This is a thread in response to an allegation that women who do rise to power and influence through their work are by definition rabid feminists, anti-life, ungodly, immoral, or whatever other generalization you care to make. I point out that such generalizations are dangerous and not likely to be true. Such a comment about women CEOs, politicians etc. also implies that men in positions of power and influence are be definition ungodly, corrupt etc., an equally unsound generalization.
well… yikes. that is not what I thought.
There is a choice to be made in any decision. Choosing family vs work is the reality of women who rise to power and influence at work. I’d think it very unlikely you will find very many CEO ladies with 8 children for example. I don’t know that it makes them less holy or more ungodly. I DO know though that to attain that level of success in one area of their lives, another area must give way some. Best case, I would think they would have to use NFP carefully to avoid family/work conflicts that would put their career in jeopardy. I would also think the dh would either have to set aside his career or the couple would have to have LOTS of outside help from either family or paid nanies. The rise to success takes TIME. Lots and lots of time and energy. It requires a good deal of devotion and determination. While time is spent on that pursuit, accomodations must be made to fill the children’s needs in other ways.
this discussion according to OP is limited to those in present day, not religious or secular figures of the past
I do not think that women who pursue career success are neccessarily immoral for making this choice, but I can see tempations to do things that make that success easier to achieve. B****irth control certainly comes to mind. I don’t know that women are more inclined in this than men though. I think it takes a special marriage to tolorate this. Either the man must be willing to give to the wife’s career or they must both be willing to give on family to jointly pursue careers.
Again, I want to say I don’t think this is immoral. I know the OP didn’t want past examples, but if we look at any examples (past or present) you will find the women had tremendous sources of help to make their pursuits possible. (Nannies, extended family, understanding husbands, even political/religious encouragement in some cases.) For those few select women, there was a unique situation that allowed their families to be provided for even if mom or both parents were absent much of the time.