Right at the beginning of the answers from Bishop Fellay he says this (emphasis mine):
But for us it is about something else: **we hope to tell Rome what the Church has always taught **
I was thinking exactly the same thing.
This seems, at least to me, to be very presumptious on the part of the SSPX.
While I understand the desire to hold onto tradition, part of our tradition is that the Pope makes the rules.
I live in a diocese where a priest, who had leanings
way to the left of center, was removed from ministry, and his congregation broke away and formed their own church, *“in the catholic tradition” *(their words, not mine). They had “open communion”, married & women priests/deacons, performed marriages for same sex couples, etc. This
“schism” , as it is called in my community, by all accounts, has been very difficult for our Bishop and some of our priests & lay people because they believe that what this community was doing was the right thing to do.
What I do not understand is how is what the SSPX is doing any different from this situation?
The people of this community believed with all their hearts, minds & souls that what they were doing was the right thing to do, just as I am sure that the people who belong to the SSPX do. But in the end, isn’t their disobedience born of the same idea, that they are right and the Magisterium in wrong?