P
PickyPicky
Guest
If this datapoint is useless, why did you call for it in your last post?
read my post again, I suggested that relevancy increased when multiple datapoints are combined.If this datapoint is useless, why did you call for it in your last post?
The post to which you are replying says nothing about guns, and even so provides insights and proves something about US culture.PickyPicky:![]()
That is a datapoint that provides no insights, proves nothing.The murder rate in the US is something like four or five times as high as the rate in Western Europe.
In a separate thread I showed the comparison between gun ownership in US states and their homicide rates. Analysis showed there was no statistical correlation, not even a weak correlation. This was with 50 data points and what I assume is consistent methodology in measurement.
There were so many factors at play in that time period, I am not sure how you happened to pick “drug culture.” Vietnam war, sexual revolution, Watergate, Arab oil crisis, … (and Vatican II?). I think we have to dig a little deeper to explain the rise in US homicides.But taking a look at the country comparison, it would indicated the US rate skyrocketed with the drug culture of the 60’s.
national numbers aren’t a true reflection on the majority of the country. we have plenty of bad cities which increase the rate but most of the country is safe. however, this doesn’t fit the gun control agenda.The murder rate in the US is something like four or five times as high as the rate in Western Europe.
Remove Chicago, Baltimore, Washington DC, Camden NJ, St. Louis, New Orleans, Memphis, South Los Angeles alone, and the number change (improve) dramatically.national numbers aren’t a true reflection on the majority of the country. we have plenty of bad cities which increase the rate but most of the country is safe. however, this doesn’t fit the gun control agenda.
What gives indeed. If you want to insist that it is not guns per se that are the problem yet you are more likely to get shot in the US as compared to Switzerland, by a factor of 7, then I think it’s fair to say that compared to Switzerland (and the UK and Canada and Australia etc etc), your society is in the toilet.If it’s only guns that are at fault, how do you explain Switzerland? I’ve read that gun ownership is very high in Switzerland,. Something like 30% of Swiss citizens own guns. And yet they have one-seventh the rate of firearm deaths that occur here in the States. What gives?
Hey, that’s a great idea. Keep taking out the places where people get shot and you’ll end up with a zero death rate. As if every other country couldn’t do that. How about I take the Western Suburbs of Sydney out of the equation. And Tasmania. And rural Queensland. And the Northern Territories.Remove Chicago, Baltimore, Washington DC, Camden NJ, St. Louis, New Orleans, Memphis, South Los Angeles alone, and the number change (improve) dramatically.
Total homicide or total suicide, I have no objection to focusing on the former.No, you suggested that the relevant figure would be total deaths due to crime or suicide. My post refers to total deaths due to crime. Useful start?
this is a ludicrous argument! of course if you don’t have guns you don’t have gun deaths. it is all in the wordingto deny that one of the highest gun ownership rates on the planet is not the cause of one of the highest rates of gun deaths
Firstly, it’s not my argument. It’s you and others are denying that the rate of gun ownership has anything to do with the rate of gun deaths. So read my post again. Let’s forget that you have one of the highest gun ownership rates.Bradskii:![]()
this is a ludicrous argument! of course if you don’t have guns you don’t have gun deaths. it is all in the wordingto deny that one of the highest gun ownership rates on the planet is not the cause of one of the highest rates of gun deaths
but as australia shows the mass killer will just choose another tool
australia had 14 mass killings in the 20 years before the ban and 14 mass killings in the 20 years after the ban.
guns continue to increase in australia. illegal guns increased to a point where you had another amnesty this fall. if it is related to the number of guns in circulation why haven’t you had any mass killings with guns since a quarter million illegal additional guns are now in circulation?
it is easy when the number is made on such a diverse country as the usa but let us break it down.It’s you and others are denying that the rate of gun ownership has anything to do with the rate of gun deaths.
Despite a near ban on the civilian ownership of handguns the review found crimes committed with handguns increased by 25 percent and accounted for the majority of gun crimes. The agency said the increases in 2016 were part of a multiyear trend.(http://freebeacon.com)
how can this be when guns aren’t allowed? they must be coming from indiana.Offences involving firearms increased by 27% (to 6,696) in year ending June 2017 compared with the previous year (5,269 offences). This was driven largely by a 25% increase in offences involving handguns (up to 2,791 from 2,224) (Office for National Statistics)
So you live in an extremely violent society. Some parts are relatively safe where others aren’t. Which is exactly the same in other countries. So tell me why the US has such an atrocious gun death rate.Bradskii:![]()
it is easy when the number is made on such a diverse country as the usa but let us break it down.It’s you and others are denying that the rate of gun ownership has anything to do with the rate of gun deaths.
explain to me these low ownership states:
Delaware 5% ownership 2015 murder rate of 6.6 per 100k
new joisy 11% ownership 2015 murder rate of 4.1 per 100k
crayzifornia 20% ownership 2015 murder rate of 4.8 per 100k
versus
idaho 57% ownership 2015 murder rate of 1.9 per 100k
wyoming 54% ownership 2015 murder rate of 2.7 per 100k
north dakota 48% ownership 2015 murder rate of 2.8 per 100k
hawaii 45% ownership 2015 murder rate of 2.0 per 100k
now lets see how handgun banned england fixed the problem.
Despite a near ban on the civilian ownership of handguns the review found crimes committed with handguns increased by 25 percent and accounted for the majority of gun crimes. The agency said the increases in 2016 were part of a multiyear trend.(http://freebeacon.com)how can this be when guns aren’t allowed? they must be coming from indiana.Offences involving firearms increased by 27% (to 6,696) in year ending June 2017 compared with the previous year (5,269 offences). This was driven largely by a 25% increase in offences involving handguns (up to 2,791 from 2,224) (Office for National Statistics)
it is the me mentalitywhy the deaths happen. You say that guns aren’t the problem but if that is the case, you have zero idea what the actual problem is.