E
EndTimes
Guest
Along with the time-wastefulness of uber-engaging in any said talking of the talk about itā¦Indeed. Which emphasizes the mootness of the point.
Along with the time-wastefulness of uber-engaging in any said talking of the talk about itā¦Indeed. Which emphasizes the mootness of the point.
Plus. And Godās Kingdom - which is currently unobservable to us - is Very Useful to usā¦Any why does it matter if it is useless to US? God loves and cares for all creation, from the lowloest atom.of inanimate matter upwards.
You are not going to be able to observe it. What is on the other side of the boundary of the observable universe is moving away from us faster than the speed of light. It is impossible to get any information from it as information cannot travel faster than that.Freddy:
Why on earth should something be useless to us just because we have not (yet) observed it?tafan2:
There is no connection between the observable universe and that which is beyond the boundary. It literally cannot affect us in any way, by definition. The ocean water and the antarctic ice form part of the environment and that environment would change if neither existed (as we might find out to our cost if the antarctic ice keeps dissapearing). So they do contribute to our existence. As does everything on the planet. It is all interlinked. All useful.@Freddy, I mentioned the water at the bottom of the ocean and the Antarctica ice, if that was useless. It is part opf our world, which sustains us. As does the sun. What else do we need? I am not a physicist to say for sure, but I suspect our solar system may not be able to exist on its own, within the laws of physics, without the surrounding galaxy. I suspect the Milky Way sustains us also. Taking it further, are you claiming the Milky Way would be stable without the surrounding galaxies? And would those galaxies be stable without the rest?
Are you so sure that the universe, as it exists, does not contribute to our sustenance? If it sustains us, how is it useless?
Perhaps you have better theoretical physics knowledge than I.
The āunobservable universeā has no use to us.
Any why does it matter if it is useless to US? God loves and cares for all creation, from the lowloest atom.of inanimate matter upwards.
If something is useful to any part of creation in any way, you can be sure it matters to Him.
Izzat so? Chapter and Verse?What is on the other side of the boundary of the observable universe is moving away from us faster than the speed of light.
Yepā¦Freddy:
Izzat so? Chapter and Verse?What is on the other side of the boundary of the observable universe is moving away from us faster than the speed of light.
Say so - no support - so noā¦Yepā¦
Sorry. I thought this common knowledge. Space itself is expanding. How are galaxies moving away faster than light?
could beā¦ but is Fraser Cainās stanceā¦ accepted by all astro-physicists?Sorry. I thought this common knowledge. Space itself is expanding. How are galaxies moving away faster than light?
Iām sorry. That was as simple an explanation in that link that I could find. Maximum velocity is fixed. But that doesnāt mean that two things canāt be moving apart from each other at a rate which exceeds the speed of light.Freddy:
could beā¦ but is Fraser Cainās stanceā¦ accepted by all astro-physicists?Sorry. I thought this common knowledge. Space itself is expanding. How are galaxies moving away faster than light?
AND - getting back to 'faster than the speed of light" ā Cain ends with:
I stand with Einstein when I say that nothing can move faster than light through space, but objects embedded in space can appear to expand faster than the speed of light depending on your perspective.
It could be for someone else, but it is possible that it is not something that serves a purpose.I have something here for you. I made it. Do you find it of any use?
I believe he introduced the Lorentz factor to show this mathematically.I stand with Einstein when I say that nothing can move faster than light through space
Not according to Einsteinā¦Maximum velocity is fixed. ā YEPā¦ SPEED OF LIGHT
But that doesnāt mean that two things canāt be moving apart from each other at a rate which exceeds the speed of light.
Iām afraid that you are going to have to accept that thereās an infinity of existence beyond the observable universe that is forever unreachable.
Einstein isnāt wrong. Velocity is fixed at a maximum. But galaxies outside the observable universe arenāt necessarily moving at a velocity relative to us. The ācomovingā distance (that is the distance measured were the universe not expanding) could be fixed. But the space between us is increasing so the āproperā distance is increasing.Freddy:
Not according to Einsteinā¦Maximum velocity is fixed. ā YEPā¦ SPEED OF LIGHT
But that doesnāt mean that two things canāt be moving apart from each other at a rate which exceeds the speed of light.
Iām afraid that you are going to have to accept that thereās an infinity of existence beyond the observable universe that is forever unreachable.
You can take that up with NASA:But that would mean the mass of the objects in question would be more than infinity, which is impossible.
Arenāt necessarily? ā¦ Could be? ā¦ Could change? ā¦ Suggests? .But galaxies outside the observable universe arenāt necessarily moving at a velocity relative to us.
Iām saying that they may not be to illustrate the fact that even if they arenāt then the distance between us is expanding faster than light can travel.Freddy:
Arenāt necessarily? ā¦ Could be? ā¦ Could change? ā¦ Suggests? .But galaxies outside the observable universe arenāt necessarily moving at a velocity relative to us.
Exists in the Realm of Speculation.
Some scientists say that there are aliens here on earth now, but we may not be able to detect them with our senses.I think it is possible there is life in other planets or galaxies
Noā¦ Iām showing how terms such as: " arenāt necessarily" and "āmay notā (= āmayā), et cetera, when employed within any argument - should be realized as undermining any Discussion whose intention is to come to a resolution of a Questionā¦But galaxies outside the observable universe arenāt necessarily moving at a velocity relative to us.
Iām saying that they may not be to illustrate the fact that even if they arenāt then the distance between us is expanding faster than light can travel.
Really, your propensity for arguing for the sake of arguing is becoming tedious.