D
dochawk
Guest
If they could count on it being like the last two or three decades, rather than the prior five centuries, it would be a huge start.
I am absolutely opposed to total centralization and latinization of the Church. Same way, I am opposed to disregarding Latin dogmatic declarations about Papacy - be it infallibility, universal jurisdiction or anything else. There is no Orthodox dogma which contradicts Papal dogmas, only rhetorics. Eastern Catholics did attend Vatican I and Vatican II, signed those documents and acknowledged how both councils defined roles of Papacy and Bishops. Same way Rome agreed to Union of Brest, Council of Florence and every other document which safeguards rights and privileges of Eastern Churches, so they are indeed Sui Iuris Churches, not just extension of Latin Church with different traditions. Both sides should keep that.What if we could somehow find a compromise formula?
Like maybe how the ECs function in communion with Rome.
So I’m bringing this post from another thread, so as not to derail it from it’s point of conversation. My question seems more in line with this thread of thought.ziapueblo said:Greek Catholics and Orthodox share the same rite. A rite is more than a liturgical patrimony. Liturgy must reflects the fullness of a Tradition.
From this article I foundziapueblo said:This is a good starting point:
https://melkite.org/faith/faith-worship/does-it-matter-that-we-are-melkites
ZP
&There is a difference! Church is not something we are obliged to do an hour a week on Sunday. In our tradition it’s a way of life - our whole life! The way we see ourselves as people of God - the family of God!
My question to you Melkites… is this really what you think of Western Spirituality?Our tradition is not one of rules and recipes or ‘how to’s’, placing all the burden on what man has to do ‘to get to heaven when he dies’, but an experiential faith built on relationship with God-Trinity, that transforms and makes us ‘new creatures’ as we open ourselves to God in prayer and receive His deifying love.
we don’t pray to save our souls - and we don’t wonder if we have merited heaven by enough , piety , study and actions that are prescriptions for Western church models of spiritual development. In our tradition we are already in the Kingdom and our edict is not to save ourselves but to grow in divinity.
I know this is not how we (RC) express these ideas, but I think the understanding is the same. At least this is very close to my understanding of eternityWe do not have to live in doubt as to the ultimate reality of what will happen to us when we die – heaven or hell? The choice is ours. We exercise our free will to choose to become like God or to close God out and become locked in a prison of our own self-centeredness, where the only face we see for all eternity is our own.
I am feeling a powerful urge to mishmash your text and agree that it would be a wonderful idea fro Rome to keep to the terms of BrestSame way Rome agreed to Union of Brest, Council of Florence and every other document which safeguards rights and privileges of Eastern Churches, so they are indeed Sui Iuris Churches, not just extension of Latin Church with different traditions. Both sides should keep that.
That’s probably the perspective of most Eastern Christians (EC or EO). Not saying that this is my personal opinion since I did grow up Roman Catholic. It’s one of those things, even within the Catholic communion little is known about one another.My question to you Melkites… is this really what you think of Western Spirituality?
Also from the Union of Ungvár (Uzhorod) for those in Austria-Hungry:…
I wish I could find the actual texts …
again, I’d suggest the East and West forum at byzcath.org.Do you have any Eastern Catholic links you can pm me? I’d love to delve into this Eastern spirituality.