C
cheeto1
Guest
Is there a right time to use violence for defense and would Jesus
do it if in that situation?
do it if in that situation?
Actually, Jesus did protect His disciples but without violence:What I’m really getting at is that Jesus was crucified
as His disciples looked on (or ran away, etc). What would
He do if it was His disciples who were crucified while He was
with them? Would He have defended them with violence?
No. Absolutely not. Jesus not only predicted his own crucifixion and accepted it but he told his disciples they should expect the same. THough they probably didn’t understand him when he said it.What I’m really getting at is that Jesus was crucified
as His disciples looked on (or ran away, etc). What would
He do if it was His disciples who were crucified while He was
with them? Would He have defended them with violence?
Matthew 26:47 As he yet spoke, behold Judas, one of the twelve, came, and with him a great multitude with swords and clubs, sent from the chief priests and the ancients of the people. 48 And he that betrayed him, gave them a sign, saying: Whomsoever I shall kiss, that is he, hold him fast. 49 And forthwith coming to Jesus, he said: Hail, Rabbi. And he kissed him. 50 And Jesus said to him: Friend, whereto art thou come? Then they came up, and laid hands on Jesus, and held him.What I’m really getting at is that Jesus was crucified
as His disciples looked on (or ran away, etc). What would
He do if it was His disciples who were crucified while He was
with them? Would He have defended them with violence?
This question bothers me. I believe because it has a presumption that things that happen to us on this world are so important…important enough to involke violence. I believe not. Jesus told us to turn the other check. In the Old Testament there was violence. Would Jesus use violence, I think not. He doesn’t need to. If he wanted whatever stopped, all he would need to do is will it.Is there a right time to use violence for defense and would Jesus
do it if in that situation?
The Catechism goes on to quote Aquinas:2262 – In the Sermon on the Mount, the Lord recalls the commandment, “You shall not kill,” and adds to it the proscription of anger, hatred, and vengeance. Going further, Christ asks his disciples to turn the other cheek, to love their enemies. He did not defend himself and told Peter to leave his sword in its sheath.
2263 – The legitimate defense of persons and societies is not an exception to the prohibition against the murder of the innocent that constitutes intentional killing. The act of self-defense can have a double effect: the preservation of one’s own life; and the killing of the aggressor. . . . The one is intended, the other is not.
2264 – Love toward oneself remains a fundamental principle of morality. Therefore it is legitimate to insist on respect for one’s own right to life. Someone who defends his life is not guilty of murder even if he is forced to deal his aggressor a lethal blow…
If a man in self-defense uses more than necessary violence, it will be unlawful: whereas if he repels force with moderation, his defense will be lawful. …Nor is it necessary for salvation that a man omit the act of moderate self-defense to avoid killing the other man, since one is bound to take more care of one’s own life than another’s.
That’s right, He would just will it, I knew that. He just hasn’tThis question bothers me. I believe because it has a presumption that things that happen to us on this world are so important…important enough to involke violence. I believe not. Jesus told us to turn the other check. In the Old Testament there was violence. Would Jesus use violence, I think not. He doesn’t need to. If he wanted whatever stopped, all he would need to do is will it.
Perhaps this will help:If not, then why
do we call the police or have an army? How far does God want
us to go in defending others from violence?
Nicene said:Jam 4:17: Whoever knows what is right to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin.
A man breaks into your house and you find him raping your mother/daughter/wife…
Fulfil the teaching above, what would you do?
Peace and God Bless
Nicene
That is pretty dangerous thinking. When anyone tries to decide what is right for someone else, we are in danger of making judgements that can only be done by God.Jesus said:
8And if your hand or your foot causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away; it is better for you to enter life maimed or lame than with two hands or two feet to be thrown into the eternal fire. 9And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and throw it away; it is better for you to enter life with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into the hell of fire. (Matthew 18:8-9)
Would it not be an act of charity to likewise maim or blind our neighbor, if necessary, to prevent him from sinning and ending up in hell?
Jesus also said:6but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened round his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea. (Matthew 18:6)
Does this not imply that even killing someone, if necessary, is better than letting him cause a little one to sin?
But isn’t there ever a time when it’s an emergency, andWe are required to admonish the sinner, not maim, injure or murder them.