Women Priests?!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wintersdemise
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

Wintersdemise

Guest
I came across a YouTube video of a female Bishop in California ordaining women Priests. How did this happen? They have there own website too. According to them they were ordained by Bishops in the first place. Were these Bishops punished? Also, it seems they’re against Priestly celibacy. What has the Vatican done against these heresies?

romancatholicwomenpriests.org/
 
I came across a YouTube video of a female Bishop in California ordaining women Priests. How did this happen? They have there own website too. According to them they were ordained by Bishops in the first place. Were these Bishops punished? Also, it seems they’re against Priestly celibacy. What has the Vatican done against these heresies?

romancatholicwomenpriests.org/
These bishops doing this are not Catholic Bishops, they are usually of the schismatic Old Catholic group that broke away from the Catholic Church following Vatican I.
 
Besides, even if a Bishop ‘ordained’ them, as women they aren’t validly ordained. Valid matter. . .well, matters.

If a priest went up and thoroughly intended to consecrate beer and pizza as the Eucharist, he could ‘say the words’, totally mean the words, etc. . .but the beer and pizza would not become the Eucharist. . .ever.
 
I came across a YouTube video of a female Bishop in California ordaining women Priests. How did this happen? They have there own website too. According to them they were ordained by Bishops in the first place. Were these Bishops punished? Also, it seems they’re against Priestly celibacy. What has the Vatican done against these heresies?

romancatholicwomenpriests.org/
They are stocking up on dry wood, gasoline and matches!😃

The main weapons that the Vatican uses are education of the masses and prayer. It will take time but I think that some of those poor souls will repent.
 
Were these people Catholics?
Isn’t the head of the Episcopal church in the US a woman from California? Could what saw the woman bishop of that group performing a ceremony with other women?
 
Were these people Catholics?
Isn’t the head of the Episcopal church in the US a woman from California? Could what saw the woman bishop of that group performing a ceremony with other women?
These women are identified as Catholics in name only. They have been excommunicated from the Church. They are not Episcopal. Their website is called “Roman Catholic Womenpriests.”
 
I don’t believe that women can be or should be ordained as priests in the Roman Catholic Church. Nevertheless, I think the Church should ask, humbly and reverently, as a means of self examination, what is it about our Church community that makes these women feel their gifts and talents have no place within the present structure of the Church? Why do they feel an ordained life as a priest is the only means they may influence and be of service to the Church? Have women been treated as second class citizens of our Church? I suppose there are a million questions like this to ask, and of course some of the answers received may be disagreeable to me, but I think it is important not to laugh at or belittle the impulse that has made these women take the difficult steps that they have. I think it is better to seek understanding of their motivation, even if the Church finds it impossible to respond to their desire for service in a way they could accept. I can’t imagine that selfishness, evil, a desire for power or equality of the sexes or what have you, is the primary factor motivating all of these women, so what is it? What is the kernal of sincere faith that compels a woman to take such an action that seems so contrary to the life of the Church?
 
What, everytime a buncha wackos plays dress-up and let’s pretend, the Pope should issue a statement? 😉
 
The Roman Catholic Womenpriests movement was formally excommunicated by the Vatican last year.
I know that the original “Danube 7” (this first batch of “ordinations” back in 2002) were formally excommunicated, but I had thought that all subsequent excommunications were latae sententiae (i.e. automatic) and needed no formal declaration.
 
I don’t believe that women can be or should be ordained as priests in the Roman Catholic Church. Nevertheless, I think the Church should ask, humbly and reverently, as a means of self examination, what is it about our Church community that makes these women feel their gifts and talents have no place within the present structure of the Church? Why do they feel an ordained life as a priest is the only means they may influence and be of service to the Church? Have women been treated as second class citizens of our Church? I suppose there are a million questions like this to ask, and of course some of the answers received may be disagreeable to me, but I think it is important not to laugh at or belittle the impulse that has made these women take the difficult steps that they have. I think it is better to seek understanding of their motivation, even if the Church finds it impossible to respond to their desire for service in a way they could accept. **I can’t imagine that selfishness, evil, a desire for power or equality of the sexes or what have you, is the primary factor motivating all of these women, so what is it? ** What is the kernal of sincere faith that compels a woman to take such an action that seems so contrary to the life of the Church?
You are already making a statement on how pure their motivation is. Can you prove it? Evil it is the primary factor motivating these women, whatever you like it or not. Disobedience to the Church is one of the primary goals of the evil one, it brings division.
 
everytime a buncha wackos plays dress-up and let’s pretend,
Remember though, to them, there is nothing wrong with what they do. Coming from the Episcopal Church, I take exception to the quoted statement. In all my years growing up, I never knew that our priests didn’t have “valid orders,” and never knew that what they were doing was considered wrong. We always acknowledged the Catholic Church as the true church, and have practiced many of the same customs that the Catholic Church uses, not to mention the great amount of respect we had for the Catholic Church. I have left the Episcopal church, not because I didn’t like it, but because of the great amount of instability with the world church, the national church, and my own parish. I came “home” to the Catholic Church, and do not regret a single moment in an effort to make such a hard decision. However, I have no contempt for the Episcopal church or its members. They are good people just trying to get by in the same world that we do. Take it easy on them. They are Christian, just like you and I. No need to engage in a pissing contest. Its attitudes like this that keep the churches divided.
 
Remember though, to them, there is nothing wrong with what they do. Coming from the Episcopal Church, I take exception to the quoted statement. In all my years growing up, I never knew that our priests didn’t have “valid orders,” and never knew that what they were doing was considered wrong. We always acknowledged the Catholic Church as the true church, and have practiced many of the same customs that the Catholic Church uses, not to mention the great amount of respect we had for the Catholic Church. I have left the Episcopal church, not because I didn’t like it, but because of the great amount of instability with the world church, the national church, and my own parish. I came “home” to the Catholic Church, and do not regret a single moment in an effort to make such a hard decision. However, I have no contempt for the Episcopal church or its members. They are good people just trying to get by in the same world that we do. Take it easy on them. They are Christian, just like you and I. No need to engage in a pissing contest. Its attitudes like this that keep the churches divided.
My statement was not in reference to female Episcopal Priests, but to Roman Catholic laywomen with delusions of … well… validity. The difference is that the Catholics should know better. Like you, I have no contempt for the faithful in Anglicanism (it’d be hard to, considering almost my entire family is still Episcopalian!)

Also, welcome home from another ex-Piskie! 👍
 
You are already making a statement on how pure their motivation is. Can you prove it? Evil it is the primary factor motivating these women, whatever you like it or not. Disobedience to the Church is one of the primary goals of the evil one, it brings division.
I think we need to keep in mind here that evil is often enough a misprioritization of goods. Thus the women may believe what they are doing is good, but they are willfully rejecting the teaching of the Church and thus causing schism.

Thus regardless of the theological discussion regarding whether women should be allowed to be priests, these women are violating a basic precept of Catholic morality which is the ends do not justify the means. I.e., even if we all agreed that women should be made priests (A position I feel unqualified to comment on and happily defer to my bishop and the Pope on :)), these women are knowingly committing evil by dividing the church and creating scandle.

–
Bill
 
You are already making a statement on how pure their motivation is. Can you prove it? Evil it is the primary factor motivating these women, whatever you like it or not. Disobedience to the Church is one of the primary goals of the evil one, it brings division.
Yeh, you’re right to a point. I’m not saying that evil or selfishness is not involved. Perhaps it is. I don’t really know. It’s just difficult for me to imagine that everyone within that movement or every woman who thinks she has a call to the priesthood is acting purely from those motives. I simply want to know what those other motives might be and is there a way the Church can meet the needs of these people on some level. I agree that disobedience and division is a primary goal of the evil one, but it seems to me the Church still must be concerned for those women who, though misguided or misled, are still seeking to touch God.
 
What, everytime a buncha wackos plays dress-up and let’s pretend, the Pope should issue a statement? 😉
No, I think the theological issues are fairly well resolved. Another statement isn’t necessary. Still, some kind of pastoral response could go a long way to restoring communication between these women and the Church. At the very least, I’m sure ridicule isn’t the answer to the problem.
 
No, I think the theological issues are fairly well resolved. Another statement isn’t necessary. Still, some kind of pastoral response could go a long way to restoring communication between these women and the Church.
I’m fairly certain the Bishops involved where these little dramas happen have made the appropriate pastoral responses (which would be out of the public eye, so you and I wouldn’t be privy). I know I’ve seen numerous public statements from various Bishops condemning these faux-ordinations, which usually means that the private correspondence was ignored and now the Bishop must go public to protect the faithful.
At the very least, I’m sure ridicule isn’t the answer to the problem.
Well, when you do something ridiculous, you invite ridicule. 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top