‘Mass shooting' reported at Sutherland Springs church in Texas

  • Thread starter Thread starter tvknight415
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And that even brings us to healthcare doesn’t it? What do the healthcare reform proposals have to say about mental health?

Between enrollment in exchange plans and those Medicaid plans, the ACA provided a parity guarantee for mental-health and substance abuse services for over 30 million people, many of whom faced the most dire issues on those fronts.

The American Health Care Act would undo that. The AHCA’s provisions to sunset the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion and discontinue enhanced funding for able-bodied low-income adults would remove critical mental-health funding for those enrollees. But even for those who remained eligible for Medicaid, the bill would also create per-capita caps on funding, and establish state-optional block grants that would constrain the overall per-person funding per state—which is currently open-ended. The block grants would also cap the number of people who could enroll in a state, and would allow states flexibility to skirt parity rules and create more barriers to mental-health care for enrollees.


While the health care–reform debate raged over the last eight years, a quiet progressive victory made lives better for millions of people with surprisingly little controversy—the simple idea that mental health should be taken as seriously as physical health. That’s because a broad coalition of advocates ensured that the Affordable Care Act included the concept of “mental health parity”—meaning insurance providers must provide equality in services for mental- and physical-health care.

But now the Trump administration threatens to just as stealthily unravel the modest gains in mental-health equity by shredding the ACA, sinking those millions deeper into silent despair.

 
V
Take them away, obviously.

Yup, take them all away, works every time, right?

Like it did here:
Code:
nationalreview.com
How the Nazis Used Gun Control

The perennial gun-control debate in America did not begin here. The same arguments for and against were made in the 1920s in the chaos of Germany’s Weimar Republic, which opted for gun registration. Law-abiding persons complied with the law, but the…

…whoops, that didn’t end well, 13 million people killed by their own government.

Or like it did when the Soviet Union implemented gun control in 1929…whoops, that didn’t end well, 20 MILLION people were killed by their government.

How about when China implemented firm gun control in 1935? How did that work out?? Whoops…there went another 20 million people killed by their government.

Careful what you wish for. Just like I’m the guy who you would want sitting next to you in mass if something like this happened, I’m also the guy you would want armed if the jack-thugs came to your door rounding up Catholics.

Rules for Radical…just one of eight on the list,taking away a citizens’ right to bear arms…
 
At some point I just came to accept that maybe Americans are just a slightly more violent bunch compared to Europe and Australia. I’m not sure it is “the media” causing it since they are greatly driven by profit, a proxy for demand). I honestly don’t think there is a practical solution because.
  1. the genie is already out the bottle. There are more guns than people.
  2. further limits or attempted confiscation is likely to be bloody. Such government acts would match the “tyrannical government” checklist and get a response based on that.
  3. new technology will make it possible to make guns at home. A few have already been 3d printed.
  4. high gun ownership has some national security perks. Even if a foe defeats our military, the number of guns owners makes occupation undesirable.
    (During WWII, Japan worried there’d be a rifle behind every blade of grass of they invaded the main land.)
 
Yes America is more violent but not compared to Brazil or South Africa. We also are less violent than historical Europe.
 
Not to interrupt the bull session with the topic, but I was reading that this seems to be an extension of a domestic disturbance. The connection between the killer and his victims was that it was his mother-in-law’s church, whom he was feuding with.
Supposedly he was sending her threatening texts from his phone before the shooting.
Maybe that is why she wasn’t in church. She will live with this burden forever.
 
Stephen Willeford, who shot the killer in a one-on-one gunfight, is a former NRA instructor.
 
The USAF failed to enter its conviction of the killer into the national database. That would have prevented the killer from purchasing his gun. The killer also lied on his form when he bought the gun.

Reported in detail by Mark Levin on his radio program this evening before, during and after his interview with the Governor of Texas.

John R. Lott stated that if more people had guns, the killer would have been driven off earlier.
 
Last edited:
The USAF failed to enter its conviction of the killer into the national database. That would have prevented the killer from purchasing his gun. The killer also lied on his form when he bought the gun.
So the government we trust to protect us failed to do so?
 
Because serious people oppose gun violence, the source of which is the easy availability of guns in our country.
 
The vast majority of gun violence occurs in a handful of US cities and is committed by about 1% of the population. Why do you think it reasonable, or consistent with Catholic doctrine to penalize the other 99%?
 
You would become a target for the shooter and the police. Please stay away from my family.
Yes, I would rather take fire in my direction than yours, and I would be moving.

But then again, the vast majority of these mentally ill/evil murderers are cowards and, like this one, runs away at the first sign of resistance.
 
Because serious people oppose gun violence, the source of which is the easy availability of guns in our country.
no the source of gun violence is the fallen nature of man.

even if every gun were magically removed violence would still exist.

yeah i know we wouldn’t call it gun violence.

like australia they haven’t had a gun massacre since the ban; what they don’t tell you is that they still had as many mass killings as before the ban just not with a gun.
 
I think we all know he came to that Church for a reason. Whether he was going to hunt down the in-laws we will never know. At the very least Stephen Willeford’s actions might have saved the life on a police officer or deputy sheriff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top