Working For Gynecologist

  • Thread starter Thread starter dal11
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

dal11

Guest
My wife who is not Catholic does typing at home for doctor’s offices. One of them is a gynecologist who prescribes birth control including the pill. Since contreception is wrong especially the pill which may abort a child, should I persuade her to give up this particular typing job. To me since the doctors know how the pill works, all gynecologist that hands these things out are abortion clinics. I know this is going to start a fight, but I don’t like her working for them. She already lets me raise the kids Catholic and practice all the church teaches (if you know what I mean).
 
If she were a nurse and was dispensing or otherwise directly involved with contraception then I would say this is a valid moral issue to bring up with her.

However, as merely a typist for a doctor at most she is remotely cooperating and is not sinning, IMHO.

I personally do not think this is a big enough issue to start a big controversy within the marriage. If she could find a position with another doctor easily, then maybe, but I wouldn’t really lose sleep over this.
 
40.png
dal11:
My wife who is not Catholic does typing at home for doctor’s offices. One of them is a gynecologist who prescribes birth control including the pill. Since contreception is wrong especially the pill which may abort a child, should I persuade her to give up this particular typing job. To me since the doctors know how the pill works, all gynecologist that hands these things out are abortion clinics. I know this is going to start a fight, but I don’t like her working for them. She already lets me raise the kids Catholic and practice all the church teaches (if you know what I mean).
All she is doing is typing. She’s not dispensing anything. How does SHE feel about it??
~ Kathy ~
 
I have been a medical transcriber / medical records editor for the past 20 years. In the course of that time, I have transcribed tens of thousands of medical records, including surgical accounts of abortions.

I asked myself the same question. Am I violating my morals or being unfaithful to my conviction that abortion is abominable? For me, the answer was “no”.

Merely recording an event does not make one a party to it, directly or indirectly. Those who recorded Christians being fed to the lions were not complicit in that event by simply relating what they saw. I believe the same is true here. Your wife is making a recording of a medical office visit or procedure. Whether she records this or not does not affect the ultimate outcome. Nor does she profit from it. Meaning, she will be paid regardless of the purpose of the visit to the gynecologist.

I agree with the former poster. Ease up. She is not a participant by comission or omission, however distasteful the event taking place.
 
I am a computer programmer at a world famous secular hospital. I work on the hospital’s Electronic Patient Record system. The major feature of this system is the documentation of patient encounters: operative notes, discharge summaries, clinic notes, etc.

As you can imagine, there are all sorts of things in these notes that go against the teachings of the Catholic Church, including abortions, illicit fertility treatments, contraception, etc., etc., etc.

Still, there is no moral dilemma because the fact of a patient’s abortion is a fact. The abortion did not occur because it is documented in the system. The birth control wasn’t prescribed or used because it was documented in the system.

And the fact that a person is on birth control is a relevant medical fact that physicians who treat the patient need to know so that they don’t do something else to harm them.

No, there is absolutely no cooperation in evil going on here, simply by documenting what has already occurred.

From a moral perspective, it is no different than an epidemiologist studying a potential link between abortion and breast cancer. The facts are the facts. Documenting them is actually a testimony to the Truth, and is therefore a morally positive thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top