84-year-old activist nun imprisoned in Brooklyn jail hellhole for breaking into nuclear facility, exposing security flaws

  • Thread starter Thread starter _thaddeus
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I can admire some one who wanted to serve in prison for her faith. Personally, my faith is not in nuclear proliferation nor is trespassing a sacramental. But to each their own.

Anyone else note how incredible editorialized that hatchet piece was? It is truly an editorial, not a news article, unless one takes it as a form of yellow journalism. This Linda Stasi must think all her readers are idiots.
I am not she 🙂 but I don’t think “all her readers are idiots”.

It seems that you didn’t like the article. I thought it was informative. Were you offended by the style or the content? Was any of it untrue?

There are 100,000 tons of this stuff (bomb-grade, explosive, highly enriched uranium) being stored there. It is very expensive to produce and safeguard.
King Midas and his touch greeka.com/greece-myths/king-midas.htm

The new Argus “all-seeing” system was working perfectly. You(we) were all perfectly safe for a couple of months until Sister Megan and her crew showed up.
The Emperor’s New Clothes andersen.sdu.dk/vaerk/hersholt/TheEmperorsNewClothes_e.html

Because of their good deed they were suitably rewarded.
Old Tales and New of Leadership, Organizational Culture, and Ethics
scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/business/truth-to-power.html
"
The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear.–Herbert Agar, A Time for Greatness (1942)

Speaking truth to power is perhaps the oldest and, certainly, one of the most difficult of ethical challenges because to do so entails personal danger. From the day humans descended from our ape-like ancestors until only very recently, tribal leaders, clan elders, kings, and just plain bosses were men who ruled by force. To question their decisions was to risk death.
"
I disagree with the phrase “until only very recently”.
 
It might be correct that dropping one grapefruit size piece of highly enriched uranium onto another would cause a Hiroshima-type explosion, but I would sure want to see a real expert say that before I would be inclined to believe it.

The basic construction of an atomic bomb, as I understand it, requires one of two types of triggering devices.
  1. A great deal of TNT arranged around the uranium or plutonium core, all of which TNT has to go off at the same time and perfectly symmetrically in order to massively compress the core so it’s dense enough to cause an instantaneous runaway chain reaction, or
  2. A “nuclear bullet” of highly enriched uranium or plutonium that is fired with high explosives at an enriched core.
If you don’t do one or the other, the atoms are too far apart and with too much space in them for there to be a sudden chain reaction. Even with triggers, only about 1.5% of the uranium or plutonium actually fissions. The rest is scattered by the explosion and again becomes too far apart to cause an explosive chain reaction.

Perhaps some physicist on here could address all of that.

Getting arrested is considered a great honor by the unilateral disarmament folks. They congratulate each other and confer honors on each other for being “prophetic” and “heroes” and all that kind of thing. It’s practically a ritual for them.
 
It might be correct that dropping one grapefruit size piece of highly enriched uranium onto another would cause a Hiroshima-type explosion, but I would sure want to see a real expert say that before I would be inclined to believe it.

The basic construction of an atomic bomb, as I understand it, requires one of two types of triggering devices.
  1. A great deal of TNT arranged around the uranium or plutonium core, all of which TNT has to go off at the same time and perfectly symmetrically in order to massively compress the core so it’s dense enough to cause an instantaneous runaway chain reaction, or
  2. A “nuclear bullet” of highly enriched uranium or plutonium that is fired with high explosives at an enriched core.
If you don’t do one or the other, the atoms are too far apart and with too much space in them for there to be a sudden chain reaction. Even with triggers, only about 1.5% of the uranium or plutonium actually fissions. The rest is scattered by the explosion and again becomes too far apart to cause an explosive chain reaction.

Perhaps some physicist on here could address all of that.

Getting arrested is considered a great honor by the unilateral disarmament folks. They congratulate each other and confer honors on each other for being “prophetic” and “heroes” and all that kind of thing. It’s practically a ritual for them.
^^^This. To read this in more detail, check out Tom Clancy’s novel The Sum of All Fears. In researching for this novel, Clancy was alarmed to see how much information on building a nuclear device was available openly on the internet. He deliberately left some of that information out.

Anyway, simply dropping one chunk of enriched uranium onto another will not trigger an event. The uranium has to be compressed by the force of an explosive trigger.
 
One can choose either to be applauded as prophetic, or to act in such a way as to really be prophetic. There are people now who have been incarcerated, or lost their job, or lost out on a potential career in politics, media, or education, because of their opposition to abortion or same-sex marriage. Their homes and offices are vandalized, they get assaulted, and the media usually ignores the, occasionally ridicules them. They would be the prophetic people. They attack the the establishment villains who are applauded as heroes.

There are other people who also act on their convictions, but have massive support from the establishment - that is, the media. They attack institutions that are very unpopular. They support causes that are already popular and well known. Friendly reporters visit them in prison. They can hold press conferences anytime they want, and the powerful attend. I’m not saying they are “bad”. But please don’t put them in the same category as the first paragraph.
 
I am not she 🙂 but I don’t think “all her readers are idiots”.

It seems that you didn’t like the article. I thought it was informative. Were you offended by the style or the content? Was any of it untrue?.
Propaganda is laced with loaded keywords. For example, even in the title, the nun is labeled as “activist” and the prison is as “hellhole.” A journalist of the non-yellow variety would say that an 84 year old nun was sent to a federal prison for trespassing while protesting. It was not truth versus lack of truth that bothered me. Propaganda is the presentation of truth in a manner that conveys more than truth. But no, there is no prison devised by Man the equivalent of Hell. That part is untrue.
 
This sounds martyr-like. Why does she want no leniency? I think it likely the longer she is in jail, the more articles like the one in the OP will be written. And that’s what she wants.
What system of “justice” would permit a convict to hire or otherwise arrange for a substitute to do their punishment for them? Plus, nothing in her history would seem to indicate that she would want someone to take her place.
Well, I don’t know about hiring. But I can think of one particular person that arranged Himself as a substitute for punishment…
 
Propaganda is laced with loaded keywords. For example, even in the title, the nun is labeled as “activist” and the prison is as “hellhole.” A journalist of the non-yellow variety would say that an 84 year old nun was sent to a federal prison for trespassing while protesting. It was not truth versus lack of truth that bothered me. Propaganda is the presentation of truth in a manner that conveys more than truth. But no, there is no prison devised by Man the equivalent of Hell. That part is untrue.
I generally agree with your above, however the quite properly vicious language in the piece was correct and appropriate. Her treatment is disgusting.

“An English magazine in 1898 noted, “All American journalism is not ‘yellow’, though all strictly ‘up-to-date’ yellow journalism is American!”[4]”
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism [this was when the uppity “Americans” were trying to steal some European colonies]

Just a few out of context quotes. The full monty en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_monty_%28phrase%29 is at nydailynews.com/new-york/brooklyn/exclusive-nun-84-brooklyn-jail-hellhole-activism-article-1.2083481

“Her criminal odyssey began in 2012.”

[Not exactly correct. She also wasn’t a big fan of the School of the Americas [renamed the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC)] and its graduates. School of the Americas Watch . en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_of_the_Americas_Watch ]
"
The nun, … is now living in deplorable prison conditions, wearing a beige uniform and stuffed in with 111 other women into a single room at a federal prison right here in New York City.

she was there to bring to the attention of all Americans the dangers of unimpeded nuclear proliferation.

They crawled through the openings they had cut, then stood up and walked to the building — easily avoiding any electronic motion sensors and video cameras — without encountering a single guard.

Once they reached the highly enriched uranium-materials facility, “I wrapped some pillars in crime tape,” she told Daily News. “We splashed a vial of human blood on the wall.”

They spray-painted quotes from the Bible such as, “Swords into plowshares,” and banged on the building with hammers. Then they waited to be arrested. They waited some more.

Finally, “We saw a car with a guard slowly driving up. He stopped, and radioed to the police that protesters had gotten in.”

The women eat in the same unit in which they defecate, sleep, shower and wash.

And this is the United States of America, where “Real Housewife” and federal prisoner Teresa Giudice lives in luxury at the federal prison in Danbury, Conn., compared to the inhumane conditions Sister Megan and her cellmates are enduring in New York City.
"
FCI Danbury : A low security federal correctional institution with an adjacent minimum security satellite camp.
bop.gov/locations/institutions/dan/
List and prices of items sold at the commissary in FCI Danbury bop.gov/locations/institutions/dan/DAN_CommList.pdf ]
"
Her crime? Breaking into a federal nuclear facility at age 82.

I got to meet the sister last week, months after applying for clearance, being denied and then finally getting approval. On a freezing cold night, I walked into the Metropolitan Detention Center and stored everything in a locker but a few one dollar bills allowed for the vending machines.

At 5 p.m., the official start of visiting hours, we were brought into a large, chilly room with armless chairs lined up in rows overseen by one guard. On one side was a sad “playroom” for the prisoners’ children, perhaps 8-by-10 feet, with nothing but a few dirty stuffed animals.

Visiting was supposed to be from 5 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., but it wasn’t until 5:45 p.m. that prisoners were brought in.

She wore a prison-issued sweatsuit under her beige uniform to combat the cold in the visitor’s room.

“I don’t think I’m supposed to wear the sweatsuit, so they may not allow me to,” she said without a hint of self-pity.

Instead a guard came by to admonish her for moving her chair a few inches out of line in order to lean forward to look at me as we spoke. She immediately pushed it back.

She knew she’d go to prison for breaking into the nuclear facility as a protest, she told me, but believes it’s up to people without children who have nothing to lose to take the risks others can’t afford.

The Y-12 Nuclear Facility, which they breached in less than seven minutes, and which can theoretically be breached by real terrorists,

The facility didn’t bother to find or even fix the cuts in the fences for five months — until they were shown them by members of Plowshares.

After serving at another federal lockup, Sister Megan was transferred last year to the Brooklyn center, to the single floor opened to house the 111 female prisoners.

Sister Megan Rice is scheduled for release in November. She will be 85.
"
 
I generally agree with your above, however the quite properly vicious language in the piece was correct and appropriate. Her treatment is disgusting.

"
Considering the hell-holes of some prisons around the world, she is doing just fine. Disgusting? I would submit that it is not the Hilton Royal; she is in a prison. And the fact that the women are in a large room indicates that they are low risk prisoners. Would you rather she was in an 8 by 12 cell? Her conditions are not what I would call disgusting. One of the purposes of prison is to convince one to not take up more crime upon being released.

As I have said before, I think she should have been given a short probation, and whoever was responsible for the protection of that facility, from the contractors who designed the security controls, to the guards, monitors, and up to head of security and head of the whole operation, and anyone over them if complaints about security weakness had been made, should have had their proverbial heads rolling down the pike.

An old phrase of criminal defense lawyers: “If you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime.”

She can do the time, although I still feel that for what she revealed, and what appears to be far more minor damage than the Feds made it out to be should have resulted in probation - she did break laws - but should also include recognition that she showed a fantastic disregard for the safety of the site on the part of those charged with the integrity of the site.
 
I generally agree with your above, however the quite properly vicious language in the piece was correct and appropriate. Her treatment is disgusting…
"
Having to wear beige, chairs without arms? Deplorable! What exactly does a critique of this prison have to do with the story? Nothing. It is a hatchet piece. Now if one likes yellow journalism when it expresses one’s own emotions, then I am sure this article finds a ready audience. Just look at how popular shock radio is.
 
Having to wear beige, chairs without arms? Deplorable! What exactly does a critique of this prison have to do with the story? Nothing. It is a hatchet piece. Now if one likes yellow journalism when it expresses one’s own emotions, then I am sure this article finds a ready audience. Just look at how popular shock radio is.
What is the story?

Is it “84-year-old activist nun”?
Is it “imprisoned in Brooklyn jail hellhole”?
Is it “breaking into nuclear facility”?
is it “exposing security flaws”?
"
The Y-12 Nuclear Facility, which they breached in less than seven minutes, and which can theoretically be breached by real terrorists,

The facility didn’t bother to find or even fix the cuts in the fences for five months — until they were shown them by members of Plowshares.

After serving at another federal lockup, Sister Megan was transferred last year to the Brooklyn center, to the single floor opened to house the 111 female prisoners.
"
It seems that Sister Megan is getting enhanced special treatment for her transgressions. She must be the wrong kind of people.

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

FPC Alderson
Number of prisoners: 1,215
Alderson, W.Va.

A stand-alone prison camp in West Virginia for females, Alderson was home to Martha Stewart when she served five months for lying to investigators about a stock sale. Stewart has described her stint behind bars as a time of reflection and learning, according to The New York Times.
Besides taking the time to reflect on one’s transgressions, inmates have plenty of other ways to pass the time. They may swim in the pool, or participate in talent shows and game shows. They can also play volleyball, softball, basketball, tennis, racquetball, basketball, or go roller skating.

The Best Places to Go to Prison
cnbc.com/id/46042723
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top