Would You Serve a God Who You Believed was Evil?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Achilles6129
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
It’s possible that my standards are wrong. However one can only judge by what one knows, thus if i knew that God raped my son i would not serve him. Only somebody who lived in fear of such a being would serve such a being and perhaps even attempt to justify such a God to hide their fear of the alternative.
 
The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
A truly evil God would not care about my free will; therefore, if such a god existed, would I have a choice but to serve him?
 
This flies in the face of the standard answer to “how could God have allowed this to happen?” that leads so many people to a crisis of faith.

Usually their question is countered by “God is good, he works in mysterious ways, we just can’t see the big picture, you have to trust” etc.

Meaning, God has done something they consider reprehensible, yet they are counciled by other believers to keep believing in and worshiping a God who has done what they can only understand as evil.

Of course, when it comes to philosophy, people are perfectly capable of holding beliefs that are opposed to one another, and trotting out whichever one they want to apply at any given time. Myself included, lest anyone think I am pointing fingers.

Natural law or not, people have all through history believed gods to be capable of horrendously evil acts, yet continued to believe and worship them. Others make excuses that God’s acts only appear evil to people. Indeed some people worship all the harder because they believe God is likely to do some very evil and horrendous things to them if they don’t worship.
If there is truly a moral law, then this necessarily entails a God that is essentially a pure actual expression of love.

Thus, even if some horrible thing happens in the world, it is not logically possible to reject God as immoral. However, it is possible that religion can be an imperfect and immoral representation of God, and of course one must reject an evil or corrupt religion.
 
What valid and sane impulse would I be following to judge God when God, by the nature of his being and our definition of a Supreme Being, would have the final judgment over me? :confused:
 
What valid and sane impulse would I be following to judge God when God, by the nature of his being and our definition of a Supreme Being, would have the final judgment over me? :confused:
Clearly, you would serve your definition God, because by your definition God is good regardless of whether we understand his actions or not. However you would be entirely sane to reject a being claiming to be God that commands you to sacrifice your sons and daughters to him.
 
The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
Dude, you are no Protestant. You don’t represent us and you don’t even believe with a lame trap question like that. There are only maybe three answers here that are emphatically NO! People keep answering and Achilles just keeps tweaking. Or maybe twerking, cuz it is an evil question in itself. Look at all the replies where God is capitalized in context with other gods and evil. If you are using a, an, or an (s), then it is a small “g’”, people, so please be careful. God is GOD and is being offended every time you do that which Satan is really enjoying. See what this question does? Hopefully i did not make that mistake anywhere here. Anything other than God is an imposter. A Holy God is a God of free will, an evil one forces you like in Revelation and Daniel which you have read i presume, Achilles, so why ask? To cause a ruckus and divide us. We do that to ourselves, thank you. We should prolly capitulate (i know) the whole word GOD all the time. Look at how holy He is to the Jewish faith. They hold Him in such high regard they don’t even use the v-wel “o”. About love, well search “agape love” and try to conceive it. I try. What a wonderful world this would and will be! I was being polite the first time i answered so now i will defend God, though He does not need me to defend Him. But it is our duty. Now go spend time with your loving family. My immediate one hates me, which explains me being here. But that’s what happens with miserable non believers. Merry Christmas!
 
However you would be entirely sane to reject a being claiming to be God that commands you to sacrifice your sons and daughters to him.
Would you believe it entirely sane to reject a nation that requires its sons and daughters to sacrifice themselves in war for the good of the nation?

Would you believe a nation was evil just by asking for that sacrifice?

Or could a good nation ask for such a sacrifice of sons and daughters?
 
Would you believe it entirely sane to reject a nation that requires its sons and daughters to sacrifice themselves in war for the good of the nation?

Would you believe a nation was evil just by asking for that sacrifice?

Or could a good nation ask for such a sacrifice of sons and daughters?
For the greater good, men must sometimes go to war. But i would never blindly fight for a corrupt agenda based on misguided loyalty and i certainly would not want my kids to.

I was thinking more like temple sacrifices.

Would you sacrifice your children to God so that your nation could be spared from a natural disaster?

I think not. But religion tends to encourage this kind of non-critical blind faith. Just have faith!
 
I was thinking more like temple sacrifices.
A sacrifice is a sacrifice. It doesn’t matter whether its to God or to the State.

Atheists are famous for demanding sacrifices to the State, and more often than not, as in the case of North Korea or Maoist China or Stalinist Russia, sacrifices to a wicked State that persecutes all religions.

Get off your high atheist horse! 😉
 
A sacrifice is a sacrifice. It doesn’t matter whether its to God or to the State.
If you are saying that you would gut your children if a being claiming to be God (or a religion) asked you to, then i can only look down at the floor and shake my head.
Atheists are famous for demanding sacrifices to the State, and more often than not, as in the case of North Korea or Maoist China or Stalinist Russia, sacrifices to a wicked State that persecutes all religions.

Get off your high atheist horse! 😉
I am not an atheist.
 
If you are saying that you would gut your children if a being claiming to be God (or a religion) asked you to, then i can only look down at the floor and shake my head.

I am not an atheist.
What are you? :confused:

If you are talking about the God of Abraham you are barking up the wrong tree.

God did not let Abraham guts his son.

It was a test to see if he trusted God above his own instincts.

He passed.

Read Psalms 118:8. It is the exact center of the Bible, with 594 chapters before it and 594 chapters following it.

God is our center, the only one we can trust, and that is because God is not evil.

Only Satan demands human sacrifice.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2886237/Ten-year-old-boy-mutilated-sacrificed-witchcraft-ceremony-Indian-worker-thought-use-magic-make-wife-pregnant.html
 
God was teaching Abraham what a true sacrifice is. It is a “contrite spirit”, in contrast to the purely outward and superstitious sacrifices the pagans made.
 
This flies in the face of the standard answer to “how could God have allowed this to happen?” that leads so many people to a crisis of faith.

Usually their question is countered by “God is good, he works in mysterious ways, we just can’t see the big picture, you have to trust” etc.

Meaning, God has done something they consider reprehensible, yet they are counciled by other believers to keep believing in and worshiping a God who has done what they can only understand as evil.

Of course, when it comes to philosophy, people are perfectly capable of holding beliefs that are opposed to one another, and trotting out whichever one they want to apply at any given time. Myself included, lest anyone think I am pointing fingers.

Natural law or not, people have all through history believed gods to be capable of horrendously evil acts, yet continued to believe and worship them. Others make excuses that God’s acts only appear evil to people. Indeed some people worship all the harder because they believe God is likely to do some very evil and horrendous things to them if they don’t worship.
You know God isn’t controlling everything? That opposing forces like demons like Satan exist as a result of free will? That everyone has free will (so someone getting drunk and deciding to still drive for example) and makes their own choices

I’m pretty sure if God was in charge of everyone’s free will, stuff like people going into churches and doing awful things out of disrespect wouldn’t happen.

He’s your Creator you should worship him, that’s part of justice.

If you have a relative that dies suddenly, you might think that’s automatically evil for God to kill them. Well, God put them into existence but you are only given a small window to view the situation. That relative could’ve been in a deep depression and God brought them to heaven and they are blissfully happy and they will never suffer ever again. That’s just an example, but basically you don’t know the whole story so you can’t judge God’s decision.
 
The question is simple: Suppose God exists but that he’s reprehensibly evil by your standards. Would you serve him?
Of course I would serve him… grilled? baked? broiled? sautéed? skewered?.. not sure… but definitely on a silver platter. 😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top