No, that is not what I am saying. What I say is that because God is Himself alive He cannot possibly be the explanation for the origin of life in the universe. Note that I have omitted the word “corporeal” from your sentence. It was you who added that word, not me. I was very careful to omit it when starting this sub-thread of the discussion.
No, I do not. I define the universe as “all that exists”, and as far as I can tell that universe is eternal, with no beginning.
*Don’t you think all the evidence is in now on the Universe having a beginning?
This is but one eternity. Why do you think the like of Hawkins et al is scrambling for an alternative such as multiverses? sheer desperation!
*
A cause cannot exist without its effect. In the absence of the effect, there can be no cause. We cannot have a “creator the universe” unless there is a universe that has been created. A child must have parents, and similarly a parent must have children, otherwise it is false to call them a parent. A creator who has not created anything is obviously not a creator.
Cause and effect are mutually conditioning and are mutually contingent. The effect is contingent on the cause, and the cause is contingent on the effect.
rossum