C
CatholicLife
Guest
Can a woman be an acolyte?
The order of acolyte was eliminated in 1972. Before that time, though, it was not open to women.Can a woman be an acolyte?
Correct! You win! (someone give him a prize)Acolyte was (I’m 99% sure) one of the minor steps in Holy Orders and as such was only open to those seeking the priesthood.
Not all Deacon programs are the same. My program is 7 years. The neighboring diocese is 3 years. Ours requires Masters in Theology…theirs no degree at all.My understanding is upon completion of the third year of study for the Deaconage one becomes a instituted acolyte. Women are thus not accepted for this position.
But there is such a thing as a permanent instituted acolyte. It’s up to the conference of bishops to decide whether to have them or not. In Canada, the CCCB has decreed that only candidates to Holy Orders may be instituted as lectors or acolytes. In the US it varies by diocese.My understanding is upon completion of the third year of study for the Deaconage one becomes a instituted acolyte. Women are thus not accepted for this position.
Women may not serve in the capacity of the acolyte. The may serve as altar servers but that is different. For examples acolytes (the instituted ones) can purify the chalices while altar servers cannot do it.But there is such a thing as a permanent instituted acolyte. It’s up to the conference of bishops to decide whether to have them or not. In Canada, the CCCB has decreed that only candidates to Holy Orders may be instituted as lectors or acolytes. In the US it varies by diocese.
Women may serve in the capacity of acolyte if there are no instituted acolytes but they may not be instituted to the ministry.
Fair enough, but in that case neither can the average male off the street. They can both serve at the altar but not fulfill all the ministry of the instituted acolyte.Women may not serve in the capacity of the acolyte. The may serve as altar servers but that is different. For examples acolytes (the instituted ones) can purify the chalices while altar servers cannot do it.
You are 100% correct!Fair enough, but in that case neither can the average male off the street. They can both serve at the altar but not fulfill all the ministry of the instituted acolyte.
As far as I know, this is correct. Women may serve as altar servers just as they may serve as EMsHC, which is to say that all ministries open purely by reason of being fully initiated are open to both men and women.Fair enough, but in that case neither can the average male off the street. They can both serve at the altar but not fulfill all the ministry of the instituted acolyte.
Our program is 4 years. ThanksNot all Deacon programs are the same. My program is 7 years. The neighboring diocese is 3 years. Ours requires Masters in Theology…theirs no degree at all.
Lincoln doesn’t have a deacon program but they have instituted acolytes. Most deacon formation programs institute their men to Acolyte prior to their final year of formation. Most institute their men as lectors 2 years before ordination.
That is the only thing I am aware of that an instituted acolyte can do that a server or EMHC may not do. Actually they may purify all sacred vessels and not just the chalices.Women may not serve in the capacity of the acolyte. The may serve as altar servers but that is different. For examples acolytes (the instituted ones) can purify the chalices while altar servers cannot do it.
This sounds more like sacristan-of-the-day, selected from among people that the pastor has OKd as EMsHC.Thanks for the answers. The Reason I asked this was beacuse of this
cbsfa.org/liturgy__music0.aspx
Just scroll down to where it says
Ministry of Adult Acolyte
That is the same person that in the same page writes down:Thanks for the answers. The Reason I asked this was beacuse of this
cbsfa.org/liturgy__music0.aspx
Just scroll down to where it says
Ministry of Adult Acolyte
I wish people could get over this. Yes, “Eucharistic Minister” is not the best term for the role, but it is a common one, and when someone uses it that doesn’t mean we need to respond as though they had said “priest” and then feign puzzlement over how they could have had a female/teenage priest, etc. That’s just annoying.That is the same person that in the same page writes down:
"Eucharistic Ministry to the Homebound
Deacons and other members of the community visit the home- bound and take them the Eucharist. Training is provided."
It looks like that she does not understand that only a priest or bishop can be an Eucharistic Minister.
It is just improper use of ecclesiastical terms, and it is embarrassing that it is on the diocesan web site.