There is no catholic anwer, but you can ask the opinion of others Catholics.
Would you see a male Gynaecologist if the wait time was shorter
If it is for this only reason, no.
what is your opinion of males being Gynaecologists altogether please?
No real opinion, except the patient must have the choice if it possible. Some may be more confortable with someone of the opposite sex (because it brings more distance with the doctor), others with someone of the same sex for modesty reasons.
As for me and my experience, I banned them.
Choosing a female health provider is not something that is uncommom or stupid. Some health providers recommand this for some women.
I’m sure that many are respectable genuine people but I can’t help feeling that some of them are potentially pervs who chose the field for ulterior reasons and news articles like the below don’t do much to convince me otherwise.
It happens, but certainely is an exception.
Some websites/ feminist associations score or share comments of patients, if a physician is often ambigious, then avoid him.
What is more likely is a gynecologist who does not respect enough his patient, does not ask explicit consent for everything he wants to do (
they always should), does not provide enough information, or doesn’t take enough time or care.
It is what have been enlight recently in many places in the world, following an awarness thanks to
me too &cie. Theses “gynecological violences” can happened regardless of the gender.
There are many settings to consider in a choice of a physician:
- skills, the more important
- the consideration of the patient
- accessibility
- And some catholics would prefer physicians who are the most in line with their life values.
Haves’s discussion!
The choice exists only for priviledge people , as in many places, the lack of doctors is a reality.