30,000 denominations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mick_Taylor
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes it does 2 Peter 1:20

Understanding this first, that no prophecy of scripture is made by private interpretation.
Oh my.
2Pe 1:-21{So} we have the prophetic word {made} more sure, to which you do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star arises in your hearts.
But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is {a matter} of one’s own interpretation,
for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God.
The verses are addressing scripture. Scripture is not a person’s interpretation or an act of human will but was written by men moved by the Holy Spirit.
 
Oh my.

The verses are addressing scripture. Scripture is not a person’s interpretation or an act of human will but was written by men moved by the Holy Spirit.
not entirely sure what Bible version your using

2 Peter 1:21 (Douay-Rheims)

For prophecy came not by the will of man at any time: but the holy men of God spoke, inspired by the Holy Ghost.

Haydock Bible Commentary.

Ver. 21. For prophecy came not by the will of man at any time. This is to shew that they are not to be expounded by any one’s private judgment, because every part of the holy Scriptures is delivered to us by the divine spirit of God, wherewith the men were inspired who wrote them; therefore they are not to be interpreted but by the spirit of God, which he left, and promised to his Church to guide her in all truth to the end of the world. Our adversaries may perhaps tell us, that we also interpret prophecies and Scriptures; we do so; but we do it always with a submission to the judgment of the Church, they without it. (Witham)

Your Bible seems to add to scripture
 
of what Bible??
NASB

Perhaps a more modern translation with assist as well NIV…perhaps not

2Pe 1:19-21 And we have the word of the prophets made more certain, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.
Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation.
For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
 
NRSV

Second Peter 1:19-21
19 So we have the prophetic message more fully confirmed. You will do well to be attentive to this as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. 20First of all you must understand this, that no prophecy of scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation, 21because no prophecy ever came by human will, but men and women moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God.*
 
NASB

Perhaps a more modern translation with assist as well NIV…perhaps not

2Pe 1:19-21 And we have the word of the prophets made more certain, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.
Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation.
For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
never mind I thought you were using only verse 21. My mistake. The NIV is very inaccurate. I do think the NASB is one of the more accurate non-Catholic Bibles out there but def not the most accurate
 
Ok you piqued my curiousity, what is the most accurate translation and why? Briefly 😃
 
Ok you piqued my curiousity, what is the most accurate translation and why? Briefly 😃
Catholic or Protestant.

Catholic - Latin Vulgate and its English counterpiece Douay-Rheims
Protestant - either the Geneva Bible or the KJV, both extremely anti-Catholic in notes
 
But there are several groups that have scripture and Sacred Tradition. Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox. They are not the Catholic Church but in every sense they would say it is Catholicism and not them that are correct. In other words, if the presence of even TWO groups invalidate Sola Scriptura, so does the presence of two groups for these as well. In other words, subjective human response does not determine or invalidate TRUTH. The issue is not whether you have a compelling case for being the one true Church but faulty reasoning can also be used against us.
Although Catholic Church recognizes Orthodox as having full communion with Catholic Church, this does not simply mean Orthodox Church is Catholic Church. The communion is only due to the Apostolic Succession. Orthodox splits of with Catholics when they decided not to recognize the Authority of the Church - the Pope, who is the head of the Bishops, (Pope isn’t God and isn’t above Jesus and isn’t spiritually infallible as most protestants misunderstood, but he is rather the head guided by Holy Spirit. Pope can sin too) - resulting in different hierarchies.
 
Although Catholic Church recognizes Orthodox as having full communion with Catholic Church, this does not simply mean Orthodox Church is Catholic Church. The communion is only due to the Apostolic Succession. Orthodox splits of with Catholics when they decided not to recognize the Authority of the Church - the Pope, who is the head of the Bishops, (Pope isn’t God and isn’t above Jesus and isn’t spiritually infallible as most protestants misunderstood, but he is rather the head guided by Holy Spirit. Pope can sin too) - resulting in different hierarchies.
Well…that is one version of your view 😃
Remember when we had the Orthodox on a forum and we had these debates everyday…I do 😉
 
I have NO personal interpreation of Scripture. I am not qualified to interpret scripture for you or anyone else. The primacy of Peter is proven by
  1. Scripture
  2. Sacred Tradition
  3. The unchanging teachings of the magestrium.
Hi estesbob,

How did you (I mean you personally) come to know that the primacy of Peter is proven by
  1. Scripture
  2. Sacred Tradition
  3. The unchanging teachings of the magestrium
 
And to whom and where did God reveal this Canon? And why did God reveal a different OT canon to them than he did the Jews?
Hi estesbob,

Every book of the bible self-testifies or self-reveals that it is God-breathed…but only to those God chooses to reveal this to. The church can’t make the canon, it can only declare which books it has recognized as Scripture.
 
Hi estesbob,

How did you (I mean you personally) come to know that the primacy of Peter is proven by
  1. Scripture
  2. Sacred Tradition
  3. The unchanging teachings of the magestrium
I trust those who have been there from the very beginning.
 
Hi estesbob,

**Every book of the bible self-testifies that it is God-breathed…but only to those God chooses. **The church can’t make the canon, it can only declare which books it has recognized as Scripture.
So you beleive in predestination?
 
I trust those who have been there from the very beginning.
Hi estesbob,

Let me guess. You have come to know (somehow) that “those who have been there from the very beginning” were the Catholic Church?
 
So you beleive in predestination?
Yes, and I believe that from God’s point of view there is no such thing as “chance”. God didn’t leave the canon of Scripture to “chance”. Instead, God gave the early church the guidance of the Holy Spirit to discern which books are inspired.
 
Yes, and I believe that from God’s point of view there is no such thing as “chance”. God didn’t leave the canon of Scripture to “chance”. Instead, God gave the early church the guidance of the Holy Spirit to discern which books are inspired.
The only place I disagree with you is the word “early” . The Spirit did not withdraw-he has guided the catholic church for over 2,000 years.
 
Hi estesbob,

Every book of the bible self-testifies or self-reveals that it is God-breathed…but only to those God chooses to reveal this to. The church can’t make the canon, it can only declare which books it has recognized as Scripture.
Wrong, only one book claims to be inspired in the NT, Revelations…How do we know Mark wrote Mark? How do we know for sure the auther of Acts is the same author as Hebrews or Romans??..In fact many scholars believe the author of Hebrews is unkown and not Paul, hence the writing styles from Acts to Romans to Hebrews is very different .Paul tells timothy that scripture is inspired and profitable for teaching, but he is talking about the OT…even then what books of the OT is Paul referring too???.. The book of Wicca claims to be inspired so does the Koran, and much others. …On what authority do we say the Christian bible is inspired, vs all others??? Who does the Holy Spirit speak too, the individual interepreter,??? dont think so!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top