Women Speaking In the Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter Image_of_God
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I

Image_of_God

Guest
I am worried about the Scripture verse that says that women are not aloud to speak in the Church. I don’t know how to react to that. This is not an attempt to put any women down, but how do we react to St. Paul’s statement without offending the ladies?😦
 
As a woman, I’d say the key is context.

From what I have read, in the time and in the areas where St. Paul was addressing his letters, there had been ‘recent’ movements (particularly among the “Greek” populations) where women had been attempting to ‘take over’ the ceremonies, and not for good. St. Paul is warning the believers, not that women per se are not ‘fit to speak’, but that in the circumstances going on which seem to happen in cycles (ever notice there is no new heresy, no real new sin, but only new ‘names’???😃 ) believers are to be on guard against letting things not for God, but actively against God, be ‘preached’ in the church. Over and over, sometimes by men as ‘leaders’, other times by women, most often the majority of the faithful ‘followers’, these cycles come back and the people’s ‘itching ears’ hear the newest ‘spin’ on the same old sins. . .

Pride did Eve in once, and it is still IMO the chief vice that women fall victim to today. Adam, OTOH, allowed sloth (that laissez-faire attitude–hey, she’s got the apple, it must be okay, sure looks tasty) to conquer him and again, IMO that is the chief vice that men fall victim to.

I’m not offended by St. Paul, far from it. Women and men are different. There is a time, and a place, and an individual ‘role’ that God gives every one of us. St. Paul addresses this further when he speaks of every part of the body being ‘part’ of the body, and that “if I am a hand and not a foot, I do not thereby say that I am not of the body.”
 
As a woman, I’d say the key is context.

From what I have read, in the time and in the areas where St. Paul was addressing his letters, there had been ‘recent’ movements (particularly among the “Greek” populations) where women had been attempting to ‘take over’ the ceremonies, and not for good. St. Paul is warning the believers, not that women per se are not ‘fit to speak’, but that in the circumstances going on which seem to happen in cycles (ever notice there is no new heresy, no real new sin, but only new ‘names’???😃 ) believers are to be on guard against letting things not for God, but actively against God, be ‘preached’ in the church. Over and over, sometimes by men as ‘leaders’, other times by women, most often the majority of the faithful ‘followers’, these cycles come back and the people’s ‘itching ears’ hear the newest ‘spin’ on the same old sins. . .

Pride did Eve in once, and it is still IMO the chief vice that women fall victim to today. Adam, OTOH, allowed sloth (that laissez-faire attitude–hey, she’s got the apple, it must be okay, sure looks tasty) to conquer him and again, IMO that is the chief vice that men fall victim to.

I’m not offended by St. Paul, far from it. Women and men are different. There is a time, and a place, and an individual ‘role’ that God gives every one of us. St. Paul addresses this further when he speaks of every part of the body being ‘part’ of the body, and that “if I am a hand and not a foot, I do not thereby say that I am not of the body.”
Thanks for your insight, it was very informational.🙂
 
I am worried about the Scripture verse that says that women are not aloud to speak in the Church. I don’t know how to react to that. This is not an attempt to put any women down, but how do we react to St. Paul’s statement without offending the ladies?😦
I just say no whenever I am asked to read. Can’t believe they are still askin’ after all those no’s.
 
I just say no whenever I am asked to read. Can’t believe they are still askin’ after all those no’s.
You should just tell them you don’t believe in the feminization of the altar. That should keep them occupied enough that they won’t ask for at least awhile if ever (or at least until they find out what you mean).:rotfl:
 
You should just tell them you don’t believe in the feminization of the altar. That should keep them occupied enough that they won’t ask for at least awhile if ever (or at least until they find out what you mean).:rotfl:
Already done that. Told a former nun who married a former priest. (I think they eloped from the orders together). She doesn’t talk to me anymore.
 
Already done that. Told a former nun who married a former priest. (I think they eloped from the orders together). She doesn’t talk to me anymore.
Well then, it’s surprising that they ask you at all anymore. This one always works for me. 👍
 
Well first off I would like to say hi. I’m new here.

Whenever someone asks me about this or when I present it to others, I tell them that God has given men and women different roles in life as well as in his church. Also tell them that these roles in no way makes there participation anyless important. I’m sorry my advice is not very informative. Its late
 
I am worried about the Scripture verse that says that women are not aloud to speak in the Church. I don’t know how to react to that. This is not an attempt to put any women down, but how do we react to St. Paul’s statement without offending the ladies?😦
If yur not wearin a headcovering what’s to worry about?
 
the sanctuary is the Holy of Holies. no lay-people men or women may enter during mass unless they are serving.

introibo ad altare Dei:
ad Deum qui leatificat, juventutam meam
 
Tantum’s post is very good. At the risk of not adding but detracting, I’d like to try to add to her comment.

The Scripture mentioned in the original post is about teaching without authority. It is not about reading. It is imperative that we don’t impute to the Word meaning and context not intended.

Reading the first and second readings is simply an **annunciation **of the Word of God. The Word is the teacher.

Giving the Homily is teaching which is restricted to Bishops and his ordained “assigns” which is restricted to Priests and Deacons who are the only ordained. At the time of the very early church, ordination was much less defined than it is today and was even after just a few decades of the early Church.
 
My wife and I are concerned that so many roles in the Catholic Church are filled with women and at least half should really be filled by capable men. As large as the Church is we feel that it is embarrassing and shameful that men are either unwilling to step up to the plate or maybe some of the women are hanging on or competing so hard for those roles that capable men are illiminated from the equation. Maybe the pay just won’t support a family. I don’t know but there are many preachers that survive on less. Personally, I struggle with women in roles other than as teachers for children or specialized areas. I’m still at seeing girls as alter “persons”. I was an alter boy in the 70’s, left the church in the late 80’s and was surprized to see girls on the alter as servers. I have to ignore it. I’m not in authority, but I still feel uncomfortable with receiving communion from a woman after “serving on the table” every Sunday in a non-Catholic church.

Sure you can beat me up if you wish, but I guarantee you do not know where I’m coming from unless you grew up in a male dominated “Christian only” church. My wife might volunteer one day, but I don’t think she’s comfortable with that role for women yet. She usually passes on circle prayers because she was taught that women shouldn’t lead prayer ever when Christian men are present. It’s a scriptuel only (cultural) thing associated with her faith of birth. Now that she’s Catholic, we’ll just see where the Holy Spirit draws her. Probably the oratory.
 
My wife and I are concerned that so many roles in the Catholic Church are filled with women and at least half should really be filled by capable men. As large as the Church is we feel that it is embarrassing and shameful that men are either unwilling to step up to the plate or maybe some of the women are hanging on or competing so hard for those roles that capable men are illiminated from the equation. Maybe the pay just won’t support a family. I don’t know but there are many preachers that survive on less. Personally, I struggle with women in roles other than as teachers for children or specialized areas. I’m still at seeing girls as alter “persons”. I was an alter boy in the 70’s, left the church in the late 80’s and was surprized to see girls on the alter as servers. I have to ignore it. I’m not in authority, but I still feel uncomfortable with receiving communion from a woman after “serving on the table” every Sunday in a non-Catholic church.

Sure you can beat me up if you wish, but I guarantee you do not know where I’m coming from unless you grew up in a male dominated “Christian only” church. My wife might volunteer one day, but I don’t think she’s comfortable with that role for women yet. She usually passes on circle prayers because she was taught that women shouldn’t lead prayer ever when Christian men are present. It’s a scriptuel only (cultural) thing associated with her faith of birth. Now that she’s Catholic, we’ll just see where the Holy Spirit draws her. Probably the oratory.
I’m uncomfortable too, with all the roles that women have in the Church today, and this often places me at odds on these forums with other people who have no problem with it. I personally always receive Communion from the priest, and in my parish, only the priest gives out the hosts, so that isn’t a problem. I get overwhelmed at all the women in the sanctuary, and that is one reason I drive so far to attend the TLM once a month. It’s an oasis of peace, to be sure.
 
ok…wow… I just read through this thread and I’m confused now. Is it not right for women to read the First and Second reading during Mass? What about the Responsorial Psalm, especially if it’s sung by a female cantor? I know these sound stupid but I grew up with my mother being the consumate Catholic doing the readings, being an EME, having my brother and I as alter servers… than again, she’s pro-choice and so I’m seriously STILL learning what is truly right in the Church… not “what’s the right with the Church according to mom’s views”.
 
I sorry about your mothers choices thinking the terminating children in the womb is a choice. As a former Protestant, we rejected that even. But as far as women being cantors and alter servers and lecturns (reading) the official Church position on that is acceptable. I’'m merely saying that in our former church - the "c"hurch of Christ women followed the scriptural rendering where it tells women to be silent in the worship. Now I’m not going to go into why the Catholic Church accepts this now and even threw out the mantilla (like most or all non-Catholic Christian faiths).

If you have a question, read the Catachism. If your confused, PLEASE enroll in RCIA - Right of Christian Initiation for Adults. Most converts that enter the Catholic Church know more than over 90% of the cradle Catholics. Unfortuneatly your mother seems to fall in that 90% range. I would encourage you to print off some of the pictures of unborn children on the web and give them to your mother. To deny abortions kills children with that would indicate how far gone morally someone is approaching. I’m not nice on this topic, so please forgive my bluntness. Just join the RCIA group so you can learn the truth about what the Catholic Church teaches. Many cradle Catholics are too embarrassed and/or proud to admit that they don’t really know the true teachings of the Church.

I am talking here about feeling uncomfortable with women engaged as deeply as they are without men being on the forefront of the battlefield - the spiritual battlefield leading their families through this life as an example for their families and others. This is a society problem that apparently has infultrated the Church at all levels. In my book, this approaches heresy. Strong words. But you have to know my entire story with SSPX dad of the extreem type and an anti-Catholic mother - not to mention all the lame cafateria Catholics that think they can pick and choose what they want. To reject anything that the Catholic Church requires you to believe is heresy and you are in danger of loosing your soul if you do it knowingly. And if you don’t try to learn, you are guilty of of neglecting your faith formation.

Now I realize that this sounds judgemental, but I’m not making this stuff up. Fr. Corapi teaches this stuff as do other priests. What irritates me is that many if not most priest don’t stand up for the faith/truth and courageously speak about this stuff. I think that they get tired of being attacked by pathetic Catholics. My answer is CUT THEM OFF like they did in the early Church and withhold the sacraments from them until they repent. BTW that’s the Protestant way. These lame Catholics are dragging the ship down with them and many of them are convicted of taking everyone with them as if there is safety in numbers. That is so far wrong. To me that is also heresy and they will probably be held accountable for that one day. I pray for the bishops, priests and deacons all the time as I do the faith formation ministers that teach us. I hope to be a deacon one day, but God is still working with me. I spent a year in the seminary and came close to becoming a church of Christ preacher & military Chaplain. But God obviously had a different plan for us.

My angry tone is from dealing with the people that led me away from the truth that were Catholic, not Protestant. It was the Catholics that led me down a path the was worse than the alternative, non-Catholic Christian with similar beliefs sincerely trying to “restore” the early Church. And ironically I ended up coming back home. But my believes have always been deeply rooted in Catholicism. It’s a cultural thing I guess engrained in my psyche. It may have been to draw my wife to the peace that the Catholic Church offers in exchange for the judgemental tones that you see in my thoughts-engrained in me from 17 years of trying to be a “good” Christian (church of Christ) man for her. But discovering the Early Church Fathers with a lot more education under my belt drew me back at the same time it drew her. She had to convert first so that I wouldn’t break my promise to her parents. God helped us in that. She was very anti-Catholic. And frankly your mother doesn’t understand the truth or she would never accept abortion for any reason.

I hope I’m not too offensive. I’m trying not to lose sight of the prize. If it helps my 12 year old (desiring to become a Franciscan Friar/priest) gave me a cup that says that God is still working on me. I need all the help I can get. So pray that God leads me to where he wants me and that I have enough sense to follow this time.

I will keep her and you in my prayers as I do all Catholics that are deeply lost in confusion.

Pax tecum
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top