B
bobolink
Guest
Would a phone call be a better thing to do? It just seems a bit officious to start issuing letters!
I know what you mean that it sounds a little official to be sending him a letter, but this way you will be able to cite from the exact Church document itself. Otherwise, if you’re over the phone, it would be much more difficult to cite an official Church document. It’s so much easier to write that in a letter. If the priest desires to be loyal to the bishops in authority over him, then he will submit to the document and if he is truly ignorant of that fact and is a good priest, then I would assume he would thank you for letting him know. If he is not a good priest and is stubborn or prideful or willfully disobedient to those who gave him his office, then he would likely just disregard the letter. I seriously doubt he would get offended either way.Would a phone call be a better thing to do? It just seems a bit officious to start issuing letters!
I disagree with this statement. To me, the homily is very important and should never be replaced with anything. And, the purpose of the homily is to explain the passage out of the gospel that was read, how can you replace that? I, personally, would be very disappointed to see anything but the homily when it was time for the homily.If it is being presented in place of the homily and the presider has no problem with it, it is totally appropriate and could be the key to getting the youth fired up. That is part of the purpose of a homily, getting people to think.
Nothing personal but I would have preferred to see the pastor play the part of the Lord, thought.
NO! A letter is the safest, clearest way to make such complaint. Keep a photocopy (or 4) of the original, signed document… so that, when you need to write the bishop, you enclose a copy of the letter you sent the priest. And, if it goes that far, to the CDW.Would a phone call be a better thing to do? It just seems a bit officious to start issuing letters!