harming people, but about terminology. Say I favor allowing people to turn cartwheels in the street. I don’t do it myself - I can’t even if I wanted to - but I believe people should have that choice. Am I pro-choice, or pro-cartwheel? Or in other words, if you are pro-choice, does that mean you believe people should be allowed to make any choice at all - drive through red lights, smoke crack, rob banks and so on? If you don’t believe that, you’re not really pro-choice. It is specifically the choice of abortion you are defending - therefore, you are pro-abortion, whether you like the title or not.First, Both your metaphors are flawed, they harm a pre existing person, not a person who is going to exist.
Furthermore, abortion harms a pre existing person. Your denial of this shows that you are one of those people who defines “personhood” as something belonging to only some, not all, living human beings. You believe that there are human beings who do not have a right not to be killed, because they do not fit your definition of people. And what is that definition? I’ve heard them all - breathing, born, sentient, rational, independant, able to digest and excrete food? All tailor made to draw the line between those whose murder you want to excuse and those whose murder you consider wrong. All flawed in one way or another, as they excuse the murder, not only of a 0-12 week old embryo or fetus, but of the disabled, newborn babies, older feti, or others you surely would not advocate killing. You can surely come up with example after example, different wordings and red herrings without end, simply to cover up the fact that there are living human beings who you believe are disposable. That is the central issue,* that* is what you need to examine in your heart.
You mean prolife. Yes, they would. I should know, I used to be a pagan (a wiccan, to be specific), and they do refer to themselves as such.SEcondly, that still doesnt matter, whatever paganism i was reffering to, still, one wouldnt title it “pagan pro choice”