20,000 Muslims Attack a Church in Cairo

  • Thread starter Thread starter MugenOne
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
He is eloquent. Unfortunatly his argument is no more sound than yours
Neploho, just exactly what is your problem? This is a Catholic forum. Are you here to cause trouble? Or to learn about your faith as you once had? You are an ex-Catholic and anything we say here, you should already know. Why are you here?
 
Neploho, just exactly what is your problem? This is a Catholic forum. Are you here to cause trouble? Or to learn about your faith as you once had? You are an ex-Catholic and anything we say here, you should already know. Why are you here?
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Neploho, just exactly what is your problem?
I do not have any problem.
This is a Catholic forum. Are you here to cause trouble?
No, and I don’t think I have. simply pointing out logically flawed arguments and factual errors is not malicious.
Or to learn about your faith as you once had? You are an ex-Catholic and anything we say here, you should already know. Why are you here?
Honestly I’m on Thanksgiving break and joined it to pass the time. Tomorrow I’ll have to get back to studies and you all will probably never see me again.
 
You would be correct. I have also never lived in a majority Catholic country, but if anti-Catholic nativism reemerged I’d oppose that as well.
It is not a question of anti-muslim nativism, or the injustice you seem to perceive against religious minorities. It is a defense against the islamic law that has created the Muslim East, and, if left unchecked, will contribute to further expansion in the West.
The suffering of minority population in some Muslim majority authoritarian states is irrelevant unless the immigrants in question have participated in human rights abuses.
I would have to instantly disagree with this assertion.
  1. The Christian faith (and its people) have the greater claim to antiquity, in comparison to the muslims. Therefore, it is factually incorrect to view them as immigrants (especially the copts of Egypt, who lay claim to the ancient see of Alexandria)
  2. There are many, many ways in which a religious minority can be persecuted which would not constitute an abuse of so-called ‘human rights’. Moreover, shifting secular morality is a poor indication of the rights that we, as children of God, have a right to.
not just outdated stearotypes. Ignorance, methodological incoherance, and fallacisious arguments also contributed.
I think ignorant is a word best used in relation to scientific fact, and doesn’t really have a place in this discussion. I will not, for example, claim that you are ignorant, because you are not aware of the acute levels of persecution that Christians suffer in a Muslim country, that cannot be seen merely through observation.

Secondly, it would appear to me that your contention lies mainly in the fact that you believe my fellow posters and I have no understanding of the Islamic faith, or at least are making judgements based on fear, or tabloid headlines.

Your own interpretation of the situation seems to be based in some sort of post-modern utopia, and I cannot, given the political climate, understand why you would cling to such a flimsy model of human existence 🤷

Thanks for the discussion! 🙂
God Bless,
 
I do not have any problem.

No, and I don’t think I have. simply pointing out logically flawed arguments and factual errors is not malicious.

Honestly I’m on Thanksgiving break and joined it to pass the time. Tomorrow I’ll have to get back to studies and you all will probably never see me again.
Oh, please stay…we are use to the abuse…:rolleyes:
 
It is not a question of anti-muslim nativism, or the injustice you seem to perceive against religious minorities. It is a defense against the islamic law that has created the Muslim East, and, if left unchecked, will contribute to further expansion in the West.
It may be such a defense, but it is not a rational one. We live in an 85% Christian country yet we do not live under Christian religious law. Simply because an immigrant is coming is a Muslim does not mean they are intent on establishing Sharia’ law.
I would have to instantly disagree with this assertion.
  1. The Christian faith (and its people) have the greater claim to antiquity, in comparison to the Muslim. Therefore, it is factually incorrect to view them as immigrants (especially the copts of Egypt, who lay claim to the ancient see of Alexandria)
I was referring to Muslim immigrants. Anyone, Muslim Christian etc, complicate in human rights abuses should not be permitted into the country baring some extraordinary circumstance. If the Muslims do not actively persecute Christians but simply live under an authoritarian government who does (either actively or passively) their governments actions should not reflect on them.
  1. There are many, many ways in which a religious minority can be persecuted which would not constitute an abuse of so-called ‘human rights’.
like what?
Moreover, shifting secular morality is a poor indication of the rights that we, as children of God, have a right to.
Well Jacques Maritain was a major force in shaping the UN’s declaration of human rights so I doubt it is to far off. Do you have anything particular in mind?
I think ignorant is a word best used in relation to scientific fact, and doesn’t really have a place in this discussion.
I suppose I disagree. When someone seems to believe that Muslim immigrants are some monolithic population despite the amply empirical evidence to the contrary I would consider that ignorant.
I will not, for example, claim that you are ignorant, because you are not aware of the acute levels of persecution that Christians suffer in a Muslim country, that cannot be seen merely through observation.
Do you live in a Muslim country?

You are right, I do not know the full extent of persecution that Christians suffer under some Islamic states. You do not seem to realize that it is not only Christians who suffer. Other denominations of Muslims suffer as well. As do Jews and liberal Muslims. Of course other populations of religious minorities get along with the larger Muslim population just fine.
Secondly, it would appear to me that your contention lies mainly in the fact that you believe my fellow posters and I have no understanding of the Islamic faith, or at least are making judgements based on fear, or tabloid headlines.
I don’t think it stems from ignorance of Islam as a religion. I have know idea what you all know about it and I am far from an expert. I do think that some here entertain fantastic vies of reality perhaps influenced by a more reactionary form of the Catholic Faith rather than a more realistic but much more messy and ambagious view of events.
Your own interpretation of the situation seems to be based in some sort of post-modern utopia, and I cannot, given the political climate, understand why you would cling to such a flimsy model of human existence 🤷
I don’t think I am delusional. I do not think that a major Holy War is inament in the US or that we ought to bar all Muslim immigrants from entering the US or Europe. My refusal to indulge in apocalyptic fantasies or bigotry give me a more, not less, clear view of the world.
Thanks for the discussion! 🙂
God Bless,
Thanks you 🙂
 
Actually, I would like in a short term, why you in fact left the Catholic church. Please be charitable in your answer.
That’s a very long story and I really don’t have time to get into it. It would never be anything but charitable. I am not one of those lapsed Catholics whois bitter with the Church or harbors any hostility to it. I simply became to tired of trying to find ways to believe it was true despite evidence to the contrary. I have not renounced it for good, I still study religion and try to determine if any is defensible in the modern world.

pax christi:)
 
It is correct to assume that one has to live in an Islamic country or under sharia law to understand what it means. I live in a mixed country and i feel the difference while moving into Christian-majority cities and Islami-majority ones even in the same country and no i don’t want to live in an Islamic populated city nor do i want the sharia law in my country…they tried but failed…i don’t want to live in a majority Muslims city not because they’re bad people but because we have a different culture and i don’t want to live under sharia law for many reasons.

As to Muslims establishing sharia law when they become a majority, this is actually a goal because their religion asks them to live under the divine sharia of Muhammad because other regimes are kufr… if one looks at the now Islamic countries which were not Islamic in the past, one can see that Muslims put their rules and others have to abide or else.

Just because one speaks of facts doesn’t make one a bigot and living in the States is not like living in the Middle East. Even in my country which isn’t Islamic and where there is a relative good number of Christians and where Muslims study in our schools and go to our hospitals, Muslims still attack our churches and our neighborhoods and our shrines, and still are willing to advance their war ideologies even if not shared by others.
 
I do not have any problem.

No, and I don’t think I have. simply pointing out logically flawed arguments and factual errors is not malicious.

Honestly I’m on Thanksgiving break and joined it to pass the time. Tomorrow I’ll have to get back to studies and you all will probably never see me again.
neploho, your visit here has been good and useful if any one wanted to make use of it. You have a loving attitude and you seem to be a good follower of Jesus. May Allah bless you.
 
Wow. That is horrible. I hope that no one was killed. I just wonder if my Coptic friend from Egypt was involved.
 
I do not have any problem.

No, and I don’t think I have. simply pointing out logically flawed arguments and factual errors is not malicious.

In all honesty…and I say this sincerely, I believe you have failed on both acounts. Your efforts were not malicious just misinformed. You sound like a man (I assume) who believes what he has been told to believe. Reality doesn’t fit into a nice package. I recomend you spend sometime in a predomentatly Islamic nation before you draw any conclusions about how willing you are to live alongside them.

Honestly I’m on Thanksgiving break and joined it to pass the time. Tomorrow I’ll have to get back to studies and you all will probably never see me again.
 
I don’t think you know what the term means.

lapsed:

–adjective 1. expired; voided; terminated: a lapsed insurance policy.
**2. no longer committed to or following the tenets of a particular belief, obligation, position, etc.: a lapsed Catholic. **

It has nothing to do with credability. I identified myself as “secular” you said this designation was “asinine” and started asking about my personal beliefs. At which point I identified myself as a “lapsed Catholic”. That definition is perfectly correct. If you dislike it, I suggust contacting Mr. Webster
Are you questioning my comprehension of the English language? I reiterate my point; there is no such thing as a ‘Lapsed Catholic’. Mr Webster may try to define its meaning in the most politically correct manner, but that does not make its definition an infallible one. Look up the definition of an ‘anarchist’ in Webster and ask real anarchists how they define themselves. Don’t assume you’ll get all your answers from a dictionary. And where did i say you were ‘asinine’? I would suggest not putting words into another’s mouth since this shows how desperate you really are in pushing your unfounded arguements across.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top