ahimsaman72:
It has everything to do with it. The Catholic Church uses historicity to bolster its position as being the church that Christ founded, so I imagine it has much to do with it!
right. the church uses the historicity of its traditions to demonstrate that it is the church founded by christ as opposed to other churches who make the same, but mistaken claim.
but what has that got to do with the origins of the concept of a punitive hell?
even if the church had ever said anything like “X is true because we are the first to have proposed anything like X as the truth” (and it hasn’t), that would just show that the church was wrong about being the first to make a certain pronouncement - it most emphatically
wouldn’t be at all relevant to whether that pronouncement was true or false.
ahimsaman72:
It came from pagan sources - doesn’t that mean anything? If you were given tainted meat wouldn’t you want to know where it came from so you wouldn’t buy it from there anymore??!?!??
but your initial point is precisely that the church is
the first organization to propose a hell of eternal punishment…right?
at any rate, you beg the question: what difference does it make who else said it? i mean, there were pagans who believed in one god, too. does that make monotheism false?
in short, the meat isn’t tainted. it just means that someone else stumbled across good, fresh, nourishing food even before there was good spiritual refrigeration, so to speak, to guarantee the freshness. what of it?
look, lots of people and religions have
some of the truth - it’s part of express catholic doctrine that god has made at least part of himself and some of his truths accessible to humanity via the light of natural reason, so
it’s to be expected that some people would stumble onto some of the truths some of the time in the long history of humanity…
more abstractly, you are making the logical error known as the
genetic fallacy, which makes the truth of a proposition a function of who says it. in fact, propositions are true or false depending on whether what they say about the world is actually that way…