Will we ever see another Catholic President?

  • Thread starter Thread starter donnyblake
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

donnyblake

Guest
It’s been 46 years since we elected one. Is our country too-far Protestant or anti-Catholic maybe, to see one anytime in the near future? We seem to have a great candidate in Sam Brownback but he doesn’t get much publicity. Any opinions?
 
Yes, eventually. It’s gotten to the point that being Catholic isn’t that big a deal any more.

Big question is, will he/she be a real Catholic, or a CINO?
 
I don’t think the vast majority of people care…at all. They are more concerned about the new Roman Catholic equivalent (in terms of people’s prejudices) and that is Mormons. Witness the polls on that issue and Romney.

Rev North
 
It’s been 46 years since we elected one. Is our country too-far Protestant or anti-Catholic maybe, to see one anytime in the near future? We seem to have a great candidate in Sam Brownback but he doesn’t get much publicity. Any opinions?
Have we ever really had one?

CDL
 
Have we ever really had one?

CDL
No.

And I’m not just saying that because Joe Kennedy (John and Robert’s father) stiffed my great-great-aunt on her last paycheck, either.😃

JFK was a sellout, and a lousy president. He was worse than Carter, for cryin’ out loud! He wouldn’t have gotten elected at all if American Catholics would bother to think, a habit that’s actually declined since then.
 
it is quite likely that given the high proportion of politicians who profess themselves Catholic, like Kerry, it could happen, but the number of faithful Catholics who live out their faith and adhere to her values in their voting and other actions fit on the head of a pin, so a real Catholic candidate who is unabashedly pro-life, pro-family, pro-morality and fosters the preferential option for the poor is unlikely to ever be elected or even to retain current elective office for long.
 
To be honest, I would rather vote for a non-Christian (non-Catholic or non-Protestant) who is truly pro-life (and can prove it from their activities and voting record) than elect a cafeteria Catholic like John Kerry or Nancy Pelosi. I think these people do more harm than good to Christianity and to our country. If they can’t submit to the authority and follow the rules of their own Church, then how can we expect them to submit to the Constitution or the laws?
 
It’s been 46 years since we elected one. Is our country too-far Protestant or anti-Catholic maybe, to see one anytime in the near future?
I don’t think that’s the problem. I think the problem is that the Northeastern power base that elected Kennedy has eroded. Successful candidates these days are more likely to come from the Midwest or the South.

Edwin
 
successful candidates will be determined more according to their views & accomplishments, rather than religion. as we can see how a muslim was elected into congress.

if you want a catholic president, make sure to you run a well qualified one. afterall most americans dont care about religion anymore.
 
It’s hard to see a true Catholic even getting into (and being successful in) politics.
 
It’s hard to see a true Catholic even getting into (and being successful in) politics.
so if you see a catholic in politics chances are he is a false catholic. in that case it wouldnt really matter whether or not you have a catholic president. any religion would do, as long as its not a muslim. 😃
 
so if you see a catholic in politics chances are he is a false catholic.
Of course, any time people start using the word “true” in that way it indicates that they are working with a subjective and basically useless definition of the word being modified:D

“True Catholic” here seems to mean “Catholic whose politics I like.”

Edwin
 
afterall most americans dont care about religion anymore.
I’m not sure what alternate universe you live in! But we are obviously speaking through a wormhole, since in my universe Americans are renowned throughout the Western world for their obsession with religion, and are regarded by some sociologists of religion (see Stark and Finke, The Churching of America) as having become on the whole more religious over the course of their history rather than less!

Ediwn
 
Americans are renowned throughout the Western world for their obsession with religion
Of course. Americans are just much more religious than any western nation. If its the majority it simply doesnt show. Instead what appears are too much crime, materialism and secularism.
 
Of course. Americans are just much more religious than any western nation. If its the majority it simply doesnt show. Instead what appears are too much crime, materialism and secularism.
Unfortunately, I am very far from convinced that being religious necessarily results in less crime or (in the practical sense) materialism. It may result in people salving their consciences by religious activity while living as they like the rest of the time. Being religious is not, in and of itself, the answer. Pursuing holiness is the answer–that logically includes “being religious” (though it is possible to pursue holiness without realizing this).

Edwin
 
It’s been 46 years since we elected one. Is our country too-far Protestant or anti-Catholic maybe, to see one anytime in the near future? We seem to have a great candidate in Sam Brownback but he doesn’t get much publicity. Any opinions?
John Kerry was the presidential nominee of one of the two governing parties in this country and he was Catholic. He lost because he was a lousy candidate and would have made an even worse president, not because he was Catholic.
 
John Kerry was the presidential nominee of one of the two governing parties in this country and he was Catholic. He lost because he was a lousy candidate and would have made an even worse president, not because he was Catholic.
Well, there was also him being a fake Catholic. You like posers? Me neither.
 
Unfortunately, I am very far from convinced that being religious necessarily results in less crime or (in the practical sense) materialism. It may result in people salving their consciences by religious activity while living as they like the rest of the time. Being religious is not, in and of itself, the answer. Pursuing holiness is the answer–that logically includes “being religious” (though it is possible to pursue holiness without realizing this).
That is true. There is no guarantee that one leads to the other. Only that one would ‘likely’ lead to the other. It also depends on the type of crime. There is also a good chance that a sinful person makes a show of religiousness.

The other thing to consider is the growing sense of secularism in the U.S. Creationism is defeated. Bibles banned from the Schools. God & the Bible openly insulted by Night shows. Look at the forums. Many americans show hatred for religion. And more.
 
That is true. There is no guarantee that one leads to the other. Only that one would ‘likely’ lead to the other. It also depends on the type of crime. There is also a good chance that a sinful person makes a show of religiousness.
And furthermore that a person with serious issues may well feel a greater need for God than someone else. This is often overlooked by people who talk about hypocrisy.

Jesus said that a physician comes not for the healthy but for the sick. No wonder the Church is full of sick people!

Edwin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top