1
12volt_man
Guest
No, it doesn’t answer the question. It is an attempt on your part to avoid the question.It fully answers your question. Are you truly not understanding why?
Actually, Jesus was speaking to His followers and said that they were the light of the world in the present sense, not that the church would, one day in the future, be the light of the world.Jesus said his Church would be “the light of the world.”
I agree. That’s why I am happy that I am a part of that church.This means that his Church will never be destroyed and will never fall away from him. His Church will survive until his return.
I am a part of that church, thank you.If you are not a member of that Church you are not a part of the church.
Again, this is simply dishonesty on your part.I’m not concerned with how anyone else who reads these posts responds to my assertion that you used Buddhism as a non sequitor to discredit the Church’s origins 2,000 years ago. “To thine own self be true”
Anyone who reads my post will see that, not only did I not equate Christianity with Buddhism, I also never “used Buddhism as a non sequitor to discredit the Church’s origins 2,000 years ago.”
I simply used Buddhism as an example of the faulty logic of claiming that the mere age of something makes it true.
I have affirmed many times here that the church was, indeed, established more than 2,000 years ago.
