U
Uncle_Norbert
Guest
A practical conclusion, that “non-denominational” churches are Protestants protesting themselves?
Any non-Catholic Christian church after the first Protestant church is by it’s very existance protesting the first Prostestant church because the protesting of The Catholic Church was done by the first Protestant church.A practical conclusion, that “non-denominational” churches are Protestants protesting themselves?
Well, that’s common sense don’t you think?I’m sure that some will find my question to be smart-aleck, but I’m being totally serious.
For 500 or so years, mulitple “Protestant” denominations have formed. Yet, even with so many Protestant “choices” among churches, there has been in the past decade-plus, an explosion of these so-called “non-denominationals”.
So, obviously, those protesting us can’t even agree as to how they protest any more?
That’s very well put SyCarl.I think that the answer is that many of these non-denominational churches believe that the New Testament model of the church was that of independent local churches. As such, they do not affiliate with any larger organization than their own congregation. That does not necessarily mean that the teaching of non-denom A in town 1 differs from non-denom B in town 2.
Can you direct me to such “rants” ? I’d love to have them “in stock”, I saw how The Church (especially Paul) ranted against churches trying to do their own thing.
The strongest argument for unity in doctrines and teachings and matters of worship…Can you direct me to such “rants” ? I’d love to have them “in stock”![]()
HiA practical conclusion, that “non-denominational” churches are Protestants protesting themselves?
Well first of all, they left Protestantism so if they were to return to anything, it would be to Protestantism.Hi
But they don’t return to Catholicism. Why?
Thanks
As I’ve said on other threads, I think it boils down to rejection of authority. For me, part of religion is getting told some things I don’t want to hear, but need to, to “keep it between the white lines”…Well first of all, they left Protestantism so if they were to return to anything, it would be to Protestantism.
Secondly, non-denoms are church unto themselves thinking that they make their own decisions, but in reality, it’s the grooup mentality that guides their decisions (as it is with all religious groups).
Think about it, the “real” definition of a non-denomin is to “not” attend a church period.
![]()
I agree. If the congregation is going to tell the religious leader what to do, why bother having one?As I’ve said on other threads, I think it boils down to rejection of authority. For me, part of religion is getting told some things I don’t want to hear, but need to, to “keep it between the white lines”…
The thought of attending a church where the congregation hires and fires the ministry is mind-boggling.
Talk about the rejection of authority ! The congregation themselves deem themselves the authority.
If I don’t like what I’m hearing at my current P/ND church, I can just go down the street and rent a building and start another church…“Welcome to Bob’s Christian Fellowship…Hi, I’m Reverend Bob…”
"Protest"ing division by being divided?They aren’t protesting anything but rivalry and division, which they don’t mean to spread. It just happens.
Most non-denominational churches actually hold a mixture of people believing different things. You will find Calvinists and Arminians and people who mix it all up and people who don’t even know what all that means, all in the same non-Denominational church. their goal is to not split over matters not found in the Nicene Creed . This mixture is why church #1 is different than church #2 and both are labeled “Non-denominational” if the majority of people in Church #1 are Calvinist, and the majority of church #2 is Arminian… you can bet what gets taught in Sunday school and from the pulpit go with the majority. This is not intentional. The point of non-denominational is to welcome all of these ideas, holding on to only the basics of Christianity as common, rejecting the trends to split off to new denominations over stuff. This is a protestant version of Church unity.But they don’t return to Catholicism. Why?
Hence the need for a “shephard”.Syele:
Good post.
Once again, there is a reason why G-d compares us to sheep…
often we do things without much thought (sorta just following the crowd).
And for those who do think more than that, I think sometimes folks are trying to get away from things that are troublesome in the main-stream denoms (such as abortion, gay rights, and other controversial issues). They want to find a better place to worship and grow spiritually, but often don’t know where to look. So they start finding other “like-minded” individuals and, voila, a new flock forms.