YouTube and Atheist comments

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blade_and_Blood
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
i am not trying to make excuses for atheist. i know they attack religion and their followers with persistence, and I don’t agree with it. What i don’t like to see on here is the bigotry towards people outside of the religious discussion.
Again, you’re missing the point of my attack. Just because they don’t say bad things ‘outside of religious’ discussion doesn’t make the things within such discussion any less repulsive. Furthermore, the things they say within such discussion DOES extend outside it when you consider how I’ve seen atheists desire to be the ONLY ones suitable for public office, artistic expression, science, philosophy, and reducing the role of religion in civilization to something even less of an eccentric’s club.

I don’t care how many bad people you’ve seen within our religion. The fact is there are just as many bad apples in other world views, philosophies, beliefs etc. It’s the universal sign of our fallen nature.
 
I’m sorry to sound rude but you must note that some atheists and secularists themselves say the same things about homeless people. It isn’t something unique to Catholics because there isn’t a single saint in history who never gave alms to the poor. As for the unmarried men thing, I honestly NEVER saw a single person on this forum, catholic or not calling a non-married person deserving of punishment. When a Protestant woman who married her catholic husband outside both their churches and by the government, she complained that her rusty mother called her a ‘*****’ and a whore. Do you know how many catholics told her to go to hell? None. Simply none. She said she was surprised how kindly we received her and whatnot.

As for religion, I don’t think they fight so much as disagree. What, atheists can insult our religion with their pathetic insults yet we can’t give them or other religions reason why we disagree with their point of view? I never came across any Catholic who thinks because I’m a traditionalist Catholic then I am an anti-christ, and I’ve seen my fair share of polite atheists who were unbiased on these very forums, such as that when a Jewish member was accusing our Church for being nothing but an anti-semitic organization and he jumped in and gave documents showing the good the Church did for Jews. I’ve seen more ignorant, derogatory remarks from atheists who support the sour likes of Christopher Hitchens and Stephen Fry who all think they are smarter, wittier and more pleasant than their religious enemies.

Catholics are better than being jerks are they Mr. Pugnax? Being a jerk isn’t unique to Catholics now is it? And as for homosexuals, of course we disagree with their lifestyle which is fueled by lust no matter how they try to paint it. We don’t want them killed but how do you expect us to support a practice which to us is wrong and immoral?
I don’t think its right that Atheist saying anything against other human beings either. But we are suppose to hold the moral high ground in these situations and I just feel we don’t live up to it.

And I have had this conversation with other people and I usually always get the same childish answer back…“well the atheist do it too”. That just sounds like a debate that is better fitted to the playground then an adult conversation. Do I really have to be the parent here and be the one to say “two wrongs don’t make a right”.

As far as homosexuals being filled with lust, that is the most absurd comment. Have you ever met a gay person in you life or have been friends with one? If you had you would never uttered such a remark. You just took the time to tell me that Catholics are not hateful and then you spit out that hate. You may not think its hateful because, but that kind of shows the ignorance in these types of discussions within the devout. And the fact that you even had to mention that “you don’t want them kill” really give explanation of what I am trying to say. I have no problem with the catholic church feeling the sexual act is immoral, that is their belief and I won’t change that. But there is a difference between believing something is immoral based on faith and stripping another persons rights because you believe in said faith

I am sorry if I am rude but I am very passionate about this subject because my best friend is gay and I have seen what religion has done against him. This is a good man who wouldn’t hurt a soul yet he was so frightened about who he was because of the church and the people who persecuted him that he hid in his own private misery for years. He was beat up, verbally abused, put down and even fired once. You call his sexuality an emotion filled with lust. To which you are completely wrong. My friend knew he was different since he was 6 and knew he was gay when he hit puberty and understood what it meant. He has told me many times that he has had moments where he beg God to be straight so he wouldn’t have to go through the Hell righteous and bigoted people put him through. You act as if he had a choice, as if you knew exactly how it feels to be in his shoes. If you knew anything you would know that no one in their right mind would choose to be put through mental and physical torture like that if it was just a simple fix like toning down your emotional lust.

Jesus was all about compassion and yet see little on here for this situation. It saddens me. If you want to hear real stories about what people have gone through throughout lives (gay and straight) than you should go to the website itgetsbetter.com. If anything at least you’ll actually hear real people talk about their experiences. You’ll still not agree but you might have a better understanding (instead of “they just do it for lust” nonsense).

I have one final question. Have you ever asked yourself that maybe the reason the Atheists attack so much is because the church has encroached and overreached too far into politics,human rights(when it comes to stripping them from people), and what should be taught in school textbooks(creationism etc etc). Most Atheist I know, quiet ones and loud ones, tell me that they have no problem with the church and what people believe as long as it doesn’t involve itself within our politics and it doesn’t stripped anybody of their rights based on faith alone. And finally that it doesn’t teach our kids that the Earth is only 6000 years old for example. Now I know there are definitely Atheist out there that just want to attack no matter what or just for the fun of it, just like there are Christians holding “I hate Fags” signs at soldiers funerals, both sides have there crazies.
 
As a non-believer I have found most posters at least as respectful to me as I am to them. I do get a bit of (usually snide) “you are in league with the devil” stuff, and suggestions I will go to hell, but I guess that is what you expect visiting a site like this! The most often-repeated comment to me that I find distasteful is that I am trying to undermine the beliefs of others. I debate out of interest, and without any particular desire that others should share my muddled thinking processes! (Except on evolution that is - I get upset when people cut themselves of from this great explanatory tool).
 
I am christian, but a liberal one. I agree with you, I come on here because of interest and understanding as to what other people really think. Everyone on here has been kind to me. I just don’t like the hateful remarks when it comes to people of different sexual orientation. I am a christian who believes in evolution, equal rights for all, and I also believe religion should have no part in politics or schools. I know that sounds like heresy for some but I grew up in a very open household. Also living in Vienna, Barcelona, Tokyo, California and then back to Connecticut has open my eyes even more to many different cultures and ways of life and different people. I may disagree with some things but I have developed an appreciation for any type of individual.

I appreciate everyone’s opinion on here except when it comes to hurtful speech towards homosexuals. I just want people to understand that what they say, even though they are ignorant of it, is very hateful. The person above just said that homosexuality is just an emotion of lust. Now I know he/she didn’t think that was hurtful or a type of bigotry, but it really is and would love if the people of my religion would start understanding that more. It’s like if I told someone that they only are with their wife because they are horny and can have sex with her. It is born out of ignorance to a people that when said, usually the speaker has never even had any type of relationship with the person they are being ignorant towards. Saying homosexuality is a products of lust alone is just a way to dehumanize someone that they don’t know nor understand.

There is a really interesting stat that is being studied. People who were against gay rights only to find out someone close to them is gay are 3/4 likely to change there opinion on the issue because get a better understanding. For example, Dick Cheney changed his opinion of Gay rights when he found out his daughter was a Lesbian.
 
I have one final question. Have you ever asked yourself that maybe the reason the Atheists attack so much is because the church has encroached and overreached too far into politics,human rights(when it comes to stripping them from people), and what should be taught in school textbooks(creationism etc etc). Most Atheist I know, quiet ones and loud ones, tell me that they have no problem with the church and what people believe as long as it doesn’t involve itself within our politics and it doesn’t stripped anybody of their rights based on faith alone. And finally that it doesn’t teach our kids that the Earth is only 6000 years old for example. Now I know there are definitely Atheist out there that just want to attack no matter what or just for the fun of it, just like there are Christians holding “I hate Fags” signs at soldiers funerals, both sides have there crazies.
I’ll talk about homosexuality in a minute but regarding atheists not wanting the Church to involve itself with politics… why shouldn’t we? Thats like saying conservatives can’t involve themselves in politics because they don’t agree with what you believe. Secondly, the only ‘rights’ I see the Church ever haven’t supported are religious freedom and putting so many restrictions on Jews in its states. Let me explain:

In the middle ages, the council of Lateran (through an act which wasn’t infallible as it wasn’t a declaration of a dogma but a disciplinary action) decreed that Jews (and Muslims mind you) had to wear distinct clothing couldn’t work in certain important jobs. It was done not because the Church was anti-semitic but so that people wouldn’t involve themselves with he Jews an ruin their faith? It was excessive and unjust but it wasn’t a full fledged persecution and in fact, the Popes condemned the idea that Jews commit ritual murder, condemned the practice of killing them and force converting them. They even had them live in a special part of the city, called a Ghetto. There were rich ones like that of Venice, there were poor ones like that of Rome.

However, they could build synagogues and there was some freedom of religion for them, although Protestants couldn’t worship publicly and for good reason. Protestants wanted to destroy the Catholic Church and letting them preach without fighting against them was not going to happen. And no, the Church didn’t order them to be mass murdered. For one thing, the Roman Inquisition only killed some 1000 people and though their deaths are deplorable, it shows that it wasn’t a mass murder. It did order religious orders to preach against Protestantism which was both immoral and anarchist in the faith. It wasn’t persecution it was defending the faith.

Now on the subject of religious freedom, we don’t believe that people have a right to embrace any religion they want which isn’t the Catholic one. To us, all religions are false and bad because there is only one God and only one religion (something which almost all religions believe!) so to say they can embrace whatever they want without fear of going to hell is absurd. They have the freedom to embrace these religions, just as we have freedom, yes, but not the right to sin. I don’t have the right to abort my baby if I had one no matter what **** the US makes up. I have the freedom but not the right to do such a nauseatingly horrible thing. Do you get where I’m going with this?

The Church forbade public exercise of other religions not because it was a douchebag but because it wanted to prevent the morals of the nation from getting corrupted. It didn’t do it through killing them nor did it want to (as David Goldstein said, the Inquisition is no more guilty of murder than a jury is guilty of sending a man to the electric chair. While I doubted it at first, it truly was the state who killed the heretics while the Inquisition judged them and tried to make the guilty abjure their errors). Even then, people weren’t forced to become Catholic. There were forced conversions, yes, but they were never made with the consent of the Catholic Church and in fact it condemned such a practice. To go further, no one was killed for being a heretic under later Popes in the late 17th and 18th century (though laws, like those of other places of the time were still very harsh when it came to stealing and what not).

I know alot of atheists hate the Catholic Church for ‘stripping’ and ‘trampling human rights under her feet’ yet they forget that before the people they so support and look up to did the same things. The French revolution killed 40,000 and banned religion altogether. They forget to mention that people such as Rousseau and Voltaire supported anarchism and were against family bringing up the children. They forget that the very people, they look up to agreed with alot of the immoral things that were prevalent at the time such as slavery, racism and political disorder. And yet, they ignore completely the far from small good which people in the Catholic Church did. They ignore the fact that the Dominicans, Franciscans and other Bishops condemned the atrocities committed by the Spanish in America, they ignore the fact that the Catholic Church defined morality and the way we view it today and they are ignorant of what we truly believe in or twist it into something which is not.
 
To Pugnax,

If I disagree how gays live their lifestyle, its not hate as you said and my ‘gays are lustful comment’ was too vague. I’ll explain below. Its going to take very long but please bear with me.

I’m sorry your friend suffered, I really am and there certainly are tons of homosexuals who suffered the same way and I read alot of homosexual testimonies. However, without meaning to sound rude or to be unsympathetic to your friend and based on only what you told me, his suffering is no more great than that of alot of other people. There are catholics who got fired for being too devout though that isn’t a usual occurrence whatsoever. Devout Catholics everyday and I mean everyday suffer through doubts in their faith, being shunned by their friends and family for believing what they believe and taking it seriously, etc… the saints themselves had to suffer alot and intensely and you can read all about them in ‘Secular Saints’ by Joan Carroll Cruz.

We don’t believe that because you think your gay then you truly are. If you’re not itnerested whatsoever in he female body, thats TOTALLY FLIPPING FINE WITH US!!! I mean, come on, its obvious for crying out loud that it isn’t a sin to not be interested in women. But we treat lusting after the male body just as bad as lusting after the female body. If you look at a man with lust, your commiting adultery with him in your heart and this is the practice that the Catholic Church condmned. You must note also that just as we condemn homosexual lust, we condemn heterosexual lust, aka, pre marital sex and you know how much we condemn this practice. We don’t believe and never did believe that rape of men by women is a lesser sin than consensual sex made by two men, just because the former is ‘natural’ and the latter isn’t. Without sounding crude, we do violence to our passions and ‘suffer’ because of it just as homosexuals do violence to their own passions. In that regard, we are equal. We both have to remove our lust, just the diffirence between us is that heterosexuals love the opposite sex, gays love the same sex. In fact, some scientists (among them the complete monster they call Alfred Kinsey, the father of the sexual revolution and guilty of crimes gainst children) say that nobody is competely homo or heterosexual, jsut that some are more inclined towards one scale and the others the next. I disagree: I think it more has to do with lust. Hell, this guy proves it! (sorry but there is some crude language in this video):

youtube.com/watch?v=HFBb0fUqwJQ

Now there is the myth of being born homosexual. I’ll talk more about but first, would you mind giving your thoughts?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top