M
mcq72
Guest
I like to say man is very gifted in ability to make "observations’’, but it is the deductions from them that need “anointing”.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
M
mcq72
Guest
If it’s not true how useful can it be ?Is it true? Who cares, at least it’s useful.
N
nafatyuk
Guest
Is it useful to, for only a moment, try and view an issue of morality from a Muslim, Hindu, or whatever other religion’s point of view? Yes it is, even if their position may not be correct, it is of some utility to see how others see the world.
Now, that addresses only one instance of utility, and it could plausibly be argued that a perspective on morality is on a different plane of truth than physical reality.
In that case, I will attempt to explain my viewpoint: a great interest of mine is the field of psychology; specifically, Jung’s take on it. I find that Jung’s perspective is rather novel and insightful.
But Jung uses evolution in his discourse on the biological aspect of the development of myths. In doing so, the picture that he paints is hauntingly beautiful. What is to be made of this? Well, at the very least, the perspective is to be taken into account. The evolutionary framework is not to be simply rejected out of hand.
The question then devolves to what is to be put in place of that ingenious point of view. So far, none of the proposed replacements have (in my opinion) proven themselves superior.
Now, that addresses only one instance of utility, and it could plausibly be argued that a perspective on morality is on a different plane of truth than physical reality.
In that case, I will attempt to explain my viewpoint: a great interest of mine is the field of psychology; specifically, Jung’s take on it. I find that Jung’s perspective is rather novel and insightful.
On a personal note, exposure to Jung (and interpretations of him and his theories by Joseph Campell and Jordan Peterson) led me down the path to the person I am now (and made me get considerably more devout than I previously was).
But Jung uses evolution in his discourse on the biological aspect of the development of myths. In doing so, the picture that he paints is hauntingly beautiful. What is to be made of this? Well, at the very least, the perspective is to be taken into account. The evolutionary framework is not to be simply rejected out of hand.
The question then devolves to what is to be put in place of that ingenious point of view. So far, none of the proposed replacements have (in my opinion) proven themselves superior.
M
mcq72
Guest
Ok. I was talking of creation science, not necesarily moralityIs it useful to, for only a moment, try and view an issue of morality from a Muslim, Hindu, or whatever other religion’s point of view? Yes it is, even if their position may not be correct , it is of some utility to see how others see the world.
J
JimG
Guest
Well, there are Catholic geocentrists, so likely there would be Catholic YEC advocates as well.
M
mcq72
Guest
Lol…any flat earthers out there?Well, there are Catholic geocentrists, so likely there would be Catholic YEC advocates as well.
Last edited:
T
TMC
Guest
There used to be very active group of Catholic geocentrists on this forum. Haven’t heard from any of them in a while.
E
EndTimes
Guest
The term creationism has differing definitions…Yes, but the term creationism has come to mean more than believing in God creating the universe out if nothing.
The most important is: The Creator Created Creation
G
GKMotley
Guest
I know who to ask.
G
GKMotley
Guest
I think he might know about Him.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.