‘13 Hours’ Gives Benghazi Attack Cinematic Treatment [NY Times]

[7_Sorrows]

Politics depress me. Am I the only one that questions the time of this picture’s release? What if the main charechtors had been Trump or another person of the right? Things might look a tad different then.

but they weren’t. we have to face the truth.

 

[Phil502]

Good movie. Our soldiers are amazing. Well worth the price of the ticket.

 

[7_Sorrows]

Good movie. Our soldiers are amazing. Well worth the price of the ticket.

 

[QNDNNDQDCE]

I don’t need a video to find out what Jeffrey Dahmer said, the British Government just said it is probable Putin authorized a killing of a Russian National in London. I don’t need to watch men of this repute speak. What’s next? Listen to the author of Mein Kampf ?

Obama famously authorized the killing of an American citizen in 2011 as well.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Awlaki

For whatever faults of the Russian government, the American government probably does not have any claim to a moral high ground on the whole.

 

[Path_Finder]

Obama famously authorized the killing of an American citizen in 2011 as well.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Awlaki

For whatever faults of the Russian government, the American government probably does not have any claim to a moral high ground on the whole.

And Anwar al-Awlaki was a top leader in Al Qaeda. And he was hit in Yemen. So, is one asserting a leader of Al Qaeda should not have been hit? Can one say if one does not want to hit a terrorist, they are siding with the terrorists? Are we saying Terrorists should not be hit? If Yemen wants to prosecute President Obama, they can but I have a feeling the government there, welcomed the action of the US in getting al-Awlaki, the apocalyptic terrorist. Does the US have laws that allow it to go after terrorists? It may.

If Yemen have a spat with America, they can issue their report but in this case, they welcomed American involvement to kill a leader of Al Qaeda.

Please demonstrate where the British government welcomed Russia to kill Litvenenko if this is so similar!

 

[Path_Finder]

Yes, I agree, the US is just more sneaky/ manipulative, and has a more convincing media than some other countries, they know a certain percentage of people are always going to believe everything they hear on the mainstream media, so they use that to their advantage.

Im pretty much convinced, in the US we only hear what ‘news’ we are meant to hear.

I’m pretty much convinced the record shows a long list of journalists have been killed in Russia or die under mysterious circumstances. I am likewise convinced, we don’t have that in the West. So, if one wants to choose a State Media as where one learns their news, that is their choice to make.

 

[Path_Finder]

Politics depress me. Am I the only one that questions the time of this picture’s release? What if the main charechtors had been Trump or another person of the right? Things might look a tad different then.

The names of the Secretary of State or the President are never, never-ever mentioned, so if what this is, is asserting they are main characters, this would be false.

I would think a tale where American soldiers save dozens of lives, over 40, maybe 60 is a tale that could be told at any time. Perhaps, to assert a nefarious motive should be questioned.