A
Achilles6129
Guest
The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
The flaw is the “by your standards” part. It assumes one’s standards are the correct standards.The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
If God was evil there’d be no point in serving him; no good would come of it; existence would be pointless.The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
I would be a slave if I served an evil god, and therefore I would not provided I had the power to avoid doing so.The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
I think we would have to serve him if he is the creator of life and all that exists…But if he was evil, why would he create us?The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
If there were a God that were evil and created us, I can’t see a reason this God would give free will at all. And without free-will, we wouldn’t really have much of a choice.The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
Entertainment?But if he was evil, why would he create us?
If God is something that we cannot fathom, then is there any point in questions like this? It suggests that the answer is: Serve him, don’t serve him, it doesn’t matter because we don’t have the ability to understand what God is. I’m not convinced that humankind cannot fathom what God is, at least to the extent required to work out how to act with respect to God.He is being itself…something that we cannot fathom…
I have never understood what either of these assertions actually mean. Can anyone enlighten me?He is not the highest being, but is what it means to be! … he is love.
This flies in the face of the standard answer to “how could God have allowed this to happen?” that leads so many people to a crisis of faith.I was just listening to a CA radio podcast about natural law. Natural law comes to us from our creator and part of that is our concept of what is good and what is evil. Now, if we consider your philosophical question that the creator is evil and not the greatest possible good, then that is the moral law that would be imprinted in our hearts. In other words, we would not consider him evil.
Judaism has a tradition of questioning and even accusing G-d when it is thought that He does not live up to His own moral standards.If I truly believed that the being was God, then yes I would serve and worship regardless of my personal feelings about that being’s actions.
Otherwise I would be a person who picked and chose their God according to my feeling whether or not I liked what they did. If God is God, then you serve and worship because it is God, otherwise you have allowed yourself to be the judge of what God should or should not do and what defines God.
Aha! It’s not a flawThe flaw is the “by your standards” part. It assumes one’s standards are the correct standards.
Not at all - God isn’t Satan! I’m asking if you would serve a God who’s evil by your standards. Evidently the earth-dwellers would not:Satanists worship an evil being as a “god”. You’re asking essentially if I could worship Satan. Not on my life.
I think the number of different answers to this question show that it is a very good one, or at least a very thought provoking one.Curious question.