J
JimG
Guest
It’s a strange story.
In a philosophy class, a student is told by the teacher (a graduate student) that he cannot argue against same sex marriage in class becausee that is homophobic and offensive, and not allowed in her class. He is invited to drop the class.
The student complains to other professors.
One professor blogs about the incident, takng the student’s side and favoring free speech.
The university administration comes down on the blogging professor and insists that he apologize to the graduate student / teacher. He refuses, and is terminated from a tenured position.
The prof sues the university, loses in state court, and appeals to the state supreme court. The case is yet undecided.
I guess the moral of the story is: it’s just not acceptable to argue against same sex marriage at a Catholic university.
In a philosophy class, a student is told by the teacher (a graduate student) that he cannot argue against same sex marriage in class becausee that is homophobic and offensive, and not allowed in her class. He is invited to drop the class.
The student complains to other professors.
One professor blogs about the incident, takng the student’s side and favoring free speech.
The university administration comes down on the blogging professor and insists that he apologize to the graduate student / teacher. He refuses, and is terminated from a tenured position.
The prof sues the university, loses in state court, and appeals to the state supreme court. The case is yet undecided.
I guess the moral of the story is: it’s just not acceptable to argue against same sex marriage at a Catholic university.