Worship God every day

  • Thread starter Thread starter Isaiah45_9
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am a convert to Catholicism from Evangelical Protestantism.



So I think that as Evangelical Protestants move outside the church doors (with fear and trembling!), it’s a great opportunity for Catholics to get to know them, and for them to get to know real Catholics.
Very interesting observations Cat, thanks for sharing!

Interestingly enough, my family, as a whole, has found it a lot easier to meet new people and socialize outside the Church as we started attending the Catholic Church. I am a revert and my family is convert. What a great blessing Christ has given me!
 
Here is something I don’t understand.

I have never seen a Protestant (Lutheran, Reformed, Methodist, Baptist, Anglican, Episcopalian, Non-Denom, Pentecostal, or other denomination - forgive the general tone) Church offer worship services every day of the week.

Why is that?

Wouldn’t it make sense to make available for the believers the ability to gather together and praise and worship God in unity, every day of the week?

Some people work on Sundays, it would make the community grow stronger together, I mean the benefits are pretty amazing.

Is it because of the individuality that is preached (You know the personal relationship thing)?, the community is not strong enough?, there is not enough Pastors?

Is the division so grave that it fractures the communion?

Lack of commitment from the laity?

Would really like to hear your opinion.
Jesus said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.”

I can’t imagine why services every day of the week wouldn’t be a foremost thought. I can understand why at times it may not be practical, “somewhat”.
 
Jesus said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.”

I can’t imagine why services every day of the week wouldn’t be a foremost thought. I can understand why at times it may not be practical, “somewhat”.
If you have been reading my posts, you will see that I made it clear that Evangelical Protestant churches offer multiple opportunities during the week to worship/pray/hear the Word of God/praise/sing/study/work/give.

Evangelical Protestants would answer your query by saying, “There is no reason to have a formal “worship service” when all these other opportunities exist.”

Also, if you have read my posts, you will see that I tried to explain that many Evangelical Protestants consider all of life an act of worship to God. Yes, the worship service is the way to honor the Lord’s Day (Sunday), but it is not “necessary” to worship God.

Catholics teach that the Mass is the highest form of worship here on this earth (and above), but Protestants would never make the claim that their worship service is any higher form of worship than any other worship time, or for that matter, than the daily worship that occurs when a young mother nurses her child or a teenager studies schoolwork or a father works hard to support his family.

Evangelical Protestantism is a different mindset than Catholicism. Catholics have Mass every day because it is our opportunity to receive Christ in the Word and in the Eucharist. But Evangelical Protestants receive Jesus ONCE for all time, when they invite Him into their heart to be their personal Savior. This doesn’t necessarily happen in the “worship service,” but may happen any time that a person prays and asks Jesus to come into their heart. And it only happens ONCE, and from then on, Jesus never leaves their heart.

I hope this clarifies. And please keep in mind that I’m speaking for Evangelical Protestants, not mainlines.
 
Protestants would never make the claim that their worship service is any higher form of worship than any other worship time, or for that matter, than the daily worship that occurs when a young mother nurses her child or a teenager studies schoolwork or a father works hard to support his family.

Evangelical Protestantism is a different mindset than Catholicism. Catholics have Mass every day because it is our opportunity to receive Christ in the Word and in the Eucharist. But Evangelical Protestants receive Jesus ONCE for all time, when they invite Him into their heart to be their personal Savior. This doesn’t necessarily happen in the “worship service,” but may happen any time that a person prays and asks Jesus to come into their heart. And it only happens ONCE, and from then on, Jesus never leaves their heart.

I hope this clarifies. And please keep in mind that I’m speaking for Evangelical Protestants, not mainlines.
Cat, when EP’s say that Jesus comes into their hearts for all time, what do they say about when Jesus said clearly that if one doesn’t eat the flesh and drink the blood of the Son of Man, they have no life in them.

How do they reconcile this without taking Jesus’ flesh and blood, as in Catholic churches and in this case daily (of course this also means one must discern first before taking)?.

MJ
 
On whose authority do you dare to declare the Church Fathers to be heretics?
For the sake of clairty, my post was number 17.
In my post, I never declared the Church Fathers to be heretics.

I did say this in post number 17:
The Early Church fathers had some very good ideas, but most if not all of them would not pass the test of being heresy free today.
If you think I will reject the Catholic Church in union with Rome because you feel I will find something in the works of the creed of St Athanasius to lead me to reject her, you would be very wrong in doing so

Bolding is mine.
 
Cat, when EP’s say that Jesus comes into their hearts for all time, what do they say about when Jesus said clearly that if one doesn’t eat the flesh and drink the blood of the Son of Man, they have no life in them.

How do they reconcile this without taking Jesus’ flesh and blood, as in Catholic churches and in this case daily (of course this also means one must discern first before taking)?.

MJ
They say that this is symbolic language, much like when Jesus said, “We are the lights of the world.” We aren’t literally lights, glowing and putting out a real “light” from our bodies. It is a symbolic phrase meaning that we are supposed to live our lives in such a way that others can see Jesus in us and want Him.

Same with “eating the Flesh and drinking the Blood of Christ.” They see this as symbolic language, that we don’t literally “eat Jesus,” but instead, we are hungry for His Word and being with Him in prayer. We say this all time–“I’m just so hungry for some good music,” or “I’m starving for a vacation!”

You have to admit, there’s logic in this interpretation.

What my daughter pointed out (she was in high school at the time) is that in all the other places where Jesus said, “I am the Door,” or “I am the Light of the World,” He said, “I am that object.” But at the Last Supper, Jesus took up the bread and wine and said, “This Bread is ME, this Wine is Me.”

It’s a huge difference in phrasing. He wasn’t saying, “I am the Bread, I am the Wine,” but “This Bread is Me, this Wine is Me.”

At any rate, the answer to your questions is that Evangelical Protestants believe the language is symbolic.

And there are plenty of verses to justify the belief that Jesus never leaves us, so the belief that He is in our hearts forever is also logical.

I know–I sound like I’m leaning EP! I’m not–I believe that the historical, traditional, and Scriptural evidence (especially when you factor in the Old Testament) all points to the truth of Catholic teaching regarding the Eucharist.

All I’m trying to do is point out to Catholics that it’s not easy to knock an Evangelical Protestant off their apologetic wall. A lot of Catholics try, and a lot of Catholics end up leaving the Church to become Evangelical Protestants! I’ve seen it over and over–at least a quarter of our EP church members/friends were former Catholics! Be careful out there!
 
Cat, when EP’s say that Jesus comes into their hearts for all time, what do they say about when Jesus said clearly that if one doesn’t eat the flesh and drink the blood of the Son of Man, they have no life in them.

How do they reconcile this without taking Jesus’ flesh and blood, as in Catholic churches and in this case daily (of course this also means one must discern first before taking)?.

MJ
As an evangelical Protestant, I can tell you would receive different answers on this depending on what tradition you come from.

Some who subscribe to a strong memorial view would say it is simply remembering Christ and what he did on the cross and from the remembering and recommitting oneself to Christ, one is spiritually renewed in the act of partaking.

Others hold a more dynamic view of the Lord’s Supper. We would believe that in the Lord’s Supper by the power of the Holy Spirit Christ is spiritually present to provide spiritual nourishment to our souls and healing to our bodies. It is both food and medicine.
 
They say that this is symbolic language, much like when Jesus said, “We are the lights of the world.” We aren’t literally lights, glowing and putting out a real “light” from our bodies. It is a symbolic phrase meaning that we are supposed to live our lives in such a way that others can see Jesus in us and want Him.

Same with “eating the Flesh and drinking the Blood of Christ.” They see this as symbolic language, that we don’t literally “eat Jesus,” but instead, we are hungry for His Word and being with Him in prayer. We say this all time–“I’m just so hungry for some good music,” or “I’m starving for a vacation!”

You have to admit, there’s logic in this interpretation.
Are you saying that EP’s believe that when many of Jesus’ OWN disciples walked away and longer followed him because they took it as literal when Jesus “logically” meant it as symbolic language? Seriously…logically? :hmmm:

It’s almost like EP’s don’t want to read the words FLESH. (Im not doubting the EP’s love for Jesus mind you).
All I’m trying to do is point out to Catholics that it’s not easy to knock an Evangelical Protestant off their apologetic wall. ** A lot of Catholics try, and a lot of Catholics end up leaving the Church to become Evangelical Protestants!** I’ve seen it over and over–at least a quarter of our EP church members/friends were former Catholics! Be careful out there!
That is probably because some Catholics aren’t really focusing on the Mass. :tsktsk:

MJ
 
As an evangelical Protestant, I can tell you would receive different answers on this depending on what tradition you come from.

Some who subscribe to a strong memorial view would say it is simply remembering Christ and what he did on the cross and from the remembering and recommitting oneself to Christ, one is spiritually renewed in the act of partaking.

Others hold a more dynamic view of the Lord’s Supper. We would believe that in the Lord’s Supper by the power of the Holy Spirit Christ is spiritually present to provide spiritual nourishment to our souls and healing to our bodies. It is both food and medicine.
Thanks for some of the clarifications of how EP’s think.

However, I feel the The word Tradition (now that you say it) does now sound like when one goes further away from early Church tradition, one comes up with different ways to “lessen” Jesus’ own words. 🤷

Please understand I don’t mean that you don’t Love Jesus. 🙂

MJ
 
I hope this clarifies
I was thinking slightly different Cat. Unfortunate, but for reasons mostly relating to crime, Churches cannot keep their doors open 24/7 anymore which they have in the past. Its unheard of that in your darkest moment the Church door might be closed. I remember when that was not so. But yes service/worship/liturgy strikes a different chord.
 
Here is something I don’t understand.

I have never seen a Protestant (Lutheran, Reformed, Methodist, Baptist, Anglican, Episcopalian, Non-Denom, Pentecostal, or other denomination - forgive the general tone) Church offer worship services every day of the week.

Why is that?

Wouldn’t it make sense to make available for the believers the ability to gather together and praise and worship God in unity, every day of the week?

Some people work on Sundays, it would make the community grow stronger together, I mean the benefits are pretty amazing.

Is it because of the individuality that is preached (You know the personal relationship thing)?, the community is not strong enough?, there is not enough Pastors?

Is the division so grave that it fractures the communion?

Lack of commitment from the laity?

Would really like to hear your opinion.
It is not unheard of for Lutheran parishes to have daily divine service. It would depend on the size of the parish, location, demographics, etc

Jon
 
Cat, when EP’s say that Jesus comes into their hearts for all time, what do they say about when Jesus said clearly that if one doesn’t eat the flesh and drink the blood of the Son of Man, they have no life in them.

How do they reconcile this without taking Jesus’ flesh and blood, as in Catholic churches and in this case daily (of course this also means one must discern first before taking)?.

MJ
My understanding-- from an old priest who taught seminarians for twenty years, and who is a Greek and Latin scholar–is that the correct translation is CHEW or GNAW on the flesh, not eat. Which makes it obvious that it is NOT just a symbol.
 
I was thinking slightly different Cat. Unfortunate, but for reasons mostly relating to crime, Churches cannot keep their doors open 24/7 anymore which they have in the past. Its unheard of that in your darkest moment the Church door might be closed. I remember when that was not so. But yes service/worship/liturgy strikes a different chord.
I agree with you about the practical reasons why many churches have to keep their doors shut and locked. It’s a dangerous world out there.

But let me tell you all a little secret about Evangelical Protestant churches…

…In the United States, Evangelical Protestants tend to build or re-locate their churches to the affluent, therefore very safe, areas of any town or city, because that’s their main mission field–people who are wealthy, comfortable, or at least getting by. So leaving the doors open 24/7 isn’t really an issue, other than with insurance companies who no doubt penalize heavily for churches who leave their doors unlocked!

Sssh! I know it’s a generalization and there are exceptions, but in the 47 years that I spent with Evangelical Protestant churches, I don’t know of a single one that voluntarily remained in the “tough” section of any town or city. They always buy land in a growing, affluent area, and then raise the funds and build!

It’s not that the Evangelical Protestants don’t love the poor. Oh, heavens, Evangelical Protestants give huge amounts of money and time to helping the poor! Do NOT accuse them of abandoning the poor, because you would be wrong.

But they don’t build their churches in the poor or “dangerous” sections of town. They prefer to send their buses or vans around to pick up the poor and bring them to their suburban church in the “good section” of town.

There is some merit in this, so don’t be too quick to criticize. By exposing the poor to a better lifestyle, the poor can learn how to take steps to achieve this lifestyle. They can make friends with wealthier people and often end up getting jobs or at least job leads. They can learn skills that help them to get out of poverty. They can often get involved with classes in ESL or money management or nutrition or child-care that help them to make better use of the money that they have. And of course, if they qualify, they can get financial aid very quickly–a wealthy church has money to give.

But it means that many Evangelical Protestants never do any hands-on work with the poor, unless you count “writing a check” as hands-on.

Interestingly, in many cities, it is the “despised” Mainline Protestant churches that remain in the inner city and do a lot of hands-on work with the poor. I say “despised,” because many Evangelical Protestants consider the Mainlines churches “theologically and politically liberal beyond redemption.” Well, it seems to me that the Lord is just as interested in what we DO as what we BELIEVE and CONFESS. Right?! 🙂
 
It is not unheard of for Lutheran parishes to have daily divine service. It would depend on the size of the parish, location, demographics, etc

Jon
Thanks Jon. I noticed in my area that the LCMS parishes are mostly small. The biggest ones are the those that include a school, mostly elementary. Do you know if the school children attend Service during the week for those Parishes?
 
I was thinking slightly different Cat. Unfortunate, but for reasons mostly relating to crime, Churches cannot keep their doors open 24/7 anymore which they have in the past. Its unheard of that in your darkest moment the Church door might be closed. I remember when that was not so.
This is so true :(. I remember having access to the Church in my neighborhood 24/7.
 
Thanks Jon. I noticed in my area that the LCMS parishes are mostly small. The biggest ones are the those that include a school, mostly elementary. Do you know if the school children attend Service during the week for those Parishes?
They usually have a morning chapel service, yes.

Jon
 
I agree with you about the practical reasons why many churches have to keep their doors shut and locked. It’s a dangerous world out there.

But let me tell you all a little secret about Evangelical Protestant churches…

…In the United States, Evangelical Protestants tend to build or re-locate their churches to the affluent, therefore very safe, areas of any town or city, because that’s their main mission field–people who are wealthy, comfortable, or at least getting by. So leaving the doors open 24/7 isn’t really an issue, other than with insurance companies who no doubt penalize heavily for churches who leave their doors unlocked!

Sssh! I know it’s a generalization and there are exceptions, but in the 47 years that I spent with Evangelical Protestant churches, I don’t know of a single one that voluntarily remained in the “tough” section of any town or city. They always buy land in a growing, affluent area, and then raise the funds and build!

It’s not that the Evangelical Protestants don’t love the poor. Oh, heavens, Evangelical Protestants give huge amounts of money and time to helping the poor! Do NOT accuse them of abandoning the poor, because you would be wrong.

But they don’t build their churches in the poor or “dangerous” sections of town. They prefer to send their buses or vans around to pick up the poor and bring them to their suburban church in the “good section” of town.

There is some merit in this, so don’t be too quick to criticize. By exposing the poor to a better lifestyle, the poor can learn how to take steps to achieve this lifestyle. They can make friends with wealthier people and often end up getting jobs or at least job leads. They can learn skills that help them to get out of poverty. They can often get involved with classes in ESL or money management or nutrition or child-care that help them to make better use of the money that they have. And of course, if they qualify, they can get financial aid very quickly–a wealthy church has money to give.

But it means that many Evangelical Protestants never do any hands-on work with the poor, unless you count “writing a check” as hands-on.

Interestingly, in many cities, it is the “despised” Mainline Protestant churches that remain in the inner city and do a lot of hands-on work with the poor. I say “despised,” because many Evangelical Protestants consider the Mainlines churches “theologically and politically liberal beyond redemption.” Well, it seems to me that the Lord is just as interested in what we DO as what we BELIEVE and CONFESS. Right?! 🙂
I think you have a habit of mixing Evangelic in general with mega church. As they grow in size it is the suburbs where they can afford enough land for their large campuses. In the City of Los Angeles beside Bishop Noel Jones City of Refugee which lefty a large location in Southcentral LA for a huge location in a southern suburb or Bishop McClendon’s Full Gospel Baptist Full Harvest which started out renting a concert venue in Hollywwod on Sundays most of your megachurches are in and stayed in the city after their growth. Real estate being relative depressed because of the Crip versus Blood and 18th Street versus MS-13 gang wars in the city made it possible.

Just using the TV ministries Presiding Bishop Blakes’ West Angeles COGIC on Crenshaw, the heart of the Black community. The Price’s Crenshaw Christian Center near the touch off point of the Rodney King riots in what was the Pepperdine college campus before they moved the school to scenic Malibu. To Bishop Ulmer’s Faithful Central Bible Church on the other side of the city limits line in Southcentral to “suburban”:eek: Inglewood. To the Dream Center/Angeles Temple just outside of LA’s downtown in Echo Park.

And along every street you will see storefronts for those who are not comfortable in the mega setting.Now the people in storefronts to to band together outside of denomination distinctions so the 72nd ST. COGIC, the 71st ST AOG and the 70th ST Full Gospel Baptist will each take a day to provide community service and members freely go to each others church to provide the clothing or food kitchen. The mainline churches tend to be a bit larger in floor space and more widely separated and they are more likely to have full time clergy
 
I think you have a habit of mixing Evangelic in general with mega church. As they grow in size it is the suburbs where they can afford enough land for their large campuses. In the City of Los Angeles beside Bishop Noel Jones City of Refugee which lefty a large location in Southcentral LA for a huge location in a southern suburb or Bishop McClendon’s Full Gospel Baptist Full Harvest which started out renting a concert venue in Hollywwod on Sundays most of your megachurches are in and stayed in the city after their growth. Real estate being relative depressed because of the Crip versus Blood and 18th Street versus MS-13 gang wars in the city made it possible.

Just using the TV ministries Presiding Bishop Blakes’ West Angeles COGIC on Crenshaw, the heart of the Black community. The Price’s Crenshaw Christian Center near the touch off point of the Rodney King riots in what was the Pepperdine college campus before they moved the school to scenic Malibu. To Bishop Ulmer’s Faithful Central Bible Church on the other side of the city limits line in Southcentral to “suburban”:eek: Inglewood. To the Dream Center/Angeles Temple just outside of LA’s downtown in Echo Park.

And along every street you will see storefronts for those who are not comfortable in the mega setting.Now the people in storefronts to to band together outside of denomination distinctions so the 72nd ST. COGIC, the 71st ST AOG and the 70th ST Full Gospel Baptist will each take a day to provide community service and members freely go to each others church to provide the clothing or food kitchen. The mainline churches tend to be a bit larger in floor space and more widely separated and they are more likely to have full time clergy
I agree that most of the “black” churches, which I would agree are mainly evangelical/pentecostal, remain in the location where they first started up, even if those neighborhoods become dangerous (often due to gang activity). In our city, the black churches are the fortresses of good and decency in those neighborhoods, and the pastors and leaders of these churches maintain many excellent programs for their neighborhoods.

But I don’t know of a single “white” church that has remained in the inner city, and even in the older sections of our city. They all buy land in the newest, growing sections of the city and re-build.

And even some of the “black” churches are doing this now–moving out of the city to the “nice” neighborhoods, although I don’t know of any “black” churches that have actually built a new building. What they seem to prefer is purchasing the beautiful church buildings that used to house mainline denominations.

As for mixing “Evangelical” with “megachurch,” many of the Evangelical churches in our city have become “mini-megachurches” in their style and programming, and tend to have large numbers (in the 1000s) attending throughout the week. But yes, I agree with you that there are still plenty of the little family Evangelical Protestant churches, usually with under 200 regular attendees. These little churches are awesome. Everyone knows everyone, and they maintain a constant ministry of the Gospel of Christ (Protestant) in their neighborhoods. Also, the people tend to be generous in their offerings, because they are all working together to pay their pastor, secretary, and janitor, and to support the various church programs (children’s clubs, choir, Sunday school, etc.).

However, it is a fact that these little churches are in danger of closing whenever a megachurch moves to a city. When the attendance roster is only 200 or less, even the loss of a few families makes a big dent in the finances, and often, since people in the little churches tend to be close friends or even relatives, when one family leaves to attend the cool new megachurch, several families leave. Usually the first to be cut is the secretary, and the pastor or his wife start doing the work that the secretary was doing. This takes the pastor and wife away from their church ministries and makes the people unhappy, and so more people leave. And then the janitor is cut, and the pastor and his family start doing the cleaning work, which leaves this with even less energy to do various church ministries, and MORE people leave–and pretty soon, there isn’t enough money in the offerings to pay the pastor AND pay the expenses of the church building. Sometimes the pastor continues the church as a home church, but usually…it’s over.

I’ve read about this happening in megachurch towns and seen it in our city, and I think it’s sad. I wish that when the megachurches start up, they would only accept people into their roster of attendees who don’t attend any other church. But that’s unrealistic.

On the other hand, if the little church can just hold on, usually megachurch attendees only attend for a few years, and then they want something “deeper,” and often will return to their original church.

As to what this has to do with the topic–megachurches DO have daily worship services! Sunday is for “seekers”, and the services for members and regulars occur throughout the week.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top