T
TimeEntrance
Guest
I really don’t see what is so inherently wrong with fiat money or placing a reasonable interest rate on loans.While I appreciate the analogy, the difference we are in is that we can not continue to live as a member of the family and also opt out of the absurdity.
We also do not have one member of the family printing money and loaning it to the rest of the family with a rate of interest attached.
I would divorce myself and the rest of my family from the family member who forces us to borrow money from him that he himself prints and loands to us with an interest rate attached. I would then begin trading goods and services with members of other families, avoiding the use of the fiat currency that a member of my family and members of other families print and insist we use, with an interest rate attached, whenever possible. I would be risking having the individual member of my family and members of other families who print the money sending men with guns after me and taking away things that I own as well as risking having them put me in prison but this is what I would do.
God Bless,
Bill
I’m not one that views banks and bankers are the root of evil. I’m not against the Fed being a privately owned Central Bank either. In theory - and I say “theory” - one plus about a Central Bank being privately owned is that it makes it more difficult for the Federal Government to just up and finance wars it might like to join or initiate. Supposedly, in theory, it helps with some checks and balances. Now, whether or not that is 100% true in real life I can’t say.