A
aprilfloyd
Guest
aprilfloyd;10386033:
You would need religion for that.Why didn’t the first atheist murder the second?
People don’t do crazy things in the name of atheism
Plus they have morals
aprilfloyd;10386033:
You would need religion for that.Why didn’t the first atheist murder the second?
People don’t do crazy things in the name of atheism
Plus they have morals
Man has created many gods indeed. That is one reason God came to meet man in friendship.Of the thousands of God’s I can’t think of one that man did not invent
buffalo;10386100:
Pol Pot would say otherwise.You would need religion for that.
People don’t do crazy things in the name of atheism
Plus they have morals
I don’t think you do because you have an innate sense of moralityFine. I believe it is moral to enslave you and all of your family and friends, because that is what I think is Right.
buffalo;10386100:
Did the first atheists have morals?You would need religion for that.
People don’t do crazy things in the name of atheism
Plus they have morals
Red China begs to differ.People don’t do crazy things in the name of atheism
Plus they have morals
Beautiful, you are correct. God is written in every human heart. (your Catholic upbringing is showing through.)I don’t think you do because you have an innate sense of morality
aprilfloyd;10386119:
You think pol pot did what he did because he was not a catholic?Pol Pot would say otherwise.
OxygenMan;10386126:
No. You made the claim that atheists have not done horrible things to carry out their own personal morality. They most certainly have.You think pol pot did what he did because he was not a catholic?
But you’re Wrong, from my point of view, because you’ve already said that Right and Wrong are subjective. It is completely moral for me to kidnap you and your family and friends.I don’t think you do because you have an innate sense of morality
You are funnyBeautiful, you are correct. God is written in every human heart. (your Catholic upbringing is showing through.)![]()
OxygenMan;10386126:
Non believers in the 20th century were responsible for over 100 million deaths. Why? Power wins. Man has no dignity in their eyes. That would be the definition of immoral.You think pol pot did what he did because he was not a catholic?
aprilfloyd;10386141:
Indeed. Hitler thought that the concentration camps were moral. The pictures of the doctors and aides at those camps, when they weren’t working, show them smiling and laughing. They are at peace with the God-awful things they did to other human beings.No. You made the claim that atheists have not done horrible things to carry out their own personal morality. They most certainly have.
Please explain how their own subjective view of being Right excuses the atrocities they committed.
aprilfloyd;10386141:
I meant in the name of atheism .No. You made the claim that atheists have not done horrible things to carry out their own personal morality. They most certainly have.
Atheism is not a group of people who act together
OxygenMan;10386147:
It does not.Indeed. Hitler thought that the concentration camps were moral. The pictures of the doctors and aides at those camps, when they weren’t working, show them smiling and laughing. They are at peace with the God-awful things they did to other human beings.
Please explain how their own subjective view of being Right excuses the atrocities they committed.
OxygenMan;10386147:
No no no, we’re talking about Right, Wrong and Morality.I meant in the name of atheism .
Atheism is not a group of people who act together
Please explain why the executioners and doctors at the concentration camps were evil for what they did. They thought they were in the Right.
Lochias;10386160:
…so…even though they THOUGHT they were right…they were wrong? There was an objective Truth that shows their actions for the monstrosities they were?It does not.
Therefore, it’s also true that Right and Wrong are not ALWAYS subjective?
You’ve said that Right and Wrong are subjective.What do you mean?
Yep. Let’s just create right and wrong out of thin air. All you’re hearing folks is attempts to impose the Dictatorship of Relativism.You’ve said that Right and Wrong are subjective.
But then you called what the Nazis did Wrong, while they thought what they did was Right.
Which is it: Are there many times when Right and Wrong AREN’T subjective, but instead objective, or should we have just left those poor, misunderstood Nazis alone, 'cause who are WE to tell them what’s right and wrong?
![]()