J
jman507
Guest
Seriously? Why would a person think that the father’s permission must be obtained? If anything if you want to get married as a sacrament in the church, the couple ought to have some idea about what is needed both for civil purposes and for religious purposes. If not it should be told to them at least by the pastor at some point in time.Your analysis seems a bit vague. To get to the point: if he asks his girlfiend’s father because either of them seriously thinks that the father’s permission is needed, then yes that is sexist and immoral. If they are doing it for pure form or “tradition” or “cuteness” or some twisted idea of “politeness”, and the man intends to disregard any lack of “permission”, then it is meaningless, pointless, trivialises the sacrament of matrimony and could even be a source of scandal. I maintain that it is a silly sexist pagan custom which is irreconcilable with the true meaning of the Christian Sacrament of Marriage.
One can still disregard a lack of permission on behalf of the parents, because the parents have no actual authority. (I’ll say though, if a parent is not going to give permission, they better be very careful about it. It had better be a battle worth fighting.) Even though that might make the act rather superficial, it does give an acknowledgement of appreciation and gratitude over the responsibility of their parenthood, of helping to form and protect the beloved child. It is an acknowledgement that others have at this point have sacrificed more out of love for her, for that said man should be humbled, and hope to follow the lead in the same vein, though in a different way. (If the parent in no way was responsible for her upbringing or was abusive, then I think it ought not be considered.) The ultimate authority of if the two should become married is with the two.
To blow it off for yourself is one thing, it is one thing to call it peculiar, but to extend that to make the whole thing generally a “tradition,” “cute,” “polite” and otherwise just plain wrong is overreaching. It can be abused, but it is not in itself wrong. The intentions that it is carried out is what matters. You accuse me of being vague, but the problem the whole matter is vague. It cannot be as narrowly defined as you make it. What defines it, is how the person doing it intends it as.