Yearning for Zion Ranch?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeanne71350
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jeanne71350

Guest
Hi everyone,

Well today Oprah did a special on the Yearning for Zion Ranch in Texas, which apparently is a LDS sect. I know there was a raid because there were young girls being married and sexually abused. I am a devout Catholic, but I was taught to respect other people’s faiths. I’m not sure how to feel about this. I strongly dissaprove with some of their practices, but I don’t know where to stand on this as a Catholic. Can someone help me out?

-Jeanne
 
They have the right to believe whatever they want but not necessarily a legal right to live according to their beliefs. Catholicism requires that we obey civil authority (unless it requires us to sin.) They were breaking Texas laws concerning polygamy and marriage age restrictions. As far as their right to live the way they want, that right is dependent on the laws in their state of residence.

As Christians and Catholics, we know that polygamy is wrong. Respect their right to believe what they want because it’s a right we all share as Americans but don’t concede to the propaganda that it’s a legitimate spiritual “alternative” to monogomy.

Oprah is in the business of stirring things up and it’s so unfortunate that she influences so many people.
 
They have the right to believe whatever they want but not necessarily a legal right to live according to their beliefs. Catholicism requires that we obey civil authority (unless it requires us to sin.) They were breaking Texas laws concerning polygamy and marriage age restrictions. As far as their right to live the way they want, that right is dependent on the laws in their state of residence.

As Christians and Catholics, we know that polygamy is wrong. Respect their right to believe what they want because it’s a right we all share as Americans but don’t concede to the propaganda that it’s a legitimate spiritual “alternative” to monogomy.

Oprah is in the business of stirring things up and it’s so unfortunate that she influences so many people.
I agree. The LDS Church is a religion with good faith filled people, but these people were taking it too far. It was just horrible seeing all of these girls and women who were one of three or four wives. I can’t understand how any Christ-centered religion could think that’s ok.

Thanks for clearing it up.

-Jeanne
 
I’m glad someone else saw this and posted.

I’m not quite sure what to think. I don’t think Oprah was given the entire story.

If she WAS given the entire story, then the U.S. government has perpetrated an outrage on this community. Bigamy excluded, it doesn’t sound like they were doing anything wrong, and to take the children away from the mothers was cruel.

But if she wasn’t given the entire story, and this whole thing was staged, well…

Everything looked pretty nice, didn’t it? A few generations ago, that’s the way MANY families in the U.S. rural areas lived. Got up early, morning prayers and Bible reading with the family (Protestant and Catholic), ate homemade breakfast together, work all day growing their own food and making their own clothes and tending the children, then gather for a homemade dinner, more devotions, and early bedtime.

Except for the multiple wives thing, this could be a picture of the way my Reformed Church great-grandparents lived. They had nine children, and the kids were constantly working whenever they weren’t sleeping or at church.

I have in my home a picture in a frame with the slogan “Christ is the Head of this House.” It belonged to my grandma, and while she was alive, she told me the story of how she got the picture. When she was a little girl, a travelling salewagon came to their farm. Each child was allowed to choose ONE thing that they wanted. My grandma–just a little girl at the time–chose that picture.

So was SHE in a cult because she didn’t select a toy or a doo-dad? No, that’s just the way the kids were back then.

Anyway, it’s funny that now we consider the YZR community other-worldly because they live the way everyone did a few generations ago.

I agree, the polygamy is sinful. BUT…I think it is the height of hypocrisy for them to be condemned when the U.S. government allows, even sanctions, shack-up relationships between a man and woman, and relationships between two people of the same sex. You can’t pick and choose which “relations” are OK and which aren’t. If living together out of wedlock and same-sex sex is OK, then why not polygamy? It’s not fair!

Frankly, I am less “offended” in my soul by the polygamist families (which we see throughout the Old Testament!) then I am by the couples who are shacking up, or by the same-sex couples that are involved in a sexual relationship.

I know all of the above are aberrations and deviant and sinful, but sorry everyone, I think those beautiful families full of children were a lot more “acceptable” (to me anyway) than those non-married couples and gay couples.

This just goes to show the reason behind asking that our government continue to recognize that **marriage exists between one man and one woman. **

In conclusion, I think that the only people who are coming out of this better off are the lawyers. I couldn’t believe it!–the men of YZR now have to work in the town to earn the money to pay off their lawyers. Good heavens, those YZR people were basically self-sufficient, living off the land, not making a whole lot of money because they didn’t need that much, and yet those lawyers demanded their fees anyway! What cold fish! It’s funny that the teenaged girl, Olive, announced that she was planning to become a lawyer! One thing that she learned in the outside world was how to make a whole lot of money (which it sounds like the town needs to pay the lawyers!)–become a lawyer herself!

Of course, perhaps the Ranch is richer than it looks. Not sure how, though? They don’t export anything, do they, like the Amish? And their land is basically worthless to developers, isn’t it?

BTW–I loved their hair! I have a really pronounced cowlick, and my hair does that “poofy” thing naturally! If I lived there, I would fit right in! I thought that the film of the young woman plaiting her hair was so pretty!

And didn’t they all look healthy? I wonder what their physical condition is? I didn’t see too many fat people, except for the pregnant ladies. And their skin and eyes glowed with health. And their teeth looked good, too–I guess that’s what happens when you don’t drink Coke and Mt. Dew all the time! I wonder if they have the same heart attack/stroke/cancer stats as all the other Americans? I wonder if there are any alcoholics or drug abusers in the ranch? (probably).

Or again–do you think we were seeing all the “healthy” people, and all the “non-healthy people” were hidden away during Oprah’s visit? After all, a lot was at stake here. Why wouldn’t the entire ranch conspire to fool all of us out here into thinking that they’re just sweet faith-filled people who won’t harm anyone? It wouldn’t be that difficult to hide people, especially since Oprah and her crew didn’t know their way around and were dependent on that man to guide them to different homes and buildings.

I hope that other people watched the show and will share their thoughts.
 
I agree, the polygamy is sinful. BUT…I think it is the height of hypocrisy for them to be condemned when the U.S. government allows, even sanctions, shack-up relationships between a man and woman, and relationships between two people of the same sex. You can’t pick and choose which “relations” are OK and which aren’t. If living together out of wedlock and same-sex sex is OK, then why not polygamy? It’s not fair!
👍 Never thought about it like that, that’s amazing!
 
I don’t understand how they are polygamists. Legally, the husband can marry only one woman. He is only a polygamist if he legally marries all the women, right? :confused:

It isn’t illegal for a man to live with several women that aren’t his legal wives, correct?

I am not defending the cult, just pointing out that it seems silly to accuse them of polygamy when none of them are legally married.

My worry has always been the accusation of child brides and abuse, not the many nonlegal marriages(or whatever they are called)
 
This is Texas law; gay marriage has not been legalized in Texas and people have been shacking up as long as there have been people to shack up. Very difficult to police that!

There are other communities that live rural, self-sufficient lives apart from others. The Amish, for instance. There are still actually Shakers, although not many since they remain celibate after joining. And there are quite a few religious communities that farm or produce items for sale to support themselves. They’re robust and healthy, too. Probably way happier than most of the rest of us. They get up at the crack of dawn, or earlier for prayer, live chaste lives according to their station in life - married or single - and in general don’t break too many state or federal laws. Living a simple rural life, happy, robust children and community members who have a healthy glow don’t make polygamy or lawbreaking less wrong. Polygamy is sold as a religious belief by polygamists who want to continue their lifestyle. Yes, there was polygamy in the Old Testament, in a primitive nomadic society in which a family could survive only as a clan. Women were also viewed as property until God gave the Jews laws governing divorce and little by little more value was placed on wives as people with rights of protection. This is not a primitive society. Polygamy isn’t necessary to maintain the strength of the clan. These people claim to believe that God has many wives and that to be holy, the men must have many wives, too. (You do realize what that implies about God, right? That’s sort of blasphemous in Christian terms.) The men in that commune are kind to their wives and children, but what does that prove? They hold absolute power and they base their gross self-indulgence on a so-called belief that God lives as they do. However, we have no way to combat this belief except through the law because we do believe in religious freedom. The way things are going in this country right now, though, it might not be long before polygamy is considered just another option and the neighbors next door will be telling your kids that God is a physical being who has a harem!
 
This community was started in southern UT and northern AZ, on the border of the two states. They have a history of crimes and abuses. These include abandoning their male teens, kicking them out, of their community. Not enough female to male ration when the believe is you must have at least 4 wives to make it heaven. So, the old men kick the young boys out and marry the little girls.

The also live a commune lifestyle. The individual people and families do not own anything. Everything is owned by their “church”. In UT, the assets of this organization we’re seized. They were defrauding the community and that state, both AZ and UT.

Warren Jeffs, the man now in prison for rape of a child and for arranging child marriages, was the leader of this group. As the state governments cracked down on his illegal activities, he chose families from this community who he believed were loyal. He reassigned wives to new men, including their children. And started the new community in TX.

They told the locals they were starting a hunting ranch. Soon enough, they’re building their temple and moving the loyal families in.

TX acted in the interest of the children. The history this community has is of abuse and criminal activity. Since one organization owns the entire ranch, there is no law applicable to individual property. One warrant is all that is needed for the entire property. That is what TX did.

They found evidence of child-bride marriages, as this community does. Children in custody of reassigned families, and not with their biological parents. TX is still sorting out some of these cases Just figuring out who the legal parents are required DNA testing. TX has dropped the majority of the cases. There are still a few that remain open. Twelve FLDS men have been indicted.

In the meantime, they are playing it up for all the sympathy they can get. These people lie, and lie a lot. They kick their own children out to the streets with no care in the world as to what happens to them. They marry off their own daughters to men who are three times their age with as many wives or more. I wouldn’t trust a thing they had to say.

Girls are nothing but a commodity for the appetites of old men.

If Oprah is defending this community, she has been duped.
 
I don’t understand how they are polygamists. Legally, the husband can marry only one woman. He is only a polygamist if he legally marries all the women, right? :confused:

It isn’t illegal for a man to live with several women that aren’t his legal wives, correct
So should government be in the marriage business at all? If a man wants to religiously marry several women, should it matter to the government?
 
This community was started in southern UT and northern AZ, on the border of the two states. They have a history of crimes and abuses. These include abandoning their male teens, kicking them out, of their community. Not enough female to male ration when the believe is you must have at least 4 wives to make it heaven. So, the old men kick the young boys out and marry the little girls.

The also live a commune lifestyle. The individual people and families do not own anything. Everything is owned by their “church”. In UT, the assets of this organization we’re seized. They were defrauding the community and that state, both AZ and UT.

Warren Jeffs, the man now in prison for rape of a child and for arranging child marriages, was the leader of this group. As the state governments cracked down on his illegal activities, he chose families from this community who he believed were loyal. He reassigned wives to new men, including their children. And started the new community in TX.

They told the locals they were starting a hunting ranch. Soon enough, they’re building their temple and moving the loyal families in.

TX acted in the interest of the children. The history this community has is of abuse and criminal activity. Since one organization owns the entire ranch, there is no law applicable to individual property. One warrant is all that is needed for the entire property. That is what TX did.

They found evidence of child-bride marriages, as this community does. Children in custody of reassigned families, and not with their biological parents. TX is still sorting out some of these cases Just figuring out who the legal parents are required DNA testing. TX has dropped the majority of the cases. There are still a few that remain open. Twelve FLDS men have been indicted.

In the meantime, they are playing it up for all the sympathy they can get. These people lie, and lie a lot. They kick their own children out to the streets with no care in the world as to what happens to them. They marry off their own daughters to men who are three times their age with as many wives or more. I wouldn’t trust a thing they had to say.

Girls are nothing but a commodity for the appetites of old men.

If Oprah is defending this community, she has been duped.
There’s a book out called Escape told by Carolyn Jessop who used to live in this community and chronicles not only her life (married young and the fourth wife of a much older man) but also the time leading up to and including the leadership of Jeffs. It covers the group’s time in AX and UT and covers a lot of what you mentioned. Carolyn finally left with her children but one of her daughters returned to this group.
 
Since the law cannot prevent a man from having a concubine (or plural), it is the same as any “shacking up” situation, or homosexuals living together. There can be no law against it, since it is a situation where two (or three or four or five) consenting adults choose to do what we consider immoral. The secondary “wives” may try to dignifiy themselves by calling themselves so, but they are concubines. The man still has the responsibility to his children.

However, the Book of Mormon has plenty to say about polygamy and concubinage. The way I read it, it is prohibited. 😃 I think that is the way any reader would read it, if it were written in plain and simple English.

However, the FLDS situation has institutionalized concubinage. That is where the abuses come in. 1. Discarding excess boys. 2. incest, or multi-generational semi-incest 3. concubines applying for state and federal assistance for thier children when thier husbands are perfectly capable of supporting them 4. underage marriage because of limited pool of girls 5 jealousy and hurt 6 forced marriage 7 paranoid view of outside world.

And these are the reasons why most religions prohibit such arrangements. It allows so many situations of abuse to enter in. I have real questions about a religion which prohibits alcohol but encourages concubinage. 😦
 
So should government be in the marriage business at all? If a man wants to religiously marry several women, should it matter to the government?
If a man or woman wants to shack up with several people and call them spouses, I don’t see what the government can do unless it prosecutes everyone who lives with several people.🤷
 
Some extreme fundamentalists advocate cheerfulness as being the only emotion acceptable for Christians.

Among these groups children are expected to not only be obedient but to do so cheerfully. Any child who expresses discontent is punished. This is not simply teaching a child to be respectful when asked to do a chore but the goal is to teach the child to control their emotions at an early age.

I do not know if the FLDS practice these types of child rearing techniques. It would be interesting to know if the kids are happy because they are honestly happy or if they feel that happiness is the only emotion that a Christian should express.
 
There is some gossip about “waterboarding” infants for crying. Just an internet rumor, I have no idea if it is true.
 
There is some gossip about “waterboarding” infants for crying. Just an internet rumor, I have no idea if it is true.
I have read that also but I didn’t want to repeat somethng that I was not certain about. The reasons for holding the infant’s head under running water was to teach it to control its emotions. 😦
 
If I am not mistaken, there are cases both in this YZR place and in other “polygamous communities” where since the second and so on wife cannot be legally married to the man, when they give birth, they list father as “unknown” and then go on welfare. At that time, the government then pays for the child’s basic needs. It is my understanding that the woman signs the check over to her “husband.” If this is true, I have a MAJOR issue with it. MAJOR. If you want to live in this mannor, please do not force me to pay for it.

Why is the government in the business of regulating marriage? Two reasons. Historically, women and children have had few legal rights. Up until recently, women were poorly educated and had limited job opportunities. Marriage laws gave them protection under the law that men did not have, such as claims for alimony and child support and community property laws. Second, there are specific issues with inheretance rights that probate courts have. Marriage laws make these easier to handle.
 
This community was started in southern UT and northern AZ, on the border of the two states. They have a history of crimes and abuses. These include abandoning their male teens, kicking them out, of their community. Not enough female to male ration when the believe is you must have at least 4 wives to make it heaven. So, the old men kick the young boys out and marry the little girls.

The also live a commune lifestyle. The individual people and families do not own anything. Everything is owned by their “church”. In UT, the assets of this organization we’re seized. They were defrauding the community and that state, both AZ and UT.

Warren Jeffs, the man now in prison for rape of a child and for arranging child marriages, was the leader of this group. As the state governments cracked down on his illegal activities, he chose families from this community who he believed were loyal. He reassigned wives to new men, including their children. And started the new community in TX.

They told the locals they were starting a hunting ranch. Soon enough, they’re building their temple and moving the loyal families in.

TX acted in the interest of the children. The history this community has is of abuse and criminal activity. Since one organization owns the entire ranch, there is no law applicable to individual property. One warrant is all that is needed for the entire property. That is what TX did.

They found evidence of child-bride marriages, as this community does. Children in custody of reassigned families, and not with their biological parents. TX is still sorting out some of these cases Just figuring out who the legal parents are required DNA testing. TX has dropped the majority of the cases. There are still a few that remain open. Twelve FLDS men have been indicted.

In the meantime, they are playing it up for all the sympathy they can get. These people lie, and lie a lot. They kick their own children out to the streets with no care in the world as to what happens to them. They marry off their own daughters to men who are three times their age with as many wives or more. I wouldn’t trust a thing they had to say.

Girls are nothing but a commodity for the appetites of old men.

If Oprah is defending this community, she has been duped.
So you are saying that Oprah was shown a “facade,” and that the real community life was hidden from her and her cameramen? That she was duped.

I suspect that, too. And I think Oprah suspected that, but in that particular visit, it would not have been appropriate for her to challenge the people too much.

I don’t blame Oprah for defending what she did see. Other than the polygamy, the ranch community was very simliar to some of the traditional Catholic pods in our city. In these pods, the women and girls all wear long prairie dresses and no makeup and do not cut their hair. The boys all wear slacks and tucked-in shirts. The children are well-mannered and pleasant. They are homeschooled and for the most part, kept separated from the rest of the community. They attend the TLM only. They’re not exactly supportive of the OF of the Mass, but they don’t publically condemn it, either. And these families are very large, with many children. And they all stick together, hence my term “pod.”

They’re a little strange. But I have gotten to know at least one of the families, and they’re very pleasant. Not really friendly. But I can’t say I blame them. I’m sure they are constantly facing criticism from people who think that they are a cult.

This is the kind of family that Oprah was shown, and no wonder she seems to support it. There’s nothing wrong with being a little “strange.”

However, I fear (and I think Oprah kind of thinks this too) that we were not shown the “whole story” and that she was kept away from the seaminess of the Ranch and from people who would have loved to give her an earful of the real story. I wonder how many bound, gagged young women were being held in basements as far away from the camera crews as possible.

E.g., when Oprah asked about the “beds” in the temple, the male guide was very vague in his answer. Of course, Oprah couldn’t challenge him because he would have turned her and her camera crew out the gate. But I wish that a more tenacious reporter could ask those same questions and demand adequate answers. And maybe they will after this presentation.

But I doubt it. As I said, it seems very hypocritical of the U.S. government or any state government to make laws against polygymous marriage or even against sex with minors when all over the country, condoms are handed out in Middle Schools with the assumption that these young teenagers WILL be having sex, and many of them will be having sex with boys or girls who are 18 or older.

If the U.S. government truly opposes young sex, then they shouldn’t make it easier.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top