H
Holly3278
Guest
Ok, I am glad that you were not insulted.Nope. Not insulted. So many people fall for the Protestant lie about Xmas, that I feel compelled to spread the truth about it.
Ok, I am glad that you were not insulted.Nope. Not insulted. So many people fall for the Protestant lie about Xmas, that I feel compelled to spread the truth about it.
Seems to be more cultural than a spiritual thing. I donât have a problem with it. I donât think of the tree as a Christian symbol though. Perhaps meaning can be read into it, like an anchor can be symbolic for hope, but thatâs about it.And we endure yet another month of people who think they have new info regarding Xmas trees.
What do you think of Xmas tree? Valid symbols? Pagan abominations?
While I understand your point my point is that there is nothing inherently Christian about decorated pine trees. The name doesnât change that.Donât fall for the lies. Christmas trees are specifically Christian.
Pine trees arenât, but Christmas trees, by definition, are Christian.
:coolinoff: I thought maybe we were being invaded by aliens or the Chinese.Using an X to abbreviate the word isnât taking Christ out. Youâve probably heard that from many sources, but itâs wrong.
crivoice.org/symbols/xmasorigin.html
I didnât read that whole piece, so I want to add that you pronounce Xmas, Kristmus. Like ETC is pronounce et seteraâyou wouldnât say etsee.
But what culture. It didnât spring from a Jewish culture or a Muslim culture. Itâs a Christian symbol in a Christian culture.While I understand your point my point is that there is nothing inherently Christian about decorated pine trees. The name doesnât change that.
A âChristmas Saleâ at a store isnât inherently Christian because itâs called âChristmasâ and a decorated pine treeâŚor any other treeâŚis not inherently Christian just because itâs called CHRISTmas tree. It is a CULTURAL rather than CHRISTIAN symbol.
Not all Christians have Christmas treesâŚthe Christmas tree is unique to Euro-AmericansâŚand it doesnât have a very long history in the grand scheme of things. Take your example of the Cross. Yes, it was, indeed, a symbol of shameâŚbut now CatholicsâŚmost Christians (minus JWs, LDS and a few wingnuts) recognize the cross as the symbol of ChristâŚnot so the Christmas tree. My experience is that most Christians in places like Africa, the middle east, asia, even parts of Europe and South America DO NOT have Christmas trees. So, while the Christmas tree might for you represent some Christian themeâŚfor many Christians itâs just a decorated tree.But what culture. It didnât spring from a Jewish culture or a Muslim culture. Itâs a Christian symbol in a Christian culture.
Pine trees used by the âpagansâ and others arenât Christian symbols.
I wonder if weâre defining âsymbolâ in different ways.
Before Christ died on the cross, the cross was a symbol of shame, intimidation - nothing good (like an electric chair or the table people are given lethal injections on, perhaps the wall people are shot against by firing squads). Criminals were killed on the cross, not good people. After Christ died on it, Christians (not Christ) decided to use it as a symbol of Christianity, making it Christian. There is nothing inherently Christian about a cross either, but no one is going around trying to convince Catholics that we shouldnât use it because it wasnât originally a Christian symbol. Iâm not sure that we even know what kind of Cross they used, and so there are many styles. Though only one (maybe none) accurately represents Christâs cross, all are accepted as thoroughly Christian symbols. Thereâs no reason not to accept any other Christian symbol as Christian. What about the fish symbol. Is there anything inherently Christian in it? Do other cultures use it in a different way? A dove? Can it be inherently a Christian symbol when it predates Christ?
The church uses lots of symbols that other religions and cultures use. Incense and candles are just two. I donât there there are many who would say that the candle at the Host isnât inherently Christian because other cultures used candles before Christ was born.
By that thinking, nothing is inherently Christian, because every symbol we have has been used before. Bread? Nope. Used before.
So itâs really about longevity?Not all Christians have Christmas treesâŚthe Christmas tree is unique to Euro-AmericansâŚand it doesnât have a very long history in the grand scheme of things. Take your example of the Cross. Yes, it was, indeed, a symbol of shameâŚbut now CatholicsâŚmost Christians (minus JWs, LDS and a few wingnuts) recognize the cross as the symbol of ChristâŚnot so the Christmas tree. My experience is that most Christians in places like Africa, the middle east, asia, even parts of Europe and South America DO NOT have Christmas trees. So, while the Christmas tree might for you represent some Christian themeâŚfor many Christians itâs just a decorated tree.
What about the âHoliday treesâ that are sold at Target, etc.?Donât fall for the lies. Christmas trees are specifically Christian.
Pine trees arenât, but Christmas trees, by definition, are Christian.
While I understand your point my point is that there is nothing inherently Christian about decorated pine trees. The name doesnât change that.
A âChristmas Saleâ at a store isnât inherently Christian because itâs called âChristmasâ and a decorated pine treeâŚor any other treeâŚis not inherently Christian just because itâs called CHRISTmas tree. It is a CULTURAL rather than CHRISTIAN symbol.
How about saying that Christmas trees are not a universally recognized Christmas symbol, but are a Christmas symbol that is recognized by some Christians? There are Christians who do recognize the trees as a religious symbol, and there are those that do not, and for those who do not, they are a cultural symbol.Not all Christians have Christmas treesâŚthe Christmas tree is unique to Euro-AmericansâŚand it doesnât have a very long history in the grand scheme of things. Take your example of the Cross. Yes, it was, indeed, a symbol of shameâŚbut now CatholicsâŚmost Christians (minus JWs, LDS and a few wingnuts) recognize the cross as the symbol of ChristâŚnot so the Christmas tree. My experience is that most Christians in places like Africa, the middle east, asia, even parts of Europe and South America DO NOT have Christmas trees. So, while the Christmas tree might for you represent some Christian themeâŚfor many Christians itâs just a decorated tree.
Although the decoration of fir trees began as a pagan tradition in Germany, the tradition not only carried over into Christianity but became a teaching tool for Christians as well.Christmas trees are secular holiday symbols that can and sometimes are imbued with Christian symbols. Nothing wrong with a Christmas tree but itâs not specifically Christian either.
Well, if you want to push a pointâŚthere is pagan use of the cross symbol before that recorded by Christians. But no, itâs not just about longevity, itâs also about general acceptance by people within a specific culture. I would say less than half the Christians use the Christmas treeâŚlike I said, itâs fairly regional to North Europe and the USâŚlarge parts of Italy donât use itâŚmost of AfricaâŚlarge parts of South AmericaâŚetc. What is it that is inherently âChristianâ about a Christmas tree other than the name?So itâs really about longevity?
Iâm sure there are things that Christians in other Christian cultures do that we donât. That doesnât mean that those symbols arenât Christian.
And the cross. Not all Christians use a crucifix as a Christian symbol. Does that mean itâs not Christian? And as I said, people in different areas use different crosses. Does that mean that crosses arenât really Christian - because the same one isnât used everywhere? What about Statues of Jesus and Mary? Some Christians think that they are idols. Does that mean that a statue of Mary in a church isnât a Christian symbol?
Actually, a pine tree is inherently a tree. A cross is inherently wood.Well, if you want to push a pointâŚthere is pagan use of the cross symbol before that recorded by Christians. But no, itâs not just about longevity, itâs also about general acceptance by people within a specific culture. I would say less than half the Christians use the Christmas treeâŚlike I said, itâs fairly regional to North Europe and the USâŚlarge parts of Italy donât use itâŚmost of AfricaâŚlarge parts of South AmericaâŚetc. What is it that is inherently âChristianâ about a Christmas tree other than the name?
From actually living abroad for a good portion of my life and seeing with my own eyes. The Christmas tree is a fairly recent addition to the celebration of Christmas having become popular only within the last few hundred yearsâŚand it is largely a Euro/American phenomenom. There are other places you can find them, but only because of European influences.Where did you get your statistic from?
Itâs OK that itâs a newer symbol. We all understand that. And itâs OK that itâs a symbol that started in one place and has spread elsewhere. And itâs OK that the symbol isnât popular everywhere. None of that means itâs not a Xian symbol. If the only acceptable Xian symbol has to be from the time of Christ, used absolutely everywhere, and have cropped up everywhere on Earth on itâs own (not spread from another area with the Christian missionaries, travelers, or immigrants), there is no Xian symbol.From actually living abroad for a good portion of my life and seeing with my own eyes. The Christmas tree is a fairly recent addition to the celebration of Christmas having become popular only within the last few hundred yearsâŚand it is largely a Euro/American phenomenom. There are other places you can find them, but only because of European influences.
Again, while I understand your point try to understand mineâŚthere is nothing inherently Christian about the Christmas tree other than the name. Large sections of Christianity such as the Greek Orthodox generally donât use themâŚunless theyâve come to the US or other western countries.Itâs OK that itâs a newer symbol. We all understand that. And itâs OK that itâs a symbol that started in one place and has spread elsewhere. And itâs OK that the symbol isnât popular everywhere. None of that means itâs not a Xian symbol. If the only acceptable Xian symbol has to be from the time of Christ, used absolutely everywhere, and have cropped up everywhere on Earth on itâs own (not spread from another area with the Christian missionaries, travelers, or immigrants), there is no Xian symbol.
By your definition there is no such thing as an inherently Xian symbol. Thatâs your opinion, but itâs wrong, and as you admit, itâs an opinion based on a bias born of the EO mindset. Itâs a Christmas tree, which is a Xian symbol, which is why others are annoyed by it when theyâre on display. Calling it a holiday tree seems to have appeased the masses. But a rose by any other name⌠The âholidayâ the tree is decorated for is Xmas just the same.Again, while I understand your point try to understand mineâŚthere is nothing inherently Christian about the Christmas tree other than the name. Large sections of Christianity such as the Greek Orthodox generally donât use themâŚunless theyâve come to the US or other western countries.
I have a reason for my biasâŚas a Chaplain Assistant in the Army working in conjunction with the Equal Opportunity guys we meet complaints about Christian symbols such as Christmas trees being displayed in workplaces, etc. That they are cultural rather than religious symbols is important.
Actually, Menorahs ARE religious symbolsâŚthe Star of David is secularâŚthe Cross is ChristianâŚthe Christmas tree not.By your definition there is no such thing as an inherently Xian symbol. Thatâs your opinion, but itâs wrong, and as you admit, itâs an opinion based on a bias born of the EO mindset. Itâs a Christmas tree, which is a Xian symbol, which is why others are annoyed by it when theyâre on display. Calling it a holiday tree seems to have appeased the masses. But a rose by any other name⌠The âholidayâ the tree is decorated for is Xmas just the same.
Crosses arenât inherently Xian either. Now, if we can convince you and other EO types that a cross is a holiday cross and not a Xian cross, we can put those up everywhere, too. Oh, and the nativity, too. Since everyone who was ever born, was born of a woman and a man, the nativity is really symbolic of all birth and is therefor a âholidayâ nativity. Put one of them up, too.
Some will settle for saying that a Xmas tree is only Xian in name, so long as they can âget awayâ with putting one on the City Hall lawn, but that flies in the face of reality.
And, while Xians are forced to say that a Xmas tree isnât a Xian symbol to have it displayed, the Jews are allowed to display a whole set of candles and donât have to say that the mennorah isnât a symbol of their religion. Same for the Star of David.
I wish Xians would stand up for themselves and their religion, rather than be weak appeasers to get what they know is right. Itâs a Xmas tree, so call it the Xian symbol it is!
No more Xian wimps!
And as Iâve said twice before, it makes no difference that the tree has spread from one area to another. The cross has, too. And the nativity scenes for that matter. And the Xmas tree is far more ubiquitous than you imagine. A Xian symbol doesnât have to be used by every single Xian in the world to be a Xian symbol. If that were the case, the crucifix canât be called a Xian symbol. Christ on the cross not a Xian symbol?! You see how silly your argument is.
Like I said, the candles are on public property without opposition. The Christmas tree, which is a Christian symbol (as much as you disagree) is there only in oppositions to complaints. And the nativity scenes, which are Christian symbols as well, as banned. In schools in which wearing religious symbols is banned, kids canât wear the Star of David.Actually, Menorahs ARE religious symbolsâŚthe Star of David is secularâŚthe Cross is ChristianâŚthe Christmas tree not.
I must comment on your post, I hope you can see charity in my comments, but I feel you need some help seeing truth as opposed to false teachings.Let me see, how many other things are pagan abominations?
Processions with a standard preceded by incense, definitely Roman (and I donât mean Catholic), Basilicas were law courts or something in ancient Rome. The use of vestments that have their origin in the dress of Roman nobles (chasubles), very suspect. I think the mitre is of Persian origin (blast that Ahmadinajad!)
So let us gather in barns with no symbolism, no pagan origins, and ditch those statues. There, you have a wonderful religion just like the Jehovahâs Witnesses.
Actually, my ideas on what are and are not religious symbols arenât âunique.â The candles are on public property without opposition because theyâre not Christian. Hereâs the deal, liberals only attack Christian religious symbols. LIBERALS have defined the Christmas tree as a Christian symbolâŚthat doesnât make it so. The only time Iâve seen the Star of David banned at a school was because they thought it was a GANG SYMBOL (Latin Kings and others use it as a Gang SignâŚthus not religious. (what school bans the wearing of religious symbolsâŚTHAT would be unconstitutional). Why do I insist the Star of David is a secular symbol? Because the Star of David is on the Flag of IsraelâŚA SECULAR State.Like I said, the candles are on public property without opposition. The Christmas tree, which is a Christian symbol (as much as you disagree) is there only in oppositions to complaints. And the nativity scenes, which are Christian symbols as well, as banned. In schools in which wearing religious symbols is banned, kids canât wear the Star of David.
It appears that you have a unique idea of what religious symbols are.