S
StarFireKK
Guest
But Perfect before and Perfect after can still exist even if there was a change.I am not talking about any kind of specific time: I am talking about the metaphysical concept of change. A change logically involves a difference, and thus involves a “before” and an “after”. A change is not a change if there is no difference. If there is no difference, it would be crazy to talk about a “change”. Again, anyone who denies that is irrational - and that has nothing to do with my screen-name.
And I am not interested in explaining it again. If you cannot comprehend it, it is your problem from now on.
- A change without a difference is not a change.
- A difference without a “before the change” and “after the change” is not a difference.
- A “before” and an “after” presumes a time.
Think of it like this: You have a family with a mom and dad and four kids. They are happy and living their lives. They feel no lack. They consider their family just perfect or good or complete or anything other concept.
But then they have another child. Now they are mom, dad and five kids. They are still happy and living their lives and still feel no lack. They still consider their family perfect/good/complete.
I don’t think it is wrong to describe both families as “perfect/good/complete” despite the fact a change occurred.