B
benedictgal
Guest
If you were to re-read my posts, I never said anything about scrapping the movement. What I have called into question is what LifeTeen has been doing to the Mass, inclusive of the music. The Fathers of the 2005 Synod on the Eucharist, a good majority of whom were bishops (including some from the United States) found the music used at Youth Masses to be problematic. That is something that you do not seem to recognize.With all due respect, not every comment that disagrees with yours is a strawman argument. My question is valid because he said “if people think it needs to be changed” which back then people DID think we needed to switch away from Latin, yet many say that was a good thing.
Once again, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops gave Life Teen a list of items that needed to be changed; they got changed. I know this because I was there at the time. Life Teen acted in accordance to Bishops, who likely reported their findings to the Vatican. Once again, if there was a huge issue about it they would have scrapped it totally.
Rather than just go by what the LifeTeen manual says, why try and introduce Traditional elements of sacred music into the Mass? You may find that the youth will be receptive of this because it is not the same-old same-old that they listen to on their i-pods and on the radio. Sacred music goes beyond themselves and delves into a deeper level. You do the kids no favors by not exposing them to the rich treasury of the Church’s sacred music.
Having an Apostolic Constitution approved is one thing; how the movement treats the Mass is quite another, something that you continue to not see, as I read your posts.