G
gilliam
Guest
Pope’s latest interview: ‘I quote the Gospel, they call me a Communist’ cruxnow.com/church/2015/01/11/popes-latest-interview-i-quote-the-gospel-they-call-me-a-communist/ …
Yeah well keep in mind that it was the ultra-conservative Rush Limbaugh that said what Pope Francis was preaching “pure Marxism.”The problem, I think, is honestly with the media. Pope Francis challenges both the left and the right to find the “true center,” which is Christ.
The problem is, liberal media has a tendency to spin everything in favor of themselves and ignore the parts they don’t like, and conservative media has a tendency to point fingers, blame and scapegoat. This combination makes Papa Francesco automatically comes off like a raving liberal, even though he’s not. He’s just an honest Christian sinner, like the rest of us.
When at the core of the system we don’t have men but money, when money becomes an idol, men and women become nothing more than instruments of a social system dominated by profound unbalances,” he said.
Francis said that the global need to find a solution for poverty is something that can no longer be put on hold, and that without a solution, the other problems of the world won’t be solved, either.
Amen. Let us pray that Christianity is not desecrated by materialism in the form of communism or excessive capitalism.The pope called for a more ethical economic system and more ethics in politics, saying that many of the world politicians who visit him at the Vatican are looking for ethical suggestions from him and other religious leaders.
I think the government should use tax money to help the poor with the essentials of food, shelter, and clothing.
But the government shouldn’t be using taxpayer money on evils like abortions and calling this helping the poor.
Rush is… not someone I’d listen to. And I’m conservative.Yeah well keep in mind that it was the ultra-conservative Rush Limbaugh that said what Pope Francis was preaching “pure Marxism.”
religion.blogs.cnn.com/2013/12/02/rush-limbaugh-vs-the-pope/
Jim
The media doesn’t like to cover those comments. It doesn’t fit their narrative.I’d love to hear Pope Francis say, I quote Church teachings on abortion and homosexuality and they call me a Fascist.
Oh, well, if you’re going to quote from Mater et Magistra, there are a few more relevant quotes:As Christians, we are supposed to help those who are less fortunate than us, but this is supposed to be from our heart and out of our virtue and sense of charity. Conservatives believe in helping the needy through charitable contributions rather than by government coercion. Here’s why the left is wrong when they say that Jesus was a socialist:
"One of the multitude said to him, ‘Teacher, bid my brother divide the inheritance with me.’ But he said to him, ‘Man, who made me a judge or divider over you?’” - Luke 12:13-14
“Each one must do as he has made up his mind, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.” - 2 Corinthians 9:7
Pope Pius XI further emphasized the fundamental opposition between Communism and Christianity, and made it clear that no Catholic could subscribe even to moderate Socialism. The reason is that Socialism is founded on a doctrine of human society which is bounded by time and takes no account of any objective other than that of material well-being. Since, therefore, it proposes a form of social organization which aims solely at production, it places too severe a restraint on human liberty, at the same time flouting the true notion of social authority. - Pope St. John XXIII - On Socialism
Concerning the use of material goods, Our Predecessor declared that the right of every man to use these for his own sustenance is prior to every other economic right, even that of private property. The right to the private possession of material goods is admittedly a natural one; nevertheless, in the objective order established by God, the right to property cannot stand in the way of the axiomatic principle that “the goods which were created by God for all men should flow to all alike, according to the principles of justice and charity”
In economically developed countries, relatively unimportant services, and services of doubtful value, frequently carry a disproportionately high rate of remuneration, while the diligent and profitable work of whole classes of honest, hard-working men gets scant reward. Their rate of pay is quite inadequate to meet the basic needs of life. It in no way corresponds to the contribution they make to the good of the community, to the profits of the company for which they work, and to the general national economy.
We therefore consider it Our duty to reaffirm that the remuneration of work is not something that can be left to the laws of the marketplace; nor should it be a decision left to the will of the more powerful. It must be determined in accordance with justice and equity; which means that workers must be paid a wage which allows them to live a truly human life and to fulfill their family obligations in a worthy manner.
Economic progress must be accompanied by a corresponding social progress, so that all classes of citizens can participate in the increased productivity. The utmost vigilance and effort is needed to ensure that social inequalities, so far from increasing, are reduced to a minimum.
Experience suggests many ways in which the demands of justice can be satisfied. Not to mention other ways, it is especially desirable today that workers gradually come to share in the ownership of their company, by ways and in the manner that seem most suitable. For today, even more than in the time of Our Predecessor, “every effort must be made that at least in future a just share only of the fruits of production be permitted to accumulate in the hands of the wealthy, and that an ample sufficiency be supplied to the workers.”
This, of course, is not to deny the lawfulness of State and public ownership of productive goods, especially those which “carry with them a power too great to be left to private individuals without injury to the community at large.”
Systems of social insurance and social security can make a most effective contribution to the overall distribution of national income in accordance with the principles of justice and equity. They can therefore be instrumental in reducing imbalances between the different classes of citizens.
You left out healthcare? Matthew 25:31-46 specifies taking care of the following for the least of us: food, drink, sickness, incarceration and if they are strangers (foreigners)I think the government should use tax money to help the poor with the essentials of food, shelter, and clothing.
But the government shouldn’t be using taxpayer money on evils like abortions and calling this helping the poor.
Sounds like the Pope is channelling Dom Helder Camara!Pope’s latest interview: ‘I quote the Gospel, they call me a Communist’ cruxnow.com/church/2015/01/11/popes-latest-interview-i-quote-the-gospel-they-call-me-a-communist/ …
He was the bishop (from Brazil?) who said something like “when I feed the poor, they call me a saint, but when I ask why they’re poor, they call me a Communist,” right?Sounds like the Pope is channelling Dom Helder Camara!
Systems of social insurance and social security can make a most effective contribution to the overall distribution of national income in accordance with the principles of justice and equity. They can therefore be instrumental in reducing imbalances between the different classes of citizens.Oh, well, if you’re going to quote from Mater et Magistra, there are a few more relevant quotes:
The bishop probably was influenced by marxism. When people speak of the root causes of poverty,they are usually speaking suggestively of the free market economy and businesses. But before marxism,the root causes of poverty were always known to be sloth,lack of industry and resourcefulness,ignorance and dissipation,because that is what people commonly observe.He was the bishop (from Brazil?) who said something like “when I feed the poor, they call me a saint, but when I ask why they’re poor, they call me a Communist,” right?
Wise words. How can one help the poor without understanding why they’re poor?