YouTube video "How can cities end homelessness?"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxirad
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
All the housing first does is relieve the stress of housing…which is a big needed step but it’s not enough by itself, obviously, but cookie cutter plans for treatment needs expansion, too.
And we must also realize that there is a portion of the homeless (I don’t know offhand what percentage, but I believe that it is small) who feel more stress trying to live in a regular house/apartment and meet those expectations than they do being homeless.
 
Based on the numbers he was using less than 2 tenths of one percent of the US population is homeless. When you look at the number 500,000+ seems like a lot, when you look at the percentage, doesn’t seem like much at all.

My solution. Take retired military bases, ( they are usually close to major cities) and turn them into homeless camps. Put up military tents, set out places for the people to make gardens and for kids to play when there. Provide transportation to the city for work if they have a job. Provide mental health and or drug assistance to those who need/want it.

If the folks have the desire and things improve in their lives they will move on, if they have no desire they simply stay there and don’t become a nuisance to the community.

Our city tore down some of the old projects, and built new supposedly mixed use housing at a price of about 147k per unit, or more than twice the average price of a home in our city. It didn’t end up being mixed use, it simply became subsidized housing and the residence are tearing it up. The old one was built out of brick and concrete, really hard to tear up, not the new pretty ones. Complete waste of taxpayer dollars.

Lets not forget what happens to the price of housing for those who have to purchase or rent their own place to live. Once gov. dollars start to influence the market, housing prices quickly increase making it difficult for lower income working people to find what was once affordable housing. The market has been artificially influenced so prices rise.

Sounds like the housing first initiatives that he is speaking of would do a number on the real market value of housing for ordinary people.
 
I have no answers. But treating the homeless as human beings seems like a good start.
 
If the treatments we are currently using have terrible outcome success, then we still have the problem of addiction and are now just having addicts with free housing. That’s what I mean by we haven’t solved anything.
OK, that makes more sense. Yes, evidence-based interventions are essential. I’m wondering if subsidized residential treatment would be better for accountability. Kicking an addiction is a bear.
 
I’m wondering if subsidized residential treatment would be better for accountability. Kicking an addiction is a bear.
As long as they can stay for much longer periods of time. The problem right now is most treatments are 6-12 weeks. They may have kicked the addiction at that point but the tools they need to learn can’t be taught and ingrained in that short of time. They just go back to their addicted friends and start all over. They need time to break these friendships, learn coping mechanisms and have their health improve enough to actually feel the benefits of not being addicted. Learning new healthy habits and life skills takes so much longer than these brief treatments right now. We need to do better to help them really get better!
 
There are so many other issues other than just treating the symptoms. Suggestions of addiction clinics, mental illness clinics & cheaper housing are all valid & very admirable.

What about a broader approach such as;

Unemployment
Minimum wages
Finance
Competition
Education

Prevention is always better than a cure
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top